Raj Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Raj Kumar Singh vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 31, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1024650

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1024650
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Aug 31, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raj Kumar Singh

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi b.a.no.6320of2013 rajkumarsingh. .petitioner. versus stateofjharkhand. ....oppositeparties. coram:honblemr.justicenarendranathtiwari forthepetitioner : mr.arvindkumarsingh,advocate forthestate : a.p.p. 02/31.08.2013: thepetitionerisanaccusedinthecaseregisteredunder sections395and397oftheindianpenalcode. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case; the first information report is lodged against unknown person; nothing incriminating has been recovered from the petitioner's possession; he has been made accused on the basis of the confessional statement of coaccused; said coaccused has been granted bail by this court in b.a. no.8100 of 2012; the petitionerisincustodysincemarch,2012buttilldatehehasnot beenputontestidentificationparade;heisalocalpermanent resident;thereisnochanceofhisabsconding. learneda.p.p.opposedthepetitioner'sprayerforbail,but hasnotdisputedthesaidcontentions. regardbeinghadtothefactsandcircumstancesofthe case,thepetitioner,abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedon bailonfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand) withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount,each,tothesatisfactionof learnedjudicialcommissioner xiii,ranchiinconnectionwiths.t. no.649 of 2012, arising out of lapung p.s. case no.59 of 2011, correspondingtog.r.no.5168of2011. (narendranathtiwari,j.) sanjay/

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.6320of2013 RajKumarSingh. .Petitioner. Versus StateofJharkhand. ....OppositeParties. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioner : Mr.ArvindKumarSingh,Advocate FortheState : A.P.P. 02/31.08.2013: Thepetitionerisanaccusedinthecaseregisteredunder Sections395and397oftheIndianPenalCode. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case; the first information report is lodged against unknown person; nothing incriminating has been recovered from the petitioner's possession; he has been made accused on the basis of the confessional statement of coaccused; said coaccused has been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No.8100 of 2012; the petitionerisincustodysinceMarch,2012buttilldatehehasnot beenputontestidentificationparade;heisalocalpermanent resident;thereisnochanceofhisabsconding. LearnedA.P.P.opposedthepetitioner'sprayerforbail,but hasnotdisputedthesaidcontentions. Regardbeinghadtothefactsandcircumstancesofthe case,thepetitioner,abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedon bailonfurnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand) withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount,each,tothesatisfactionof learnedJudicialCommissioner XIII,RanchiinconnectionwithS.T. No.649 of 2012, arising out of Lapung P.S. Case No.59 of 2011, correspondingtoG.R.no.5168of2011. (NarendraNathTiwari,J.) Sanjay/

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Raj Kumar Singh vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education