Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bimal Kumar Tudu Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Bimal Kumar Tudu vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 25, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1007828

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bimal Kumar Tudu

Advocate Sri. Rajiv Sharma

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a.no. 2021 of 2013. ----- bimal kumar tudu petitioner. versus the state of jharkhand opposite party. ..... coram : the hon'ble mr. justice prashant kumar. ----- for the petitioner : sri rajiv sharma for the state : sri g.s. prasad, a.p.p. ----- 05/25.07.2013. anticipatory bail application filed by bimal kumar tudu is moved by sri rajiv sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by sri g.s. prasad, addl.p.p. for the state. it is alleged that while petitioner was taking 12.50 quintals of rice for selling in black market, same was seized by villagers and kept in saksharta bhawan. however, from perusal of case diary, specially at paragraph no.35, i find that no discrepancies and irregularities found in the shop of the petitioner. considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, i allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 05.08.2013. if petitioner surrenders by that time, the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, named above, on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, dumka in connection with masalia(tongra) p.s. case no.09/13, corresponding to g.r.no.170/13, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr. p.c. ( prashant kumar, j.) pramanik/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2021 of 2013. ----- Bimal Kumar Tudu Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri Rajiv Sharma For the State : Sri G.S. Prasad, A.P.P. ----- 05/25.07.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Bimal Kumar Tudu is moved by Sri Rajiv Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri G.S. Prasad, Addl.P.P. for the State. It is alleged that while petitioner was taking 12.50 quintals of rice for selling in black market, same was seized by villagers and kept in Saksharta Bhawan. However, from perusal of case diary, specially at paragraph no.35, I find that no discrepancies and irregularities found in the shop of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 05.08.2013. If petitioner surrenders by that time, the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, named above, on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dumka in connection with Masalia(Tongra) P.S. case no.09/13, corresponding to G.R.No.170/13, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) Pramanik/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial