Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Deepanker Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Deepanker vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Mar 20, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046274

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepanker

Advocate Shri. Pushpendra Dubey

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.1824/2013 20.3.2013 shri pushpendra dubey, counsel for the applicant(s).shri akhilendra kumar singh, ga, for the respondent/state. heard. the applicant is in custody since 17.3.2012 in connection with crime no.50/2010 registered at p.s.chopana, district betul for the offence punishable under sections 304-b/34 of ipc. learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. the statement of mother of deceased deepika has already been recorded. she exaggerated the fact in her statement. same did not find place in the statement recorded under section 161 of cr.p.c.trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicant. learned counsel for the state opposes the prayer. on due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, i am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. the application is allowed. it is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs.30,000/- (rupees thirty thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal court/trial court concerned, for his appearance before the said court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said court during trial. c.c.as per rules. (g.s.solanki) ravi judge

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.1824/2013 20.3.2013 Shri Pushpendra Dubey, counsel for the applicant(s).Shri Akhilendra Kumar Singh, GA, for the respondent/State.

Heard.

The applicant is in custody since 17.3.2012 in connection with Crime No.50/2010 registered at P.S.Chopana, District Betul for the offence punishable under Sections 304-B/34 of IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case.

The statement of mother of deceased Deepika has already been recorded.

She exaggerated the fact in her statement.

Same did not find place in the statement recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C.Trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicant.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer.

On due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant.

The application is allowed.

It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Committal Court/Trial Court concerned, for his appearance before the said Court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said Court during trial.

C.C.as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) ravi JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial