Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bar Association, Jharkhand Hig Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No. 2347 of 2012 Bar Association, Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ... Respondents ------- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner : Dr. S.N.Pathak, Sr. Advocate. For the Respondent University : Mr. S.Srivastava, Advocate For the Respondent State : J.C. to A.A.G. ------ Order No. 19 Dated 29th July, 2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. This is a matter relating to the establishment of National Law University namely National University of Study and Research in Law. The Chief Minister himself was party in foundation stone laying ceremony in the month of April, 2011 and possession of land has been handed over by the State Government to the National Law University. The construction started, several objections were effectively met with the State and thereafter, repeatedly various assurances were given that the National University o...
Naresh Tudu Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. (Jail) Appeal (DB) No. 477 of 2013 Naresh Tudu Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- 02/Dated: July, 29, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J1) This appeal is ADMITTED.2) As the instant appeal is a Jail Appeal, we hereby appoint Ms. Alpana Verma, Advocate, who is on the panel of Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority, as an Amicus Curiae to assist the Court on behalf of the appellant.3) Records and proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 102 of 2011 is called for from the trial Court (Additional Sessions Judge-II, Deoghar) so as to reach this Court to appreciate the argument for suspension of sentence on or before the next date of hearing.4) Matter is adjourned to be enlisted 26th August, 2013 for argument on the point of suspension of sentence.5) Registry is directed to supply the papers of this Criminal Appeal along with judgment of the trial C...
Bittu Alias Ishaque Khan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.3478of2013 Bittu@IshaqueKhan Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.VishalKumarTiwary,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 04/29.07.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ThepetitionerisaccusedinconnectionwithTatisilwayP.S.CaseNo.82of 2012correspondingtoG.R.CaseNo.6879of2012,pendingintheCourtofSri S.N.Sikadar,learnedJ.M.1stClass,Ranchi. It reveals from the F.I.R. that the miscreants, riding on motorcycle, snatchedawaybagcontainingRs,1,11,000/frompossessionoftheinformant. In course of investigation some of the accused were apprehended and they confessedtheirguilt. Thepetitionerhasalsoconfessedhisguiltandonthe basisofconfessionlootedbag,cashanddocumentsrelatedtoS.K.S.Company havebeenrecoveredfromhisroom.Thelootedbagwasalsoidentifiedbythe witnessinT.I.Parade. It is submitted that other coaccused having more or less similar allegationhasbeengrantedbailbyanotherBenchofthisCourt.Petitioner...
K D Paswan Alias Krishna Paswan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1986 o1. K.D.Paswan @ Krishna Paswan 2. Musfir Paswan 3. Sanju Devi 4. Mukesh Paswan ..............................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another...... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr. Vaibhav Kumar For the State :A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 : Mr.Shailsh 5/ 29.7.13. As prayed for on behalf of opposite party no.2, let this matter be listed on 12.8.2013 so that counter affidavit be filed. Till then, interim order passed on 18.7.2013 shall continue. (R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Mukesh Kumar Mangeskar Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 4122 of 2012 Mukesh Kumar Mangeskar .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Thakur For the State: Mr. S.K. Dubey, APP For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. S.K. Dwivedi 8/29.07.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Mukesh Kumar Mangeskar in connection with Sector IV P.S. Case No. 116 of 2011 ( G.R. No. 975 of 2011) pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bokaro is moved by Sri Sanjeev Thakur and opposed by Sri S.K. Dubey, learned Additional P.P. and Sri S.K. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2. It is admitted by the petitioner that he received Rs. 16,000,00/- from the informant's company. However , it is stated that the said money paid to Md. Sahid and Manoj Kumar Sharma as per the direction of Sibu Da, brother of informant. In the counter affidavit, the Memorandum of Association of the in...
Mod Narayan Singh Vs. Rural Works Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 3615 of 2013 Mod Narayan Singh ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ..Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate : Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A Allam, Sr. S.C. II ---- 03/29-7-2013 Learned Sr. S.C. II submitted that the counter affidavit is in process and is likely to be filed in a couple of days. He has also informed that decision has been taken by the respondents to pay salary and within a day or two, appropriate order shall be issued for payment of the petitioner's salary. As prayed for, put up this case on 12th August, 2013. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Ajit Kumar and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1446 o1. Ajit Kumar 2. Hari Sahu @ Hari Prasad Sahu 3. Snehlata Devi 4. Ajay Sahu @ Ajay Kumar 5. Sanjita Devi @ Sanjeeta Sahu 6. Amit Sahu @ amit Kumar 7. Ruma Devi @ Ruma Gupta.............................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another...... .........Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K.Das For the State :A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 :3. 29.7.13. As prayed for on behalf of opposite party no.2, let this matter be listed on 19.8.2013 so that counter affidavit be filed. Till then, interim order passed on 24.6.2013 shall continue. (R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Satyendra Kumar Sao Alias Satyendra Kumar Alias Satyendra Sao Vs. the ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.974of2013 SatyendraKumarSao@SatyendraKumar@SatyendraSao Petitioner Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand 2.RaniDevi OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.OmPrakashTiwari,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 04/29.07.2013 PetitionerisaccusedinconnectionwithComplaintcaseNo.119of2011, pending in the Court of A.K. Guria, learned Judicial Magistrate 1 st Class, PalamauatDaltonganj. TheJudgeinCharge,CivilCourt,PalamauatDaltonganjisdirectedto giveexplanationastowhytheservicereportinrespectofnoticeissuedtoO.P. No.2hasnotyetbeencommunicatedtothisCourt.Theexplanationmustreach thisCourtby06.08.2013. Listthiscaseundertheheading'foradmission'on08.08.2013. Theinterimorderdated11.04.2013shallcontinuetillthenextlisting. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC...
Birendra Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 4399 of 2013 ------- Birendra Singh . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Indrajit Sinha For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 4/ 29.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 314 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 6001 of 2012, for the offence under Sections 406, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. From the F.I.R. it appears that a consignment was sent on a truck which never reached its destination. The petitioner has been made accused in this case being the owner of the truck and the impugned order shows that the empty truck was recovered from the house of the petitioner. Admittedly, the petitioner is the owner of the truck and thereafter there is only the confessional statement of the petitioner. In the f...
Madan Sahu and ors Vs. Smt Shanti Devi and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3753 of 2013 Madan Sahu & Ors. .... .. Petitioners Versus Smt. Shanti Devi & Ors. ...... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioners : Mr. Ayush Aditya, Adv. For the Respondents : - -- 3/29.07.2013 Petitioners by way of filing the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, have prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 09.05.2013 passed by learned Additional Judicial Commissioner -VII, Ranchi in Title Appeal No.98 of 2007, whereby the petition dated 7.02.2013, filed under Order I Rule10 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure has been rejected. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and on perusal of materials placed on record, issue urgent show cause notice to respondents by registered post with A/D as well as ordinary process, for which requisites etc. must be filed within one week. The notice is made returnable on 26.08.2013. Till t...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »