Jharkhand Court June 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Asha Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3038 of 2017 Sabana @ Sana Khatoon ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opp. Party ------ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner: Mr. S.K. Roy, Advocate For the State : Addl. P.P. ------ 2/28.06.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as has been mentioned in the order dated 29.4.2016 passed by this Court in A.B.A. No. 537 of 2016, the anticipatory bail application of this petitioner was withdrawn because the process under Sections 82 and 83 Cr. P.C. has already been issued and executed against her. Therefore, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3031 of 2017 Jitendra Prasad @ Jeetu Madhesiya ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opp. Party ------ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTI...
M/S Tinplate Recreation Associ Vs. Sri Pranav Kumar Sinha
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (L) No. 2644 of 2010 M/s Tinplate Recreation Association P.O. + P.S. Golmuri, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum represented through its President Shri S.G. Rebello, ... Petitioner Versus Sri Pranav Kumar Sinha son of Gunadhar Sinha resident of village Penchala, P.O. Dumar Tor, C/o Tarenga, P.S. Raipur, Dist. Bakura, West Bengal .. ... Respondent --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Jai Prakash, Sr. Advocate Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate 14/28.06.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the judgment dated 13.03.2010 in BS Case No. 10/96 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Jamshedpur, whereby the complaint filed by the respondent was allowed and the petitioner was directed to reinstate the respondent and to pay him back wages within 60 days from the date of the judgment, failing wh...
Raju Mehta Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-22-2017
submitted that the co-accused has been granted regular bail by the Hon'ble Court. After hearing the parties and gone through the record, it appears that Section 365 is not attracted against the petitioner as the parties are business partnership and no money has been ......... and only allegation against the petitioner is intimidate. Under the facts and circumstance petitioner is hereby directed to surrender before the court below within four weeks and thereafter the court below shall pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Anant Bijay Singh, J.) Fahim/- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J) 1097 of 2017 Kundan Singh ..... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Appellants : Mr. Vishnu Kumar Sharma, Adv. For the O.P. : APP --------- 02/Dated:22. 06.2017 I.A. No.4938 of 2017 The pres...
Anita Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-22-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 933 of 2007 Anita Mahto .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara 3. The Circle Officer Block-Nala, District-Jamtara 4. The District Welfare Officer, Jamtara .. Respondents ----- CORAM HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner: Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Shaid Khan, S.C (Mines) ----- 10/22.06.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 01.06.2006 passed by the respondent No.2 by reasons of which the representation of the petitioner, filed in pursuance of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 4605/2005, has been rejected. The petitioner has also prayed for issuance of a direction upon the respondent No.2 not to act in pursuance of the order dated 01.06.2006 whereby the representation of the petitioner for grant of Schedule Tribe certificate has been ...
Dasrath Mahto Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No.788 of 2016 with I.A. No.2942 of 2017 Dasrath Mahto .... Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Nimai Mahato .... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA For the Appellant : Mr. Kumar Nilesh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, APP ----- 8/22.06.2017 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.2. This appeal has been filed by the informant-appellant against the Judgment of acquittal dated 2.6.2016, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dhanbad, in S.T. No.119 of 2015, acquitting respondent No.2 from the charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The respondent No.2, however, has been convicted for the offence under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to the period already under gone by him in custody during trial, i.e., one year and two months.3. According to the prosecution case as disclosed in the i...
Upendra Das and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-22-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI L.P.A. No. 196 of 2004 1. Upendra Das 2. Kamdeo Das 3. Muni Das 4. Naresh Das 5. Jagdish Das 6. Sikandar Das 7. Ram Prasad Das 8. Shambhu Ravidas 9. Gholtan Das 10. Fucho Das 11. Bodan Das 12. Shiro Das 13. Shukar Das 14. Gopal Das 15. Jaykant Das 16. Katki Das 17. Basu Das 18. Mani Harijan 19. Birendra Harijan 20. Daso Harijan ...Appellants Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. The Commissioner, Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka.3. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda.4. Sub Divisional Officer, Godda.5. The Circle Officer, Godda.6. The 16 Annas Raiyat of Mouza Belari, through Pradhan Shrimant Mirdha @ Yadav 7. Gokul Harijan 8. Naresh Das 9. Bhakan Ravidas 10. Sudan Ravidas 11. Lochan Harijan 12. Narayan Harijan 13. Satish Harijan @ Chhatish Harijan 14. Sita Ram Das 15. Lewari Das 16. Devari Das 17. Khublal Das ...Respondents --- CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA --- For the Appellants : M/s. Rahul Kr. Gupta & M...
Arjun Singh Vs. Area Estate Manager, Katras Pr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.7889 of 2006 ----- Arjun Singh, son of Late Satya Narain Singh, resident of Bhandaridih, Chhatbad, P.O. Katrasgarh, P.S. Katras, District Dhanbad. . Petitioner. -Versus- 1. Area Estate Manager, Katras Project Area of M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., P.S. Katras, P.O. Katrasgarh, District Dhanbad.2. M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited, subsidiary of M/s. Coal India Ltd., having its registered office at Koyla Bhawan, P.O. Koyla Nagar, P.S. Saraidhola, District Dhanbad. .... Respondents. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A. K. Mehta, Advocate ------ 05/22.06.2017: The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of writ of certiorari for setting aside the judgment dated 27th May, 2006 passed by the Additional District Judge-VI, Dhanbad in Misc. Appeal No.9 of 1992 by reason of which ex- parte order dated 20th February, 1992 passed by the Estate ...
Sugan Kumari and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-22-2017
CR. APPEAL (S.J.) No. 589 of 2003 -------- [arising out of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18th February, 2003 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Gumla in Sessions Trial No.212 of 1994] ----- 1. Sugan Kumari daughter of Sukhram Lohra.2. Sukhram Lohra son of late Manraj Lohra 3. Etwa Lohra son of Sukhram Lohra All are residents of Village Boreykera, Police Station Basia, District Gumla. Appellants -versus- The State of Jharkhand Respondent ---- PRESENT : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ---- For the Appellants : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Ravi Kumar Singh, APP ------ Per Justice Ananda Sen, This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of sentence dated 18 th day of February, 2003 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Gumla in Sessions Trial No.212 of 1994, by which the appellants have been convicted for offence under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment ...
Mohit Prasad Vs. M/S Lakhi Egg Roll Shop and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(L) No. 2908 of 2010 --- Mohit Prasad --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. M/s. Lakhi Egg Roll Shop, Sakchi, Jamshedpur 2. Lakhi Kant Mahapartra --- --- Respondents --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, Adv. For the Respondents : ---- 06/21.06.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Respondents, despite service of notice, have not entered appearance. By the impugned order dated 06.02.2010 learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Jamshedpur has rejected the claim of the petitioner for reinstatement along with back wages and other consequential benefits in B.S. Case No. 13 of 2002 (Annexure-5). Facts, in brief, as carved out from the pleadings on record are as follows:- (i) Petitioner claimed to have joined as a Cook on monthly wages of Rs. 1800/- per month from 15 th January, 1997. He has alleged termination by the opposite parties/respondents with effect from 09th July, 2002 ...
Sanjay Kumar Ram Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 5473 of 2008 Sanjay Kumar Ram, son of late Sukhlal Mochi, (No.92002818, Ex-CT-74-BN BSF), Resident of village-Pochi, PO-Satobarwa, PS-Daltonganj, Sadar, District- Palamu. .... Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India.2. The Director General, BSF, New Delhi.3. The Commandant 74 B.N. B.S.F., Bhitawa Camp Bareilly, U.P. ... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK --- For the Petitioners : M/s Manoj Tondon, Shiv Shankar Kumar, Ramesh Anand & Micky Kumar, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Prashant Kr. Singh, Sr. C.G.C & Mr. Madan Prasad, C.G.C ----- CAV on 09/12/2016 Pronounced on 21/06/2017 Per Pramath Patnaik, J.In the accompanied writ application, the petitioner has interalia prayed for quashing the order dated 29 th November, 2007 passed by Commandant 74 Battalion BSF, Bhitama Camp Barilly, U.P. pertaining to dismissal from services on the ground of plural marriage and has further prayed for quashing the order date...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »