Devendra Kumar Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Devendra Kumar Patel vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Mar 20, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046264

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1046264
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Mar 20, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devendra Kumar Patel

Advocate Shri. O.P.Agnihotri

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

.....police).katni for offence punishable under sections 302, 201, 120-b/34 of ipc. learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicant no.2 has been falsely implicated in this case. learned counsel further submits that there is no directed evidence against him in regard to commit murder of dippu singh. as per prosecution, nothing is seized from the possession of this applicant. the material belongs to the deceased is said to have been seized from the possession of co-accused devendara kumar patel. charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time for its conclusion, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicant no.2. learned counsel for the state opposes the prayer. on due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, i am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant no.1. the application is allowed. it is directed that applicant no.2 munna alias shyam sunder lodhi shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs.30,000/- (rupees thirty thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal court/trial court concerned, for his appearance before the said court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said court during trial. c.c.as per rules. (g.s.solanki) ravi judge

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.1786/2013 20.3.2013 Shri O.P.Agnihotri, counsel for the applicants.

Shri R.K.Kesharwani, PL, for the State.

At the outset, learned counsel for the applicants prays for withdrawal of the application of applicant No.1, Devendra Kumar Patel S/o Ramdas Patel.

Prayer is allowed.

The application of applicant No.1, Devendara Kumar Patel is dismissed as withdrawn.

Heard.

This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.for grant of bail to applicant No.2, Munna alias Shyam Sunder Lodhi.

The applicant no.2 is in custody since 26.8.2012 in connection with Crime No.190/2012 registered at Police Station G.R.P.(Railway Police).Katni for offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120-B/34 of IPC.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicant No.2 has been falsely implicated in this case.

Learned counsel further submits that there is no directed evidence against him in regard to commit murder of Dippu Singh.

As per prosecution, nothing is seized from the possession of this applicant.

The material belongs to the deceased is said to have been seized from the possession of co-accused Devendara Kumar Patel.

Charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time for its conclusion, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicant No.2.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer.

On due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant No.1.

The application is allowed.

It is directed that applicant No.2 Munna alias Shyam Sunder Lodhi shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Committal Court/Trial Court concerned, for his appearance before the said Court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said Court during trial.

C.C.as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) ravi JUDGE

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Devendra Kumar Patel vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education