Jharkhand Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharat Mahto and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 893 of 2005 --- 1. Bharat Mahto son of late Kali Mahto 2. Karu Mahto son of late Kali Mahto 3. Jhabban Mahto son of late Kali Mahto 4. Amrit Mahto son of Bharat Mahto, all are resident of village Kathghari, P.S. - Madhupur, Subdivision Madhupur District- Deoghar Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opp. Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar Deo, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. --- 04/06.11.2017 Heard Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar Deo, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Ms. Vandana Bharti, learned A.P.P. This application is directed against the judgment dated 12.07.2005 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 38 of 2003 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. - V, Deoghar whereby and whereunder the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhupur at Deoghar in G....
Avinash Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 1421 of 2014 ---- Avinash Kumar, Son of late Birendra Kumar, Resident of Gumla-Jaspur Road, P.O. & P.S. Gumla, District-Gumla. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opposite Party ---- Coram: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Laxmi Murmu, APP ----- 12/6/11/2017 Heard the parties. In this application, petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 281 of 2013 including the order dated 19.2.2014, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gumla, whereby and whereunder cognizance has been taken for the offence under sections 5 (2)6/23/25/29, 18(VIII) Preconception and Pre natal Diagnostic Techniques Prohibition of Sex Selection Act (Hereinafter referred to as the Act). A complaint case was instituted wherein it was alleged that Vidyavasisni Ultrasound Clinic was inspected and...
Sabitri Devi and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 266 of 2016 --- 1. Sabitri Devi, wife of Jagdish Tiwari, 2. Jagdish Tiwari, son of late Ram Briksh Tiwari, 3. Ajit Kumar Tiwari, son of Jagdish Tiwari, all are resident of village, P.O. Baidakala, P. S. Patan, District - Palamau Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sachitanand Dubey, son of late Rajeshwar Dubey, resident of village, P.O. Barigaon, P.S. Bishrampur, District - Palamau Opp. Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Nagmani Tiwari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma, A.P.P. --- 06/06.11.2017 Heard Mr. Nagmani Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma, learned A.P.P. for the State. In this application the petitioners have prayed for quashing the order dated 15.12.2015 passed in Criminal Revision No. 38 of 2012 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge IV, Palamau at Daltonganj by virtue of which the order dated 2...
Ram Raj Mahto and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 216 of 2005 --- 1. Ram Raj Mahto son of Yadunandan Mahto 2. Nand Kishor Prasad son of Santoshi Mahto, both residents of Purna Majhiganwan, Police Station Chainpur, District Palamau Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opp. Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Abhishek Prasad, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. --- 06/06.11.2017 Heard Mr. Abhishek Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. This application is directed against the judgment dated 10.12.2004 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 191 of 1994 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Palamau whereby and whereunder the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 26.11.1994 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Daltonganj in connection with G. R. Case No. 1551 of 1987 convicting the petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 418, 419, 420 and 468 of the Ind...
Hriday Narayam Lal and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
Criminal Revision No. 1091 of 2005 Against the judgment dated 13.06.2005 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 2001 by the learned 1 st Additional Sessions Judge, Deoghar affirming the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Madhupur at Deoghar in connection with Madhupur P. S. Case No. 194 of 1996. --- 1.Hriday Narayan Lal son of Late Megha Lal 2.Vikram @ Vikram Kumar son of Hriday Narayan Lal 3.Santosh @ Laddu Lal son of Late Girja Shankar Lal 4.Rukmani Devi wife of Hriday Narayan Lal all resident of village Pathrol, PS Madhupur, District Deoghar Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mrs. Niki Sinha, A.P.P. --- Present: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- 06.11.2017 Heard Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mrs. Niki Sinha, learned A.P.P. for the State.2. This application is directed against the judgment date...
Lagan Choudhary ? Ram Lagan Choudhary and Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
1 Cr. Revision No. 68 of 2006 --- Against the judgment dated 21.6.2005, passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj in Cr. Appeal No. 41 of 1993. ----- 1. Lagan Choudhary @ Ram Lagan Choudhary, Son of late Dewa Choudhary.2. Birju Choudhary @ Birjhu Choudhary, Son of Gulam Choudhary. Both residents of Village-Lahar Banzari, P.S. Bishrampur, District-Palamau. ......Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. .Opposite Party --- For the Petitioners : None For the State : APP ----- PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- 14/_6/11/2017 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. However, learned A.P.P is present. As this matter is pending since 2006, same is being disposed of based on the materials available on record. This application is directed against the judgment dated 21.6.2005, passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj in Cr. Appeal No. 41 of 1993, whereby and whereunder judgement and order of conviction and ...
Aamir Chand Sao Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
1 Cr. Revision No. 522 of 2005 --- Against the judgment dated 15.02.2005, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Latehar in Cr. Appeal No. 20 of 2004. ----- Aamir Chand Sao, Son of Ram Briksh Sao, Resident of Pokhri Kala, P.S. Barwadih, District-Latehar. ......Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Vijay Sonar, S/o late Jagarnath Sonar, Resident of village- Pokhari Kala, P.S. Barwadih, District-Latehar. .Opposite Parties --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Prakash Singh, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For O.P. No. 2 : Mr. P.A.N. Roy, Advocate ----- PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- 13/_6/11/2017 Heard the parties. This application is directed against the judgment dated 15.02.2005, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Latehar, in Cr. Appeal No. 20 of 2004, whereby and whereunder the appeal preferred by the opposite party no. 2 against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 26.4.2004, passe...
Mahendra Paswan Vs. Smt. Meena Devi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 22 of 2003 Mahendra Paswan --- Appellant Versus Smt. Meena Devi --- Respondent --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.B. MANGALMURTI For the Appellant : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate Mr. Prabir Chatterjee, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Arpan Mishra, Advocate 28/06.11.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The appellant-husband is aggrieved by the dismissal of the Title (Matrimonial) Suit No. 226 of 2000 by the impugned judgment and decree dated 19.02.2003 / 03.03.2003 rendered by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dhanbad. Suit for dissolution of marriage was instituted on the grounds of adultery, cruelty and desertion in terms of Section 13(1)(i)(i-a)(i- b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The marriage between the parties was solemnized in 1979 at Gaya (Bihar) and second marriage (Gowna) was solemnized on 11.11.1980. As per the case of the plaintiff three children were blessed out ...
The Governing Body of the Delhi Public School Through Its Secretary Ra ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 4868 of 2017 The Governing Body of the Delhi Public School, Greater Ranchi at Neori Vikash, Mesra, P.O.Mesra, P.S.Ormanjhi, DistrictRanchi through its Secretary, Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, son of Shri B.B. Srivastava, resident of 2nd floor, 5/7 Sarvpriya Vihar, P.O.Haus Khas, P.S.Malviyanagar, DistrictNew Delhi... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Department of Schooling Education and Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, H.E.C., P.O.Dhurwa, P.S.Jagannathpur, DistrictRanchi 3. The Deputy Director Secondary Education, Department of Schooling Education and Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, H.E.C., P.O.Dhurwa, P.S.Jagannathpur, District Ranchi 4. The Dsitrict Education Officer, Ranchi, P.O.G.P.O., P.S.Kotwali, DistrictRanchi ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For t...
Upendra Kumar Vs. Forest
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-06-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 6007 of 2017 Upendra Kumar Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK ----- For Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey-2, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Suman Kr. Ghosh, Advocate Mr. Tejo Mistry, Advocate 02/ 06.11.2017 The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for appointment to the post of Forest Guard in view of Jharkhand Forest Guard, Competitive Exam, 2014. The factual exposition as has been delineated in the writ petitioner is that the petitioner passed his matriculation examination in the year 2003 from Jharkhand Secondary Examination Board, Ranchi and further passed Sahityabhushan Examination (Equivalent to intermediate) in the year 2011 from Hindi Vidyapith, Deoghar, Jharkhand. It is further stated that in view of Advertisement No. 03/2014, the petitioner applied on 18.11.2014 for the district of Garhwa. As per the advertisement, total 2204 vac...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »