Jharkhand Court June 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dilip Kumar Jha Vs. Haradhan Mahato and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.R No.35 of 2013 --- Dilip Kumar Jha,s/o late Birendra Bhusan Jha, r/o Satsang(Mahabir Colony), P.O.P.S. and District-Deoghar. ..Petitioner. Versus 1. Haradhan Mahato son of Late Fulu Mahato by faith- Hindu by occupation Cultivation R/o Saraidhela. P.O. & P.S. Dhanbad 2. Dalu Mahto ( since deceased after passing of decree) 2. (a) Maga Prasad Mahato son of Dalu Mahato, resident of Saraidhela, P.O. & P.S. Dhanbad, District Dhanbad 2. (b) Khriya Devi W/o Late Mani Ram Mahto D/o Late Dalu Mahto, resident of Raghunathpur P.S. Baliapur, District Dhanbad 2. (c ) Perki Devi W/o Sri Bipin Mahato, D/o Late Dalu Mahato R/o Dhangi P.S. Baliapur District Dhanbad 2. (d) Malti Devi W/o Late Bipin Mahato D/o Late Dalu Mahato, resident of Dharambandh, P.S. Madhuban District Dhanbad 3. Gopal Krishan S/o Mr. Basudeo Poonicker, Qtr. No. 25 Jagjiwan Nagar, Dhanbad 4. Mrs. Surmati Verma W/o C.K Verma. M...
Jagdish Chandra Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2017
1 W.P. (S) No. 5817 of 2008 In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Jagdish Chandra, s/o-Late Mangru Ram, reisdent of House No. 265/C, Road No. 1-B, Ashok Nagar Colony, P.S.-Argora, District-Ranchi Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 3.The Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 4.The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 5.The Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department-cum-Enquiry Officer, Ranchi. Respondent. For the Petitioner : - M/s. Nilendu Kumar and Anil Kumar Srivastava, Advocates. For the Respondent-State: - Mr. Himanshu Kumar Mehta, A.A.G. and Ms. Kanchan Kumari, J.C. to A.A.G. P R E S E N T: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK. C.A.V. On : - 17/02/2017 Delivered On :21. 06/2017 ... Per Pramath Patnaik, J.In the accompanied writ application, the petitioner has, inter alia,...
Management of Jharkhand State Vs. Workman Represented by the Gen
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(L) No. 3117 of 2012 --- The Management of Jharkhand State Co-operative Lac Marketing and Procurement Federation Ltd. (LAMPF), through its Managing Director, Ranchi. --- ---- Petitioner Versus The Workman represented by the General Secretary, Jharkhand General Kamgar Union, Chutia, Ranchi. --- --- Respondent --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, Adv. For the Respondent : In Person. ---- 07/21.06.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent- Union represented through its General Secretary. The following reference was made to the learned Labour Court, Ranchi by notification dated 08th September, 2009 issued by the Department of Labour, Employment and Training, Government of Jharkhand (Annexure-1) :- (i) Whether not to make the services of 09 adhoc employee (list enclosed) permanent is justified? If not what relief the workman is entitled to? (ii) Whether the pay...
M/S Bihar State Mineral Development Corporation Limited Vs. Regional L ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(L) No. 4828 of 2001 M/s Bihar State Mineral Development Corporation Limited, Ranchi .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Regional Labour Commissioner (C), Dhanbad-cum-Authority under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 2. The Labour Enforcement Officer (C)-cum-Inspector under the Minimum Wages Act, Ranchi .. Respondents ----- CORAM HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K.Mehta, Advocate For the Respondents: None ----- 08/21.06.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.2. No one appears on behalf of the respondents despite service of notice.3. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 15.05.2001 passed by the respondent No.1 in Application No. M. W. Claim (71/90) [Annexure-5 to the writ petition] whereby, the claim application filed under Section 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 was allowed and the petitioner was directed to make payment of Rs.1,19,527.17 (less payment + comp...
Banwari Hazam and Ors Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation and O
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (L) No. 2549 of 2012 1. Banwari Hazam 2. Darshan Mohli 3. Nepal Mandal 4. Bimal Haldar 5. Tara Pado Dutta 6. Parimal Chandra Pal 7. Jhari Sao 8. Jaleshwar Mohli 9. Manik Lal Gorai ..... Petitioners vs. 1. The Damodar Valley Corporation through its Secretary 2. The Chairman, Damodar Valley Corporation 3. The Director, Human Resources and Development Department, Damodar Valley Corporation No.1 to 3 4. The Chief Engineer, Chandrapura Thermal Power Station, Damodar Valley Corporation 5. The Deputy General Manager (Administration), Chandrapura Thermal Power Station, Damodar Valley Corporation 6. The Senior Personnel Manager, Chandrapura Thermal Power Station, Damodar Valley Corporation 7. The Canteen Managing Committee of Chandrapura Thermal Power Station, Damodar Valley Corporation, Chandrapura 8. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Labour, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 9. ...
Dr Ram Naresh Jha Vs. Health Medical Education and Family Welfare Dept
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2017
1 W.P. (S) No. 3439 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 3439 of 2013 ============================================================= Dr. Ram Naresh Jha, son of late Satyadeo Narayan Jha, resident of Tower Road, Nawabang, 1st Land, P.O., P.S. & District Hazaribagh. Petitioner VERSUS1 The State of Jharkhand.2. The Principal Secretary, Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi. ... Respondents. ============================================================= For Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Sr. Advocate Mr. Shresth Gautam, Advocate Mr. Shray Mishra, Advocate Mr. Gaurav, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Shivani Verma, J.C. to A.G. ============================================================= CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK C.A.V. on 24.04.2017 Pronounced on 20/06/ 2017 Dr. S.N. Patnak, J.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.2. ...
Pabrit Poddar and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2017
Criminal Revision No. 637 of 2002 Against the judgment dated 23.09.2002 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Deoghar in Criminal Appeal No. 67 of 1997 --- 1.Pabrit Poddar son of Late Bisu Poddar 2.Sita Ram Sah son of Late Bisan Sah 3.Lalu Rana son of Late Surju Rana 4.Ganesh Sah son of Late Bishan Sah 5.Gunadhar Mandal son of Fekan Mandal 6.Jay Narain Poddar son of Late Bishu Poddar 7.Lakheshwar Rana son of hari Rana 8.Shital Rana son of Hari Rana 9.Kishun Rana son of Hari Rana 10.Nuneshwar Rana son of Hari Rana 11.Sanjay Sah son of Late Bishan Sah 12.Jayo Rana son of Lalu Rana 13.Lakhi Narain Sah son of Late Bishan Sah 14.Mukund Murari Mandal son of Gunadhar Mandal all resident of village Deoghar bad, PS Sarath, PO Patharda, District Deoghar Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Jamadar Rana son of Lilu Rana, resident of village Deogarbad PO Patharda, PS Sarath, Dist. Deoghar Opposite Parties --- For the Petitioners : Mr. K. K. Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party No. 1 ...
Bijay Jaiswal Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2017
Criminal Revision No. 484 of 2002 Against the judgment dated 19.06.2002 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 36 of 2001 by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Bokaro --- Bijay Jaiswal son of Amarlal Jaiswal resident of Mohalla Kailash Nagar, Chas, PO & PS Chas, District Bokaro Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- For the Petitioner : Mr. B. K. Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ram Prakash Singh, A.P.P. --- Present: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- C. A. V. ON 12.04.2017 PRONOUNCED ON 20.06.2017 By Court: Heard Mr. B. K. Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Prakash Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State.2. This application is directed against the judgment dated 19.06.2002 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 36 of 2001 by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Bokaro by which the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned 2nd Assistant Sessions Judge, Bokaro at Chas in S. T. No. 69 of 2001 whereby and wh...
Rekha Devi Agrawal Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2333 of 2010 ----- Rekha Devi Agrawal W/o Murlidhar Agrawal, D/o late Shyam Sundar Lal, resident of Upper Bazar, Mahavir Chowk, Lohardaga, PO, PS and District-Lohardaga .... Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The District & Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh 3. The Registrar, Civil Court, Hazaribagh.... Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Adv. For the Resp.-State : Mr. Arbind Kumar, JC to G.P-II ----- 19/20.06.2017 During pendency of the writ petition, the original petitioner died and vide order dated 20.12.2012 his daughter namely, Rekha Devi Agrawal has been substituted.2. Seeking a direction for payment of salary during suspension period and for payment of retiral benefits, the original petitioner approached this Court. He was put under suspension vide order dated 30.06.1986 and a departmental proceeding was initiated on the a...
Arun Kumar Burnwal Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 277 of 2001 --- Arun Kumar Burnwal, son of Mathura Lal, resident of village Koderma, P.S. Koderma, District Koderma Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through Food Inspector, Koderma Opp. Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. P. D. Agrawal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sudhansu Kumar Deo, A.P.P. --- 08/20.06.2017 Heard Mr. P. D. Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Sudhansu Kumar Deo, learned A.P.P. for the State. This application is directed against the judgment dated 02.05.2001 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Koderma in Criminal Appeal No. 44 of 1991 whereby and whereunder the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed in Case No. G347 of 1988 convicting the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 16(i)(a) (ii) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1955 and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprison...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »