Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI B.A. No. 6453 of 2013 Tarshila Devi ..... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opp. Party(s) CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : M/s J.
S. Singh, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ----- 02 /31.08.2013. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case instituted under Sections 302, 201, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that when Mazeeb Ansari was found murdered, a case was registered against this petitioner and other accused persons as this petitioner is said to have had illicit relation with that deceased, but it does not stand to reason as to why this petitioner would be committing murder of the deceased when it is said that the petitioner was having illicit relation with him and that it has also come during investigation that the one co-accused,namely, Sagar Singh did confess before the Police that it was this petitioner and other accused persons who committed murder of the deceased but such exculpatory statement will have no evidentiary value so far this petitioner is concerned and thereby, there appears to be absolutely no material showing involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Latehar in connection with Manika P.S. Case No.07 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.56 of 2012 [S.T. No.202 of 2012]. (R. R. Prasad, J.) Sandeep/