Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kanti Devi and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Kanti Devi and anr vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 29, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008159

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kanti Devi and anr

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

.....additional pp. for the state and sri indrajit sinha, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. it is alleged that petitioners were demanding rs. 5,00,000/- as a dowry for the marriage of informant. it is further alleged that informant's father entered into an agreement with dinkar dixit for the sale of land and took rs. 5,00,000/-, which was deposited in the account of petitioner no.2. petitioners filed bank statements of account of petitioner no. 2 to show that aforesaid money deposited in the account of petitioner no.2 by dinkar dixit. a counter-affidavit filed wherein informant stated that he instructed dinkar dixit to deposit rs. 5,00,000/- in the account of petitioner no.2. thus, i find contradiction in the statements of informant made in f.i.r. and counter-affidavit. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, i allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioners to surrender in the court below on or before 12 of august 2013 and in the event of their surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge them on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of sri s.m. sikdar, judicial magistrate, ranchi in connection with tatisilway p.s. case no. 12 of 2013 corresponding to g.r. no. 779 of 2013, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr. p.c. (prashant kumar, j.) binit

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 1584 o”

1. Kanti Devi 2. Prem Prakash ... ... ... Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Sneh Prabha Kumari ... ... Opp. Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the State : Mrs. Niki Sinha, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.-2 Mr. Indrajit Sinha ........ 5/29.07.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Kanti Devi and Prem Prakash is moved by Sri R.S. Mazudmar, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Mrs. Niki Sinha, learned Additional PP. for the State and Sri Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite party No.

2. It is alleged that petitioners were demanding Rs. 5,00,000/- as a dowry for the marriage of informant. It is further alleged that informant's father entered into an agreement with Dinkar Dixit for the sale of land and took Rs. 5,00,000/-, which was deposited in the account of petitioner No.

2. Petitioners filed Bank statements of account of petitioner No. 2 to show that aforesaid money deposited in the account of petitioner No.2 by Dinkar Dixit. A counter-affidavit filed wherein informant stated that he instructed Dinkar Dixit to deposit Rs. 5,00,000/- in the account of petitioner No.

2. Thus, I find contradiction in the statements of informant made in F.I.R. and counter-affidavit. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioners to surrender in the court below on or before 12 of August 2013 and in the event of their surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge them on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.M. Sikdar, Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in connection with Tatisilway P.S. Case No. 12 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 779 of 2013, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial