Jharkhand Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prahlad Prasad Sah and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5970 of 2017 1. Prahlad Prasad Sah 2. Muchkund Kumar @ Mukchun Sah 3. Pawan Sah @ Pawan Kumar Sah 4. Vikash Sah @ Vikash Kumar Sah 5. Uma Shankar Sah @ Uma Shankar Gupta Petitioners versus The State of Jharkhand Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY -------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Addl. P.P. --------- Order No. 02: Dated:6. h November, 2017 Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Palajori P.S. Case No. 138 of 2015 (G.R. No. 1121 of 2015) registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 279, 427, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners by drawing the attention of this Court at page 27 to 29 of the brief, which is also copies of the bail bond submitted by the petitioners before police, submits that petitioners 1,3 & 5 were gran...
Priya Mala Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (Cr.) No. 120 of 2016 --- Priya Mala daughter of Late Pramod Mishra, Proprietor, Herbal Heritage, resident of Flat No. 3A, Sona Apartment, Road No. 1, Kishore Ganj, PO & PS Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Chief Regional Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, 1st Floor, Shanti Deep Tower, Radium Road, Kutchery Chowk, PO & PS Sadar, Ranchi -834001 (Jharkhand) 3.The Branch Manager, Kishoreganj Branch, Indian Overseas Bank, 374-B, Opposite Hyundai Show Room Kishoreganj, PO GPO, PS Sukhdeonagar, Ranchi 834001 (Jharkhand) 4.The Union of India through Credit Gurantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises, at 1002-1003, Naman Centre, 10th Floor, Plot No. C-31, G-Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East) PO & PS Bandra (East), Mumbai 400051 5.The Officer-In-Charge, Sukhdeo Nagar Police Station, Ranchi, PO & PS Ranchi, District Ranchi Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --...
Biraj Ekka ? Biraj Kerketta Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
1 Cr. Revision No. 1100 of 2005 --- Against the judgment dated 9.6.2004, passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Gumla in Cr. Appeal No. 71 of 2000. ----- Biraj Ekka @ Biraj Kerketta, Son of Sri Julius Kerketta, resident of village-Latha Bartoli, P.S. Gumla, District-Gumla. ......Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. .Opposite Party --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Niki Sinha, APP ----- PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- 05/6/11/2017 Heard the parties. This application is directed against the judgment dated 9.6.2004, passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Gumla in Cr. Appeal No. 71 of 2000, whereby and whereunder judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 25.11.2000, passed by the learned 1st Assistant Sessions Judge, Gumla in Sessions Trial No. 175 of 1986 convicting the petitioner for the offence under sections 376 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him accordingly has been ...
Naresh Prasad Keshri Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1661 of 2010 Naresh Prasad Keshri Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ... .. Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK ----- For Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Raunak Sahay, JC to AAG ------ 03/ 06.11.2017 The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for quashing the Office Order No. 8 dated 11.02.2010 (Annexure-5) issued by the Office of the respondent No. 5, whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been deputed to the post of Accounts Clerk without extending financial benefits of the said post. The petitioner was appointed as typist on dailywages under the respondent no. 5 in the year 1980. In the year, 1984, the petitioner was appointed as Choukidar in the work charge Establishment. It is stated that as the petitioner was efficient in typing, he performed the work of typist since 1984 in the said Department/office. On 22.12.1991, the Establishment Committe...
Ganesh Munda and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
1 Cr. Revision No. 50 of 2006 --- Against the judgment dated 27.4.2004, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa in Cr. Appeal No. 39 of 2003. ----- 1. Ganesh Munda, Son of late Cheta Parsuram Munda.2. Moti Lal Munda, Son of late Cheta Parsuram Munda.3. Durga Munda, Son of late Cheta Parsuram Munda.4. Pokan Munda, Son of late Cheta Parsuram Munda.5. Sahadeo Munda, Son of Sri Ganesh Munda.6. Natbar Munda, Son of Sri Ganesh Munda.7. Sube Munda, Wife of Sri Ganesh Munda.8. Sona Muda, W/o Sri Durga Munda.9. Jambi Munda, W/o Sri Pokan Munda. All residents of village-Nalita, P.S. Toklo, District-Singhbhum West. ......Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Chandrabati Munda, W/o late Motilal Munda, Resident of village- Nalita, P.S. Tokio, District-Singhbhum West. .Opposite Parties --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate For the State : APP For O.P. No. 2 : None ----- PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- 10/6/11/2017 Heard Mr. Yogesh ...
Dilawar Hussain and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 1035 of 2005 --- 1. Dilawar Hussain, son of Late Sultan Mian, 2. Kurban Ansari, son of Dilawar Hussain, 3. Budhan Mian, son of Late Sahamat Mian 4. Rijwan Ansari, son of Budhan Mian, 5. Jafar Ali Mian, son of Sahamat Mian, 6. Amjad Ansari, son of Jafarali Mian, 7. Yusuf Ansari, son of Late Rahman Ansari 8. Madan Ansari, son of Jafal Ali Mian, 9. Muslim Ansari, son of Hanif Mian 10. Habib Ansari, son of Khosali Mian, all resident of Betulkhurd, P.S. Gola, District Hazaribag Petitioners Versus State of Jharkhand Opp. Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioners : None For the State : Mr. Ram Prakash Singh, A.P.P. --- 05/06.11.2017 None appears on behalf of the petitioners. However, Mr. Ram Prakash Singh, learned A.P.P., is present. This application is directed against the judgment dated 27.07.2005 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh in Criminal Appeal No. 119 of 1990...
Aryan Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7540 of 2017 Aryan Kumar Petitioner versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Union of India, Narcotics Control Bureau Opp. Parties -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY -------- For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Karmakar, Advocate For the State : Addl. P.P. For the UOI, N.C.B. : Spl. P.P. --------- Order No. 04 : Dated:6. h November, 2017 The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Special Case No. 03 of 2017 registered under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B) of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985. Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that 15.550 Kgs. of Ganja has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is, further, submitted that conditions laid down in section 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act was not complied with at the time of search of the petitioner, therefore, the petitioner may be released on bail. The learned Special P.P. opposes the prayer for...
Umesh Goshwami and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
1 Cr. Revision No. 1194 of 2005 --- Against the judgment dated 16.10.2004, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 1, Chatra in Cr. Appeal No. 28 of 2003. ----- 1. Umesh Goshwami, Son of Sita Ram Goswami.2. Sita Ram Goswami, Son of late Rajo Goswami. Both are residents of village-Guruwa, P.S. Guruwa, District- Gaya, Bihar. ......Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. .Opposite Party --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ram Prakash Singh, APP ----- PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- 05/_6/11/2017 Heard the parties. This application is directed against the judgment dated 16.10.2004, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 1, Chatra in Cr. Appeal No. 28 of 2003, whereby and whereunder judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 6.8.2003, passed by the learned S.D.J.M, Chatra in Complaint Case No. 191 of 1997, convicting the petitioners for the offence under section ...
Radhe Krishna Giluka Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
1 Cr. Revision No. 618 of 2005 --- Against the judgment dated 17.02.2005, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Dumka in G.R. Case No. 959 of 1992. ----- Radhe Krishna Giluka, Son of late Ram Narayan Giluka, Resident of Main Road, Dumka Town, P.O. and P.S. Dumka Town, District-Dumka. ......Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Pradeep Mukherjee, Son of not known to the petitioner.3. Md. Raja, Son of not known to the petitioner.4. Subhash Ranjan Roy, Son of not known to the petitioner.5. Dilip Tapaswi, Son of not known to the petitioner.6. Stensila Kisku, daughter of not known to the petitioner.2. to 6 all teachers of Sishu Niketan School, Dumka Town, P.O. and P.S. Dumka, District-Dumka. .Opposite Parties --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Nikhil Ranjan, Advocate For the State : APP For O.P. Nos. 2 to 6 : Mr. S.P. Jha, Sr. Advocate ----- PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- 07/_6/11/2017 Heard the parties. This application is directed against the judgme...
Kamal Kumar Patnaik and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1074 of 2017 ..1. Kamal Kumar Patnaik, son of Praful Patnaik 2. Debasish Chakraborty, son of K.K. Chakraborty . Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. The Deputy Commissioner, Jamshedpur. . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N. PATHAK. For the Petitioners : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Raunak Sahay, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. R.K. Shahi, JC to AAG07 Dated 6th November, 2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.2. The petitioners have approached this court with a prayer for quashing the orders dated 20.02.2014 and 19.02.2014, whereby the respondents have rejected the claim of the petitioners regarding full salary after exoneration.3. The factual matrix in narrow compass is that petitioner No. 1 is working as Assistant in the office of C.O. Dalbhumgarh and petitioner No. 2 is working as Head Clerk in Chakulia Block. It has further been stated that a crimi...