Basir Sk Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Basir Sk vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 31, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1024658

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1024658
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Aug 31, 2013
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Basir Sk

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi b.a.no.6748of2013 basirsk. ... petitioner versus thestateofjharkhand. ... ... oppositeparty coram: honblemr.justiceapareshkumarsingh forthepetitioner :mr.s.k.verma forthestate :ms.richasanchita,app 231.8.2013 heardlearnedcounselforthepetitioneraswellaslearned app appearingonbehalfofthestate. thisisanapplicationforgrantofregularbailtothepetitioner, who has been accused in connection with pakur(m) p.s.case no.137/13,g.r.no.388/13,undersections147,148,149,307,504ipcand 3/4ofexplosivesubstanceact. itissubmittedonbehalfofthepetitionerthatasperstatements made in the fard beyan, there was some quarrel in respect of constructionofpccroadandtherewereexchangeofabusewithone jiyaul sk. the allegation is of hurling of bomb in an omnibus and reckless manner against five accused but it would appear from the impugnedorderitselfthatthemedicalofficerintheinjuryreporthas opinedthattheinjuriesaresimpleinnaturebutcausedbyexplosive substance.thepetitionerisincustodysince27.6.2013. counselforthestateopposestheprayerforbail. inthefactsandcircumstances,letthepetitioner,abovenamed, bereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbond ofrs.10,000/with two suretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionof sdjm,pakurin connectionwithpakur(m)p.s.caseno.137/13,g.r.no.388/13. (apareshkumarsingh,j.) pandey

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.6748of2013 BasirSk. ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand. ... ... OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.S.K.Verma FortheState :Ms.RichaSanchita,APP 231.8.2013 Heardlearnedcounselforthepetitioneraswellaslearned APP appearingonbehalfoftheState. Thisisanapplicationforgrantofregularbailtothepetitioner, who has been accused in connection with Pakur(M) P.S.Case No.137/13,G.R.No.388/13,underSections147,148,149,307,504IPCand 3/4ofExplosiveSubstanceAct. Itissubmittedonbehalfofthepetitionerthatasperstatements made in the fard beyan, there was some quarrel in respect of constructionofPCCroadandtherewereexchangeofabusewithone Jiyaul Sk. The allegation is of hurling of bomb in an omnibus and reckless manner against five accused but it would appear from the impugnedorderitselfthatthemedicalofficerintheinjuryreporthas opinedthattheinjuriesaresimpleinnaturebutcausedbyexplosive substance.Thepetitionerisincustodysince27.6.2013. CounselfortheStateopposestheprayerforbail. Inthefactsandcircumstances,letthepetitioner,abovenamed, bereleasedonbailonfurnishingbailbond ofRs.10,000/with two suretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionof SDJM,Pakurin connectionwithPakur(M)P.S.CaseNo.137/13,G.R.No.388/13. (ApareshKumarSingh,J.) Pandey

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Basir Sk vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Criminal