Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sri Tejinder Singh
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI C.M.PNo.488of2012 TheCommissionerofIncomeTax,Ranchi Vs. SriTejinderSingh CORAM: HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY FortheAppellant/Petitioner:Mr.D.Roshan FortheRespondents: Dated25 July,2013 th Delaycondoned. T.ANo.12/2007wasdismissedduetononremovalofthedefects andtherefore,itwasdismissedwithoutnoticetotherespondent.However, CivilMiscellaneousPetitionwasfiledforrestorationofT.ANo.12/2007. SinceitwasamatterbetweentheCourtandtheappellantandtheappeal wasnotevenproperlyconstitutedbecauseofseveraldefects,thereisno needtoissuenoticetotherespondent. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on the application for restorationofT.ANo.12/2007. Inviewofthe reasonsstated inthe orderdated12 th September, 2012, passed in C.M.P No.460/2011 (Commissioner of Income Tax, CentralRevenueBuilding,PatnaVs.Md.Sayeed,Ranchi)andinviewof thefactthatinthepresentpetitionalso,thefactsaresimilartothatof C.M.PNo.460/2011,C.M.PNo.488/2012isallowedandT.ANo.12/2007 restore...
Kunjal Ram Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2013 of 2013. ----- Kunjal Ram Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri Jitendra Shankar Singh For the State : Sri Awanikant Prasad, A.P.P. ----- 04/25.07.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Kunjal Ram is moved by Sri Jitendra Shankar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Awanikant Prasad, Addl.P.P. for the State. In the First Information Report only suspicion has been cast against the petitioner on the basis of some information from unknown source. In the case diary also there is no direct allegation against the petitioner and the only allegation against him is confessional statement of co-accused. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 05.08.2013. If petitioner surrenders by that time, the cour...
Sharad Chandra Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 1050 of 2008 Sharad Chandra Gupta ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Anita Kumari Jaiswal .. Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. H.K. Shikarwar, Advocate ------ 18/ 25.07.2013 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance of the order dated 28.6.2013, he has withdrawn the case filed by him under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act against his wife and filed an affidavit to that effect. Learned counsel for the petitioner also produces three Bank drafts of Rs. 3,00,000/- each, drawn upon Lakshmi Vilas Bank, bearing Nos. 818521, 818522 and 818523, all dated 18th July 2013. Let all the three demand drafts be kept in the safe custody of the Registrar General of this Court. Now it is for the opposite party No. 2 to withdraw all the cases filed by her agai...
Ramdhani Sao Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 748 of 2013 Ramdhani Sao .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Prasad For the State: Mr. Priyadarshi, APP 5/25.07.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Ramdhani Sao in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No. 128 of 2012 ( G.R. No. 2356 of 2012) pending in the court of learned J.M. 1st Class, Giridih is moved by Sri Sanjay Prasad and opposed by Sri Priyadarshi, learned Additional P.P. In pursuance of order dated 22.07.2013, the Forester is present in Court. From perusal of FIR, I find that petitioner was arrested by the Forester along with Tractor loaded with stone. It is further alleged that while the petitioner was in custody, some other persons came and get him released illegally by using force. Under the said circumstance, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, hi...
Sizharo Devi Vs. Balmiki Prasad
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(C)No.46of2012 SizharoDevi............................ Petitioner Versus BalmikiPrasad,MD,MADA&Anr Opp.Parties Coram: HonbleMr.JusticeR.R.Prasad ForthePetitioner :Mr.JitendraTripathy,Advocate FortheState :Mr.JCtoSCI ForMADA :Mr.BhaweshKumar,Advocate 8./25.07.2013 AnaffidavithasbeenfiledonbehalfofMADA,whereinstatement hasbeenmadethattheamount,whichthepetitionerisentitledtogeton accountofretiralbenefit,hasbeendeterminedandthepartpaymenthas already been made and only a sum of Rs. 41,626/ has remained to be paid,whichwouldbepaidintwoinstallments. Inviewofthestatement,thisproceedingforcontemptishereby dropped. (R.R.Prasad,J) Mukund/cp2...
Nomita Kisku Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 2327 of 2012 Nomita Kisku ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate For the Respondents : JC to G.P. II --- I.A. No. 4545 o07. 25-07-2013 In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for addition of prayer and amendment in the writ petition. It has been stated that though the petitioner has made statement that three men committee has not recommended the name of the petitioner, the prayer for quashing of that part of the order, affecting her, could not be made in the writ petition. It has been submitted that the amendment is required for the ends of justice and the amendment prayed for is based on the same factual background, which is given in the writ petition. Learned J.C. to G.P.II, appearing on behalf of the respondents, has not disputed the said contention and has not opposed the application. Considering that petiti...
Bimal Kumar Tudu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2021 of 2013. ----- Bimal Kumar Tudu Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri Rajiv Sharma For the State : Sri G.S. Prasad, A.P.P. ----- 05/25.07.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Bimal Kumar Tudu is moved by Sri Rajiv Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri G.S. Prasad, Addl.P.P. for the State. It is alleged that while petitioner was taking 12.50 quintals of rice for selling in black market, same was seized by villagers and kept in Saksharta Bhawan. However, from perusal of case diary, specially at paragraph no.35, I find that no discrepancies and irregularities found in the shop of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 05.08.2013. If petitioner surrenders by that time, the cou...
Sri Balajee Hard Coke and Factory Through Its Partner Rajlal Mahto and ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.525 o1. M/s Shree Balajee Coke and factory through its partner Rajlal Mahto 2. Rajlal Mahto 3. Dilip Kumar Mahto ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioners : Mr. Raj Mangal Singh For the State : A. P.P. ----- 4/25.7.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.2. Petitioners are aggrieved by order dated 9.6.2013 passed by Sri K. K. Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat, in Maahuatand P.S. Case No.7 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.109 of 2012, whereby the application filed by the petitioners for release of 200 tons of raw coal, 200 tons of slurry coal, 30 ton of hard coke, which were seized from the premises of Balajee Hard Coke Factory, has been rejected by the Court below.3. In the raid conducted in Balajee Hard Coke Factory, 200 tons of raw coal, 200 tons of slurry, 30 tons of hard coke, which were foun...
Prem Keshri Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6825 of 2013 Prem Keshri ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/25.7.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 413/414/34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.178 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No.1895 of 2013. The case relates to recovery of illegal coal from the depot of the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Prem Keshri is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Daya Ram, learned Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, or his successor, in connection with Govindpur P.S....
Amit Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.556 of 2013 Amit Kumar ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Lochan For the State : A. P.P. ----- 5/25.7.2013 I.A. No.4409 of 2013 This interlocutory application has been filed for condonation of delay of three days in filing the revision application. In view of the statements made in the interlocutory application, the delay in filing the revision application is hereby condoned. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is allowed. Cr. Revision No.556 of 2013 This application will be heard. Admit. Call for the lower court records. During the pendency of this application, the petitioner Amit Kumar shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella-Kharsawan, in connection with Adityapur P.S. Cas...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »