Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajan Kumar Mishra Alias Vikky Mishra and anr Vs. the State of Jharkha ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI B.A. No. 6449 o1. Rajan Kumar Mishra @ Vikky Mishra 2. Abhay Kumar Singh @ Gill Singh ..... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. N. K. Sahani, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ----- 02 /31.08.2013. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are accused in a case instituted under Sections 147, 341.342. 323. 379, 386 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that whatever allegation is there of extortion, it is not against the petitioners, but it is against one Amrendra Pratap Singh and so far other offences are concerned, there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with ...
Basudeo Prajapati Alias Basdeo Prajapati Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI B.A. No. 6461 of 2013 Basudeo Prajapati @ Basdeo Prajapati ..... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : M/s Atanu Banerjee Naresh Pd. Thakur, Advocates. For the State : Mr. Laxmi Murmu, A.P.P. ----- 04 /31.08.2013. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is the case of the prosecution that the Police did receive information that some members of the extremist group, have assembled in a house of Kanchan Mahato @ Doctor and were making plan to commit offence against the Police. On such information, the Police raided that place and succeeded in apprehending three persons, whereas according to the witnesses including the Chawkidar, they saw this petitioner and others fleeing away ...
Ruau Munda and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI B.A. No. 6446 o1. Rusu Munda 2.Bagnu Munda ..... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : Md. A. Khan, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ----- 02 /31.08.2013. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioners are accused in a case instituted under Sections 392 and 397of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that since the informant was robbed of his motorcycle by some unknown miscreants, a case was registered under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, when a motorcycle is said to have been recovered from the house of this petitioner, a case was lodged under Section 414 IPC in which the petitioner was taken into custody. The Police got the petitioner remanded in the case registered under Sections 392, 397 of the Indian Penal Code as it is said that said Mo...
Tarshila Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI B.A. No. 6453 of 2013 Tarshila Devi ..... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opp. Party(s) CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : M/s J.S. Singh, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ----- 02 /31.08.2013. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under Sections 302, 201, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that when Mazeeb Ansari was found murdered, a case was registered against this petitioner and other accused persons as this petitioner is said to have had illicit relation with that deceased, but it does not stand to reason as to why this petitioner would be committing murder of the deceased when it is said that the petitioner was having illicit relation with him and that it has also come during investigation that the one co-accused,namely, Sagar Singh did confess before t...
Bishnu Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.571 of 2013 Bishnu Kumar Gupta ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate Ms. Lina Shakti, Advocate For the State : A. P.P. ----- /30.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 11.6.2013 passed by the learned A.C.J.M., Latehar, in G.R. 538 of 2012, whereby the application for release of the truck bearing registration No. JH-01AQ-8755, seized in connection with the case, has been rejected by the Court below, since the matter had been referred to Dy. Collector, Latehar for initiating a confiscation proceeding, but no report has been received, as to whether the proceeding had been initiated or not.3. It appears that the petitioner has been made accused in Chandwa P.S. Case No.100 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.538 of 2012, for the of...
Chetlal Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 297 of 2012 Chetlal Singh & another ....Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & another Respondents -------- Coram: THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------- For the Petitioners : Mr. N.K. Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : JC to S.C.-III /30.8.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with a view to file a criminal revision. Permission, as sought for, is hereby granted. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Office is directed to return the copies of the documents, which are annexed to this writ petition, to the learned counsel for the petitioners so as to enable him to file a criminal revision after keeping photocopies thereof on record. . (P.P. Bhatt, J.) S.B....
Mithilesh Rai Alias Mithilesh Ray Alias Mithilesh Kumar Vs. the State ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1246 of 2013 Mithilesh Rai @ Mithilesh Ray @ Mithilesh Kumar ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, Advocate For the State : - None. 05/30.08.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Mithilesh Rai @ Mithilesh Ray @ Mithilesh Kumar, is moved by Sri Jitendra S. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and nobody appears on behalf of the State to oppose this application. Petitioner is not named in the first information report. It appears from the impugned order that he has been implicated in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co- accused Dinesh Kumar Shah @ Narad and Rajan Paswan. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow the anticipatory bail application and direct petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 10.09.2013 and in the event of his surrender, the learned cour...
Shashi Ranjan Prasad Vs. the Mineral Area Development Authority Repres ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI CMPNo.202of2013 ShashiRanjanPrasad Petitioner Versus MineralAreaDevelopmentAuthorityandAnr.... Opp.Parties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.N.Singh FortheOpp.Parties :M/sBhaweshKumar,RaviKumarand KumarRahulKamlesh 530.8.2013 Bythismodificationpetition,learnedcounselforthepetitioner submitsthatinadvertentlyintheorderdated9thOctober,2012passed inWP(S)No.5030/2012thenameofrespondentshavebeenrecorded as'StateofJharkhandandothers'whereasitshouldbe'MineralArea DevelopmentAuthorityandanother',whoarerespondentsinthesaid case. He submits that such correction may be made by way of this petition. Learned counsel for the Mineral Area Development Authority alsodoesnotdisputetheaforesaidfact. Inthatviewofthematter,intheorderdated9thOctober,2012, 'theStateofJharkhandandothers'shouldbereadas'MineralArea DevelopmentAuthorityandanother'astherespondents. Let certified copy of this order be issued on submission of requisitebythepetitioner. The...
Madan Gopal Srivastava Vs. the State of Jharkhand Through Chief Secret ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 671 of 2012 Madan Gopal Srivastava .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha For the Respondents : Mr. S.K.Verma 06/31.08.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to file a proper review petition for modification of certain error which according to him are apparent on the face of the record in order dated 6.9.2012 passed in W.P.S. No. 4764 of 2010 for which the instant petition has been filed. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty...
Vijay Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1032 of 2013 Vijay Kumar ... ....Petitioner Vs The State of Jharkhand & Anr....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Sarju Prasad For the State: Mr. P.K. Jaiswal , APP 4/30.08.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Vijay Kumar is moved by Sri Sarju Prasad and opposed by Sri P.K. Jaiswal, learned Additional P.P. At the out set, it is submitted that the parties had entered into a compromise and the alleged money had already been paid to the informant. The aforesaid submissions find supports from Annexure-2. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below by 10.09.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M.,...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »