Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vijay Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Vijay Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 30, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1024547

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vijay Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. no. 1032 of 2013 vijay kumar ... ....petitioner vs the state of jharkhand & anr....opposite parties coram: hon'ble mr. justice prashant kumar for the petitioner: mr. sarju prasad for the state: mr. p.k. jaiswal , app 4/30.08.2013: anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner vijay kumar is moved by sri sarju prasad and opposed by sri p.k. jaiswal, learned additional p.p. at the out set, it is submitted that the parties had entered into a compromise and the alleged money had already been paid to the informant. the aforesaid submissions find supports from annexure-2. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, i allow this application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below by 10.09.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned c.j.m., ranchi in connection with kotwali ( sukhdeo nagar) p.s. case no. 373 of 2011 ( g.r. no. 2106 of 2011) , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. ( prashant kumar,j.) sharda/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1032 of 2013 Vijay Kumar ... ....Petitioner Vs The State of Jharkhand & Anr....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Sarju Prasad For the State: Mr. P.K. Jaiswal , APP 4/30.08.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Vijay Kumar is moved by Sri Sarju Prasad and opposed by Sri P.K. Jaiswal, learned Additional P.P. At the out set, it is submitted that the parties had entered into a compromise and the alleged money had already been paid to the informant. The aforesaid submissions find supports from Annexure-2. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below by 10.09.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Ranchi in connection with Kotwali ( Sukhdeo Nagar) P.S. Case No. 373 of 2011 ( G.R. No. 2106 of 2011) , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial