Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raj Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.6320of2013 RajKumarSingh. .Petitioner. Versus StateofJharkhand. ....OppositeParties. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioner : Mr.ArvindKumarSingh,Advocate FortheState : A.P.P. 02/31.08.2013: Thepetitionerisanaccusedinthecaseregisteredunder Sections395and397oftheIndianPenalCode. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case; the first information report is lodged against unknown person; nothing incriminating has been recovered from the petitioner's possession; he has been made accused on the basis of the confessional statement of coaccused; said coaccused has been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No.8100 of 2012; the petitionerisincustodysinceMarch,2012buttilldatehehasnot beenputontestidentificationparade;heisalocalpermanent resident;thereisnochanceofhisabsconding. LearnedA.P.P.opposedthepetitioner'sprayerforbail,but hasnotdisputedthesaidcontentions. Regardbeinghadtot...
Basir Sk Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.6748of2013 BasirSk. ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand. ... ... OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.S.K.Verma FortheState :Ms.RichaSanchita,APP 231.8.2013 HeardlearnedcounselforthepetitioneraswellaslearnedAPP appearingonbehalfoftheState. Thisisanapplicationforgrantofregularbailtothepetitioner, who has been accused in connection with Pakur(M) P.S.Case No.137/13,G.R.No.388/13,underSections147,148,149,307,504IPCand 3/4ofExplosiveSubstanceAct. Itissubmittedonbehalfofthepetitionerthatasperstatements made in the fard beyan, there was some quarrel in respect of constructionofPCCroadandtherewereexchangeofabusewithone Jiyaul Sk. The allegation is of hurling of bomb in an omnibus and reckless manner against five accused but it would appear from the impugnedorderitselfthatthemedicalofficerintheinjuryreporthas opinedthattheinjuriesaresimpleinnaturebutcausedbyexplosive substance.Thepetitionerisincustodysince27.6...
Kaleshwar Gope and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.6670of2013 1.KaleshwarGope 2.BhupatiBhusanGowala@Hurka 3.DileshwarMandi@ChandanMandi Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioners :Mr.ChandrajitMukherjee,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/31.08.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Itappearsfromthewrittenreportthatafterreceivinginformationthat members of extremist organization, known as Bhartiya Communist Party (Maowadi),aremovinginthelocalitytocollectlevyfromthecontractorand other people, police raided the place and succeeded to apprehend these petitioners with their associates. On search the petitioners were found in possession of mobile set and M.C.C. literature. One of the coaccusedDilip Murmuwasfoundinpossessionoffirearmloadedwithcartridgeandhewas alsohavingcashofRs.7760/collectedthroughlevy. Itissubmittedthatthepetitionershavebeenfalselyropedinthiscase. Theyhavenoconcernwithanyextremistsorganisation.Nothingincriminating hasbeenr...
Sadhana Jaipuriar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. B.A. No. 6501 of 2013 Sadhana Jaipuriar Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Rajan Raj, Advocate. For the State : - A.P.P. 04/31.08.2013 The present bail application is filed under Sections 439 and 440 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking bail in connection with Manika P.S. Case No. 76 of 2010 dated 09.11.2010 registered under Sections 420, 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code corresponding to G.R. Case No. 616 of 2010 which is now pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Latehar. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP appearing on behalf of the State Perused the F.I.R. and other papers annexed to the application. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P., it appears that the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been submitted. Therefore,...
Koushal Kumar Singh and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 49 o1. Koushal Kumar Singh 2. Dheeraj Kumar Singh ....Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent -------- Coram: THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajan Raj, Advocate For the Respondent : JC to SC-II (IA No. 4790 of 2013) /31.8.2013: Present interlocutory application has been filed seeking amendment in the prayer made in the main petition in order to challenge the cognizance order dated 13.6.2013 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in G.R. No.3766 of 2011. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as respondent-State Government and perused the interlocutory application. For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed. Necessary amendment be carried out in the main petition, accordingly. Accordingly, IA No. 4790 of 2013 stands disposed of. (W.P.(Cr.) No. 49 of 2013) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State Government pointed out that o...
Raj Kishore Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.6299of2013 RajKishoreSingh. .Petitioner. Versus TheStateofJharkhand. ....OppositeParties. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioner : Mr.Gaurav,Advocate FortheState : A.P.P. 02/31.08.2013: Thepetitionerisanaccusedinthecaseregisteredunder Sections302and34oftheIndianPenalCode. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case; there is no specificallegationofanyovertactagainstthepetitioner;entire storyisconcoctedagainstthepetitioner;heisincustodysince January, 2013; he is a local permanent resident; there is no chanceofhisabsconding. LearnedA.P.P.opposedthepetitioner'sprayerforbailand submittedthatthereisdirectallegationagainstthepetitionerin thefirstinformationreport;thepetitionerhasalsoconfessedhis guilt; there areothermaterialevidence against him, including theeyewitness. Regard being had to the nature of allegation and the materials collected in course of investigation agai...
Anil Kumar Mishra Vs. Jharkhand Public Service Commi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 1060 of 2011 Anil Kumar Mishra .... Petitioner Versus Jharkhand Public Service Commission & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Sujit Narayan Prasad For the Respondents : Mr. A. Allam 10/31.08.2013 The affidavit filed yesterday in response to the order dated 29.7.2013 is not satisfactory. The seizure memo vide Annexure-A annexed to the instant affidavit shows that apart from folder of merit list of the examination of other subject one folder of Anthropology running into 5 pages have been seized. According to the petitioner he was not in the merit list as the calculation of the marks based upon the educational qualification has not been properly assessed. His case related to the Anthropology Department. Therefore the query as has been sought by this Court on the last occasion has not been satisfactorily answered. Learned counsel for the J.P.S.C, therefore, seeks s...
Deba Prasad Chakraborty and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P.(C) No.2140 of 2012 ... Deba Prasad Chakraborty & Ors. Petitioners [In W.P. (C) No. 2140 of 2012] -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Others .... Respondents [In W.P. (C) No. 2140 of 2012]. ... For the Petitioners : - M/s. Joydeep Sen, Rajarshi Chatterjee, Dhananjay Banerjee, Piyush Chitresh and Vishal Singh, Advocates. For the Respondents: - M/s. Mahesh Tiwari, S. N. Das and Niranjan Singh, J.C. to S.C. (L&C), Advocates. with M.A No. 35 of 2012 Zila Parishad, Dhanbad & Anr. ... Appellants [In M.A No. 35 of 2012] -V e r s u s- Deba Prasad Chakraborty & Ors. Respondents [In M.A No. 35 of 2012] CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT. For the Appellants : - M/s. Mahesh Tiwari, S. N. Das and Niranjan Singh, Advocates. For the Respondents: - M/s. Joydeep Sen, Rajarshi Chatterjee, Dhananjay Banerjee, Piyush Chitresh and Vishal Singh, Advocates. C.A.V. On : - 14.06.2013 Delivered On : - 31/08/2013 ... 34/31.08.2013 The petitioners by way of a...
Md Mojammil Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 4497 of 2012 Lakshman Ram .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 4314 of 2012 Sanjay Kumar Mehta .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 4340 of 2012 Gyani Yadav .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 4344 of 2012 Raj Kumar Ram .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 4345 of 2012 Imtiyaz Ahmad .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 4349 of 2012 Ram Krishna Pandey .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 4350 of 2012 Md. Mojammil .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P.(S). No. 4353 of 2012 Sanjay Kumar Singh .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents with W.P....
Raghunandan Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.6736of2013 RaghunandanYadav ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand. ... ... OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.J.S.Singh FortheState :Mr.G.S.Prasad,APP 231.8.2013 HeardlearnedcounselforthepetitioneraswellaslearnedAPP appearingonbehalfoftheState. Thisisanapplicationforgrantofregularbailtothepetitioner, whohasbeenaccusedinconnectionwithinconnectionwithHerhanj P.S.Case No.9/13, G.R.No.144/13, under Section under Section 17 of CLAAct. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has been apprehended on the basis of seizure. From the seizure list, it appears that apart from mobile phone certain literatures , which are alleged to be related to Naxal, have been recovered.IntheFIRitisallegedthathehasacceptedthatheispartof extremistgroup.HehasbeenimplicatedunderSection17ofCLAAct under which the maximum punishment is three years and the petitionerisincustodysince10.3.2013. CounselfortheSta...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »