Jharkhand Court November 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dashrath Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-09-2017
Criminal Revision No. 371 of 2006 Against the judgment dated 12.12.2003 passed by the learned A.S.J., FTC VII, Hazaribagh in Criminal Appeal No. 151 of 1995 whereby and whereunder the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned trial court on 31.08.1995 in Complaint Case No. 86 of 1992 --- Dashrath Mahto son of Likhu Mahto resident of village Balsagra, PS Mandu, District Hazaribagh Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Tilu @ Tilwa Devi wife of Dashrath Mahto resident of village Balsagra, PS Mandu, District Hazaribagh Opposite Parties --- For the Petitioner : Mrs. Jashodhara Tripathy, Advocate For the Opposite Party No. 2 : Mr. Shree Niwas Roy, A.P.P. --- Present: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- By Court: Heard Mrs. Jashodhara Tripathy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shree Niwas Roy, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.2. This application is directed against the judgment dated 12.12.2003 passed by the learned A.S.J., FT...
Rahul Kumar Das Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No. 3257 of 2017 Rahul Kumar Das .........Petitioner Vrs. The State of Jharkhand & others .......... Respondents .... CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. B. MANGALMURTI For the Petitioner : In person For the Respondents : Mr. R.R. Mishra, G.P.II0308.11.2017 This is an epistolary petition, which we have taken up in a larger public interest as it raises serious concern about the life and safety of ordinary pedestrians using the public roads in Ranchi.2. The incidence of death of the sole parent i.e. Most. Malini Sengupta, aged 38 years, mother of 5 years old girl on 30.1.2017 taken place at the busy intersection in the Ranchi town known as Kantatoli Chouk and another incidence of the same date of a 4 year old child who was crushed to death in a busy road at Ratu area by an incoming vehicle not only raises serious humanitarian concern but also raises important issue in relation to the regulation of burgeon...
Bahadur Mahto Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1183 of 2016 with I. A. No. 7362 of 2016 (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 26.7.2016 and Order of sentence dated 29.7.2016 passed by learned Addl. Judicial Commissioner-VI, Ranchi, in Sessions Trial No. 312 of 2012). ------------- Bahadur Mahto . . Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand .. Respondent -------- For the Appellant : M/s Binod Kumar Singh & Rajendra Ram Ravidas, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr. S.K. Tiwari, A.P.P. -------- PRESENT : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ------- By Court:- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State. Though today this case is listed 'For Orders' on the interlocutory application for granting bail to the appellant, but we find from the record that this appeal can be disposed of at this stage itself. The LCR is also available, and we have gone through it.2. This appeal is directed against the Judgment of conviction dat...
Anjani Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-08-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1015 of 2015 Anjani Kumar Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH For the Petitioners :Mr. B.M. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Naveen Kr. Jaiswal, Advocate For the State :A.P.P. ..... 13/Dated: 08/11/2017 1. The petitionerAnjani Kumar is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sadar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 18 of 2015, corresponding to G.R. No. 100 of 2015 for the offence under sections 406, 409, 419, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Court.2. This case has been lodged on the basis of written report of one Luis Toppo, District Cooperative Officer, Hazaribagh alleging therein that the petitioner is the owner of Sankat Mochan Rice Mill Pvt. Ltd. It is further alleged that he was directed to purchase paddy by the government from different PACS. As per direction the informant purchased paddy fr...
Janeshwar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-08-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 532 of 2007. (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 16.03.2007 and Order of sentence dated 17.03.2007, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-II, Latehar, in S.T. No. 125 of 2005). ..... Janeshwar Singh .. Appellant. Versus The State of Jharkhand. .. Respondent. ------ PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ------ For the Appellant : Mrs. Supriya Dayal. Advocate. Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandney-II, A.P.P. ...... By Court:- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Addl. P.P. for the State.2. The sole appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction dated 16.03.2007 and Order of sentence dated 17.03.2007, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-II, Latehar, in S.T. No. 125 of 2005, whereby the sole appellant, has been found guilty and convicted for the offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Upon hear...
Matan Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-08-2017
1 Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 393 of 2008 With Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 322 of 2008 (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 15.01.2008 and order of sentence dated 18.01.2008 passed by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner No. XVIIth, Ranchi in Session Trial No. 234 of 2002) Matan Mahto ...........APPELLANT [In Cr. A.(DB) 393/2008] Choto Singh @ Chotnath Singh ........APPELLANT [In Cr. A.(DB) 322/2008] Versus State of Jharkhand .RESPONDENTS (In both appeals) For the Appellants : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate. Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Advocate. For the State : Mr. S.K. Srivastava, A.P.P. P R E S E N T HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ...... C.A.V. On: 02.11.2017 Pronounced on: 08/11/2017 Ananda Sen, J: These two criminal appeals, being Cr. Appeal (DB) Nos. 393 of 2008 and Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 322 o...
Arun Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-08-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 976 of 2015 Arun Kumar Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH For the Petitioners :Mr. B.M. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Naveen Kr. Jaiswal, Advocate For the State :A.P.P. ..... 09/Dated: 08/11/2017 1. The petitionerArun Kumar is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sadar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 19 of 2015, corresponding to G.R. No. 103 of 2015 for the offence under sections 406, 409, 419, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Court.2. This case has been lodged on the basis of written report of one Luis Toppo, District Cooperative Officer, Hazaribagh alleging therein that the petitioner is the owner of Ganpati Rice Plant. It is further alleged that he was directed to purchase paddy by the government from different PACS. As per direction the informant purchased pa...
Shailendra Kumar Gupta Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-08-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1908 of 2015 Shailendra Kumar Gupta Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH For the Petitioners :Mr. B.M. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Naveen Kr. Jaiswal, Advocate For the State :A.P.P. ..... 10/Dated: 08/11/2017 1. The petitionerShailendra Kumar Gupta is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sadar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 21 of 2015, corresponding to G.R. No. 105 of 2015 for the offence under sections 406, 409, 419, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Court.2. This case has been lodged on the basis of written report of one Luis Toppo, District Cooperative Officer, Hazaribagh alleging therein that the petitionerShailendra Kumar Gupta is the director of Aditya Rice Mill Pvt. Ltd, Morangi, Hazaribagh and has embezzled government money i.e Rs. 10,48,84,437.50/.3. The instant case i.e Sadar...
Babu Lal Marik and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-08-2017
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No.364 of 2006 with Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No.245 of 2006 (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 23rd of January, 2006, and Order of sentence dated 25th of January, 2006, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No.-II, Deoghar, in Sessions Case No.107 of 2003.) 1. Babu Lal Marik 2. Mahendra Marik 3. Nakul Marik 4. Joga Marik 5. Bachha Marik . Appellants [in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.364 of 2006] 1. Chhatish Marik 2. Lalu Marrik 3. Bhuma Marrik 4. Gopal Marrik 5. Sibu Marrik 6. Panchu Marrik 7. Jagdish Marrik 8. Sukan Marrik . Appellants [in Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.245 of 2006] -Versus - The State of Jharkhand .. Respondent [in both cases] PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN .. For the Appellants : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Deepankar, Advocate : Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr.Rakesh Kumar, APP. : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey-II, APP. ...
Lato Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 757 of 2017 Lato Devi ..... Petitioner vs. 1. State of Jharkhand. 2. Taso Yadav 3. Baleshwar Yadav 4. Bhuneshwar Yadav ......Opposite parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.B.MANGALMURTI For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Ashok Kumar No. 2, A.P.P For the Opp. Party nos. 2 to 4 : Mr. Binod Kumar Jha, Adv. 13/8.11.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal passed by learned court of Additional Sessions JudgeVIII, Dhanbad in Session Trial No. 50/2002, whereby the accused persons/private opposite parties herein have been acquitted of the charges under Sections 324, 325, 148, 302/149, 307/149 of the Indian Pen...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »