Madhya Pradesh Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Nirmala Bai Dhurve Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
M.Cr.C.No.2048/2013 20.3.2013 Shri Manish Gavane , counsel for the applicant. Shri R.K.Kesharwani, PL, for the State. Heard. This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.for grant of bail. The applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No.39/2013 registered at Police Station Pandurna, District Chhindwara for offence punishable under Section 34 (2) of M.P.Excise Act. As per prosecution, it is alleged that 58 bulk liters illicit liquor is said to have been seized from the possession of the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in custody since 17.1.2012. She has been falsely implicated in this case. She is a lady and if she remained in jail, her life will be spoiled and trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, he prays for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail. On due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case alongwith gravity of offence and period of ...
Mahendra Kumar Jadiya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
Writ Petition No.18898/2006 20.3.2013 Shri Abhishek Arjaria, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Rajas Pohankar, Advocate, for respondent no.2. By this petition, filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of order dated 31.7.2005 passed by the Judicial Magistrate FiRs.Class, Ajaygarh, District Panna, in Criminal Case No.71/2004 whereby he has acquitted respondent no.2 in a Lok Adalat on the basis of compromise. On a complaint made by the petitioner in the Court of Judicial Magistrate FiRs.Class, an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was registered against respondent no.2. However, in the Lok Adalat respondent no.2 entered into a compromise with the petitioner on a promise that he will pay the amount due against him in installments. The agreement has been filed as Annexure P-1 and the terms of payment of amount by respondent no.2 are enumerated therein. The petitioner bonafidely believed respondent no.2 and agree...
Deepanker Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
M.Cr.C.No.1824/2013 20.3.2013 Shri Pushpendra Dubey, counsel for the applicant(s).Shri Akhilendra Kumar Singh, GA, for the respondent/State. Heard. The applicant is in custody since 17.3.2012 in connection with Crime No.50/2010 registered at P.S.Chopana, District Betul for the offence punishable under Sections 304-B/34 of IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The statement of mother of deceased Deepika has already been recorded. She exaggerated the fact in her statement. Same did not find place in the statement recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C.Trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicant. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. On due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit cas...
Rakesh Singh Gaharwar Vs. Dinesh Kumar Dwivedi
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
W.P.NO.3077/13 20-03-2013 Shri M.P.Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner. Challenging the order passed by the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Rewa under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, petitioner has filed his writ petition. It is seen that ex-parte proceedings were held and award has been passed by the Forum. In execution proceedings certain objections raised by the petitioner having been rejected, this writ petition is filed. The order passed by the Forum is subject to appeal before the State Commission and the National Commission and therefore, a petition directly before this court without taking recouRs.to the remedy of statutory appeal is not permissible. Accordingly granting liberty to the petitioner to take recouRs.to the said remedy available the writ petition is dismissed. Certified copy as per rules. (S.A.Bobde) (Rajendra Menon) Chief Justice Judge hsp...
G.P.Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
-1- W.P.No.16337/2012 20/2/2013 Shri A.K.Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri A.K.Sharma, learned Govt.Advocate for respondent State. Shri J.K.Pillai, learned counsel for respondents no.3,4 and 5. Petitioner, a retired Supervisor vide this petition seeks direction to respondents no.3,4 and 5 to settle the outstanding dues of 2006-2007 till date to the tune of Rs.1,61,097/- on account of EPF. On being noticed respondents no.3 to 5 have filed their return wherein it is stated that petitioner was member of EPF scheme and an amount of Rs.1,48,650/- accumulated in his P.F.A/C.not MP/ 5417/909 maintained with respondent no.4, the Assistant Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Bhopal. After crediting the same on 2.5.2002 transferred the said amount on 22.5.2002 to P.F.A/C not M.P./4044/4946 maintained by respondent no.5,the Assistant Regional Provdent Fund Commissioner , Ujjain. -2- It is further contended that respondent no.5 has disbursed an amount of RS.1,76,930/- to the petitio...
Phool Singh @ Phool Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.GUPTA, J.Criminal Revision No.160/2013 Phool Singh @ Phool and another VERSUS The State of Madhya Pradesh --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri Ashish Tiwari, counsel for the applicants. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER (Passed on the 20th day of March, 2013) The applicants were convicted for the offence punishable under section 327 of IPC vide judgment dated 3.5.2011 passed by the learned JMFC, Tikamgarh (Shri Vipin Singh Bhadauriya) in criminal case No.842/2010 and each sentenced for 1 year's rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.250/-. In criminal appeal No.260/2011, the learned Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh vide judgment dated 22.1.2013 maintained the conviction but, their sentence was reduced to the period of 6 months with fine of Rs....
Mahendra Rai Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
M.Cr.C.No.3013/2013 21.3.2013 Shri Vishal Dhagat, counsel for the applicant. Shri R.K.Kesharwani, PL , for the State. Heard. This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.for grant of bail. The applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No.25/13 registered at Police Station Hindoria, District Damoh for offence punishable under Section 34 (2) of M.P.Excise Act. As per prosecution, it is alleged that 142 bulk liters illicit liquor is said to have been seized from the possession of the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in custody since 6.2.2013. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, he prays for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail. On due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case alongwith gravity of offence and period of custody, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the v...
Tapan Kumar Bhowmick Vs. Dr. Ashok Kumar Mukherjee and anr
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
(1) Civil Revision No.1610/2002 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice A.K. Shrivastava Civil Revision No.1610 /2002 Applicant : Shri Tapan Kumar Bhomick, R/o. 1051, Vivekanand Ward, Yadav Colony, Jabalpur (M.P.) Vs. Respondents :1. Dr. Ashok Kumar Mukherjee S/o. Late Dr. Sharat Kumar Mukherjee, 2. Smt. Sushila mukherjee, W/o. Sharat Mukherjee, Both resident of 1818, Wright Town, Jabalpur (M.P.) _________________________________________________________ Smt. Jai Shree Mukharjee, Advocate for applicant. Shri M. Safiqullah, Advocate for respondents. _________________________________________________________ ORDER ( 20/03/2013) This revision application has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 21.08.2002 passed by learned XII Additional District Judge, Jabalpur in Civil Appeal No.8-A/2001 whereby the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2000 passed by learned VI Civil Judge, Class-II Jabalpur in Civil Suit No.34-A/2000 has been re...
Devendra Kumar Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
M.Cr.C.No.1786/2013 20.3.2013 Shri O.P.Agnihotri, counsel for the applicants. Shri R.K.Kesharwani, PL, for the State. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicants prays for withdrawal of the application of applicant No.1, Devendra Kumar Patel S/o Ramdas Patel. Prayer is allowed. The application of applicant No.1, Devendara Kumar Patel is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard. This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.for grant of bail to applicant No.2, Munna alias Shyam Sunder Lodhi. The applicant no.2 is in custody since 26.8.2012 in connection with Crime No.190/2012 registered at Police Station G.R.P.(Railway Police).Katni for offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120-B/34 of IPC. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicant No.2 has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that there is no directed evidence against him in regard to commit murder of Dippu Singh. As per prosecution, nothing is seized from the possession of this ap...
Netram Singh Kurmi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
M.Cr.C. No.2234/2013 20.3.2013 Shri Sharad Verma, counsel for the applicant. Shri Akhilendra Kumar Singh, GA for the State. Heard. This is an application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail. Applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No. 67/13 registered at Police Station Gotegaon, District Narsinghpur for offence punishable under Sections 452, 294, 324, 506, 323, 326/34 of IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He has no criminal past. As per prosecution itself, it is alleged against this applicant that he assaulted the injured Lakhan by using piece of brick, in these circumstances at the most a case under Section 324 of IPC is made out against him. Therefore, no primafacie case under Section 326 of IPC is made out against the applicant. The applicant is a reputed person of the society and in ...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »