Mamta Devi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Mamta Devi vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 02, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047480

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1047480
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Apr 02, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mamta Devi

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

.....no.2. initially, the trial magistrate granted bail to the applicant, thereafter, respondent no.2 filed a revision and after remand of the case and statement of complainant, the trial court issued warrant of arrest against applicant. the applicant is ready to co.operate in further proceedings. there is no possibility of her absconding from trial. the applicant is a reputed citizen of the locality, in the event of arrest her reputation will be tarnished, therefore, she be released on ad-interim anticipatory bail. learned counsel for state has opposed the application. on due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and overall facts and circumstances of the case, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to grant ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicant, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, i.a.no.7092/2013 is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.25,000/- (rs.twenty five thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of arresting officer. the applicant is directed to join the investigation and fully co-operate with the investigating agency. she shall further abide by the other conditions enumerated in sub-section (2) of section 438 of cr.p.c.this order shall remain in force till disposal of the main application under section 438 of cr.p.c.list for final hearing in the week commencing 22.4.2013. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge pb

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.3845/2013 2.4.2013 Shri Siddharth Datt, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State.

Admit.

Call for the case diary.

Issue notice of this admission to respondent No.2.

Steps be taken within 7 days by RAD and Ordinary modes.

Notice be made returnable within two weeks.

Heard on I.A.No.7092/2013, an application for grant of ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicant.

The applicant apprehends her arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.136/2009 (New No.52/2013) pending in the Court of JMFC, Sirmour, District Rewa for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 466, 468 and 471 of the IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is a lady, she has been falsely implicated in this case.

The case arose out of a private complaint filed by respondent No.2.

Initially, the trial Magistrate granted bail to the applicant, thereafter, respondent No.2 filed a revision and after remand of the case and statement of complainant, the trial Court issued warrant of arrest against applicant.

The applicant is ready to Co.operate in further proceedings.

There is no possibility of her absconding from trial.

The applicant is a reputed citizen of the locality, in the event of arrest her reputation will be tarnished, therefore, she be released on ad-interim anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel for State has opposed the application.

On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to grant ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicant, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I.A.No.7092/2013 is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs.Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of arresting officer.

The applicant is directed to join the investigation and fully co-operate with the investigating agency.

She shall further abide by the other conditions enumerated in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.This order shall remain in force till disposal of the main application under section 438 of Cr.P.C.List for final hearing in the week commencing 22.4.2013.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Mamta Devi vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education