Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rakesh Ram Chandravanshi Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.762of2013 RakeshRamChandravanshi Petitioner Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand 2.InduDevi OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.SurendraPrasadSinha,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 04/29.07.2013 PetitionerisaccusedinconnectionwithComplaintcaseNo.576of2011, pendingintheCourtofShriShwyambhu,learnedJudicialMagistrate1stClass, PalamauatDaltonganj. TheJudgeinCharge,CivilCourt,PalamauatDaltonganjisdirectedto giveexplanationastowhytheservicereportinrespectofnoticeissuedtoO.P. No.2hasnotyetbeencommunicatedtothisCourt.Theexplanationmustreach thisCourtby06.08.2013. Listthiscaseundertheheading'foradmission'on08.08.2013. Theinterimorderdated03.04.2013shallcontinuetillthenextlisting. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC...
Ramrai Ugar Sundi Alias Dambu Alias Rama Ugru Sundi Vs. State of Jhark ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 421 of 2013 Ramrai Ugar Sundi @ Dambu @ Rama Ugru Sundi Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent --------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR --------- For the Appellant : Mr. Krishna Shankar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. --------- 04/Dated:29. h July, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J.:1. This criminal appeal is Admitted.2. Records and proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 26 of 2005 is called for from the concerned Trial Court (learned Sessions Judge, Seraikella- Kharsawan), so as to reach to this Court to appreciate the argument for suspension of sentence.3. Registry of this Court is directed to get the paper books prepared with neatly typed copies of depositions of the witnesses and other documents, as required under Rules 190 and 191 of the Jharkhand High Court Rules, 2001.4. The matter is adjourned to be listed on 26th August, 2013. (D.N. Patel, J.) (Shree Chandrashekhar, J.) Tan...
Naresh Kumar Agarwal Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI CivilReviewNo.42of2011 NareshKumarAgarwal ....Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhandandors. ....Opp.Parties CORAM:HONBLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL .... ForthePetitioner :M/sSumeetGadodia&AjitKumar,Advs. FortheOpp.parties :Mr.S.Choudhary,Govt.Advocate Orderno.4 Dated29th July,2013 1. Sincethismatterrequiresconsideration,thisReviewpetition isadmittedforhearing.2. Listfor'Hearing'. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (D.N.Patel,J) G.Jha/...
Jaduram Murmu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 2252 of 2013 Jaduram Murmu ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ananda Sen, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 6/ 29.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 302 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Dhalbhumgarh P.S. Case No. 24 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 207 of 2011, S.T. No. 152 of 2012. The case relates to murder of the daughter of the informant and from the FIR, it appears that prior to her death, the victim was with this petitioner, whose dead body was found hanging in a forest. Subsequently, on the basis of the confessional statement of the petitioner, driving license of the petitioner and one photograph of the victim lady were also found and the bail applications of this petitioner...
Maud Alam and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 1811 o1. Maud Alam 2. Husna Ara @ Husna Khatoon ... ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand and another ... Opp. Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : None For the State : Mrs. Niki Sinha, A.P.P. ........ 7/29.07.2013 Nobody appeared on behalf of petitioners. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit...
Mahtab Alam Vs. District Administration
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI. W.P(C) No.6090 of 2012 Mahtab Alam and Ors . ....................... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand &Ors. .................. Respondents CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioners :- Mr V.Shivnath Sr..Adv. Mr. A.Aditya Adv. For the Respondents :- Mr.Srijit Chowdhury.. 5/29.7.2013. The petitioners by way of filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have prayed for issuance of appropriate writ/order directing the respondents authorities to consider the representation filed by the petitioners ( Annexure-3) dated 30th January, 2012 addressed to the Additional Collector, Ramgarh. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the respondents. Perused the materials placed on record. It appears that the present petitioners filed a representation addressed to the Additional Collector,Ramgarh dated 30.1.2012(Annexure-3) as well as the Anchal Adhikari Ramagarh dated 11.8.2011(Annexure-2) i...
Madanmohan Barik and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1263 o1. Madanmohan Barik 2. Manmohan Khillar Petitioners -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Another ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioners : - Mr. Shailesh, Advocate. For the State : - Mr. Hardeo Pd. Singh, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : - Mr. N.K. Pasari, Advocate. 06/29.07.2013 Put up this case in the next week, as prayed by learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. In the meantime, interim order passed on 22.07.2013 will continue. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/...
Kanti Devi and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 1584 o1. Kanti Devi 2. Prem Prakash ... ... ... Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Sneh Prabha Kumari ... ... Opp. Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the State : Mrs. Niki Sinha, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.-2 Mr. Indrajit Sinha ........ 5/29.07.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Kanti Devi and Prem Prakash is moved by Sri R.S. Mazudmar, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Mrs. Niki Sinha, learned Additional PP. for the State and Sri Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. It is alleged that petitioners were demanding Rs. 5,00,000/- as a dowry for the marriage of informant. It is further alleged that informant's father entered into an agreement with Dinkar Dixit for the sale of land and took Rs. 5,00,000/-, which was deposited in the account of petitioner No.2. Petitioners filed...
Central Coalfields Limited Vs. their Workman Sri Rajendra Dub
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (L) No. 2254 of 2011 --- Central Coalfields Limited --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus Their Workman Sri Rajendra Dubey --- --- --- Respondent --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Bhaiya Vishwajeet Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Sarju Prasad, Advocate --- I.A. No. 4771 /2013 --- 10/ 29.07.2013 The instant interlocutory application has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner Management for stay of the impugned Award wherein the respondent workman was directed to be reinstated in service with full back wages and consequential benefits. During the pendency of the writ application, by virtue of an interim order dated 29th August 2012, the workman has been getting full back wages along with current wages under the provisions of section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act. According to the counsel for the respondent workman, the workman has already reached the age of superannuation. In such circums...
Joshna Karmakar Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cont. Case [Civil] No. 322 of 2011 Joshna Karmakar ..... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. . Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. P. K. Mukhopadhyay, Advocate. For the State : J.C. to S.C.II For the DMC : Mr. Raunak Sahay, Advocate ----- 11 /27.06.2013. When death-cum-pensionary benefits were not paid to the petitioner, the petitioner filed a Writ Petition before this Court, which was disposed of, on 08.12.2010, directing the respondents to take a decision in the matter. When no decision was taken, the contempt petition was filed. Now a Supplementary show-cause has been filed wherein a copy of the order passed on 15.05.2013 has been annexed. By the said order, claim of the petitioner has been rejected for the reason that the matter relating to date of birth and educational qualification has still neither been verified nor Service book has been certified. Both objections seem to have been...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »