Jharkhand Court June 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nunulal Mandal and Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 344 of 2002 ---------- 1. Nunulal Mandal 2. Arjun Mandal Both sons of Late Thakuri Mandal, both are residents of village- Bishunpur, P.S.- Tundi, District- Dhanbad. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party ---------- With Cr. Revision No. 530 of 2002 ---------- Kanti Mandal @ Kanthi Mondal, S/o J.Mondal, R/o Village- Bishunpur, P.S.- Tundi, District- Dhanbad. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party ---------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Prabir Chatterjee, Advocate (In Cr. Revision No. 344 of 2002) : Mr. P.K. Mukhopadhyay, Advocate (In Cr. Revision No. 530 of 2002) For the State : Mr. S.K. Sharma, A.P.P. (In both the cases) ---------- C.A.V. on 10/04/2017 Pronounced on 20/06/2017 Heard Mr. Prabir Chatterjee, learned counsel for the petitioners in Cr. Revision No. 344 of 2002, Mr. P.K. Mukhopadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner i...
Amit Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2724 of 2017 Yunus Ansari Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand Opp. Party Coram: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Awanish Shekhar, Adv. For the Opp. Party : Addl. P.P. 05 /19.06.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the case has been listed under the heading for orders, it should be listed under the heading for hearing. Registry is directed to be careful in future and list this case under appropriate heading. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privi lege of anticipatory bail in connection with Itkhori P.S. Case No.106 of 2015 registered under sections 379/232/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits ...
Anjani Kumar Pandey Vs. The Regional Labour Commissioner Central and A ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (L) No. 5863 of 2015 with W.P. (L) No. 5864 of 2015 with W.P. (L) No. 5866 of 2015 with W.P. (L) No. 5873 of 2015 with W.P. (L) No. 5884 of 2015 with W.P. (L) No. 5865 of 2015 with W.P. (L) No. 5881 of 2015 --- Anjani Kumar Pandey --- ---- Petitioner [in all the cases] Versus 1. The Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Ranchi 2. M/s Hindalco Industries Limited, Lohardaga --- Respondents [in all the cases] --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Sumir Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents: M/s Nitu Sinha, Prashant Vidyarthi, CGC --- 04/ 19.06.2017 Since the sole petitioner raises common grievance of the workers in each of the respective writ petitions against rejection of their claim for payment of arrears of wages under section 20 of the Minimum Wages Act including compensation in lieu of less payment of wages against the Respondent M/s Hindalco Industries Ltd. (herein- after referred to as 'Company') ...
Pradeep Yadav Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 4265 of 2017 --- Pradeep Yadav son of Ashok Kumar Yadav resident of Village Bohara, PO & PS Poreyahat, District Godda Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : M/s. Rajendra Krishna & Jay Shankar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ajit Kumar, AAG --- 6/19.06.2017 Heard Mr. Rajendra Krishna, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned A.A.G. for the State. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Godda (M) No. 37 of 2017. It has been alleged in the FIR that a general meeting was being conducted on 05.03.2017 on the issue of environment for establishment of 1600 MW power plant by Adani Power. The hearing got concluded on 12:05 P.M. and when the people started going out from the premises, then this petitioner along with his supporters provoking the common villagers and telling them to oppose the meeti...
Deputy General Manager Bank of India Vs. Shri Parameshwar Das
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(L) No. 56 of 2016 Deputy General Manager, Bank of India, Jamshedpur Zone, Jamshedpur .... Petitioner Vrs. Shri Parameshwar Das .... Respondent with W.P.(L) No. 5049 of 2015 Parameshwar Das .... Petitioner Vrs. Deputy General Manager, Bank of India, Jamshedpur Zone, Jamshedpur .... Respondent .... CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : M/s A. Allam & Nehala Sharmin (WPL No.56/16) : Mr. Kaustav Panda (WPL No. 5049/15) For the Respondent : Mr. Kaustav Panda (WPL No.56/16) : M/s A. Allam & Nehala Sharmin (WPL No. 5049/15) 05/19.06.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The impugned award dated 26.9.2014 (Annexure-5) passed in Reference Case No. 1 of 2013, challenged by both Management of the Bank and the Workman for their own reasons reads as under:- By order No. L-12012/24/2012-IR (B-H) dated 23/11/2012 the Central Government in the Ministry of Labour has, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (d) of...
Pramod Lakra Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.511 of 2017 Pramod Lakra, S/o Late Birsa Oraon, R/o Nagratoli, P.O. & P.S. - Lalpur, District Ranchi, at present residing at Ratu Chatti, P.O. & P.S. - Ratu, District Ranchi, Jharkhand Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi 3. The S.A.R Officer, Ranchi, P.O. - Ranchi University, P.S. - Kotwali, District Ranchi. .. Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Alok Lal, Advocate Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Md. Shamim Akhtar, G.A III --------- 02/Dated:19. h June, 2017 1. This writ application has been filed for issuance of appropriate writ or direction upon the respondent No.3 to allow the application filed by the petitioner under Order XXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for abandonment and withdrawal of this case filed under Section 71A of the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act in S.A.R. Case No.122 of 2010-11, pending...
Dhana Munda and Anr. Vs. Sheikh Asruddin Ansari and Anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4577 of 2004 1. Dhana Munda 2. Sukhlal Munda @ Sukul Munda .. Petitioners Versus 1. Sheikh Asruddin Ansari 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi .. Respondents ----- CORAM HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners: Mr. Chandra Shekhar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent No.1: Mr. Bhaiya Vishwajeet Kumar, Advocate ----- 06/19.06.2017 Heard learned counsels for the parties.2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 21.07.2004 passed by the learned Munsif, Ranchi in Title Suit No. 118/2002 whereby, the petition for recall of the order dated 08.09.2003 has been dismissed. The petitioners have also prayed for recalling the order dated 08.09.2003 whereby, the learned Munsif has debarred the petitioners from filing the written statement.3. The factual matrix of the case is that the plaintiffs/respondents filed Title Suit No. 118/2002 for declaration of their right, title and interest over the su...
Shashi Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3449 of 2017 ----, Shashi Kumar ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .....Opposite Party ---- Coram: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Jit, APP ----- 03/_19__/06.2017 Heard the parties. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Mango (Olidih) P.S. Case No. 419 of 2016, G.R. Case No. 3390 of 2016. Petitioner is the informant of Mango (Olidih) P.S. Case No. 419 of 2016, who had alleged that he was a Senior Manager in Indian Overseas Bank, who had been transferred after promotion to Kolkatta. It has been stated that his wife and son used to stay in Jamshedpur. Allegation has been made that he had called his wife on mobile on 16.11.2013 but none had answered which resulted in his asking his former colleague to go and visit them. He was subsequently informed that the Flat was found to be locked. Subsequently from the balcony, his co...
Ganpat Kumar Bhagat Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 4110 of 2013 --- Bholanath Hansda @ Bhola Hansda --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department 3. The Director, Primary, Secondary and Mass Education, State of Jharkhand 4. The Secretary, Ministry of Food, Civil Supply and Consumer Affairs 5. The Accountant General, Jharkhand --- --- Respondents with W.P. (S) No. 2458 of 2008 1. Pano Devi 2. Ram Nagena Bhagal 3. Lachhani Devi 4. Sharda Devi 5. Anjani Kumari 6. Munita Kumari 7. Guriya Kumari --- ---- Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary, Education Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. Secretary, Food Material, Public Distribution & Consumer Forum Department, Govt. of Jharkhand.3. Accountant General, Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. Director, Public Education Department, Jharkhand 5. Sub Divisional Education Officer, Giridih --- --- Respondents with W.P. (S) No. 2905 of 2008 --- Sadhu Charan ...
Rukmini Devi Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 4110 of 2013 --- Bholanath Hansda @ Bhola Hansda --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department 3. The Director, Primary, Secondary and Mass Education, State of Jharkhand 4. The Secretary, Ministry of Food, Civil Supply and Consumer Affairs 5. The Accountant General, Jharkhand --- --- Respondents with W.P. (S) No. 2458 of 2008 1. Pano Devi 2. Ram Nagena Bhagal 3. Lachhani Devi 4. Sharda Devi 5. Anjani Kumari 6. Munita Kumari 7. Guriya Kumari --- ---- Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary, Education Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. Secretary, Food Material, Public Distribution & Consumer Forum Department, Govt. of Jharkhand.3. Accountant General, Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. Director, Public Education Department, Jharkhand 5. Sub Divisional Education Officer, Giridih --- --- Respondents with W.P. (S) No. 2905 of 2008 --- Sadhu Charan ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »