Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mukesh Kumar Mangeskar Vs. State of Jharkhand

Mukesh Kumar Mangeskar vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 29, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008142

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mukesh Kumar Mangeskar

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a. b.a. no. 4122 of 2012 mukesh kumar mangeskar .........petitioner vs. the state of jharkhand & anr ........opposite parties coram: hon'ble mr. justice prashant kumar for the petitioner: mr. sanjeev thakur for the state: mr. s.k. dubey, app for the o.p. no. 2: mr. s.k. dwivedi 8/29.07.2013: anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner mukesh kumar mangeskar in connection with sector iv p.s. case no. 116 of 2011 ( g.r. no. 975 of 2011) pending in the court of learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, bokaro is moved by sri sanjeev thakur and opposed by sri s.k. dubey, learned additional p.p. and sri s.k. dwivedi, learned counsel for the o.p. no.2. it is admitted by the petitioner that he received rs. 16,000,00/- from the informant's company. however , it is stated that the said money paid to md. sahid and manoj kumar sharma as per the direction of sibu da, brother of informant. in the counter affidavit, the memorandum of association of the informant's company has been annexed. from perusal of the same, it appears that sibu da is not the director of the said company and it appears that he has no concern with the said company. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, i am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. accordingly, his anticipatory bail application rejected. ( prashant kumar,j.) sharda/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 4122 of 2012 Mukesh Kumar Mangeskar .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Thakur For the State: Mr. S.K. Dubey, APP For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. S.K. Dwivedi 8/29.07.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Mukesh Kumar Mangeskar in connection with Sector IV P.S. Case No. 116 of 2011 ( G.R. No. 975 of 2011) pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bokaro is moved by Sri Sanjeev Thakur and opposed by Sri S.K. Dubey, learned Additional P.P. and Sri S.K. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the O.P. No.

2. It is admitted by the petitioner that he received Rs. 16,000,00/- from the informant's company. However , it is stated that the said money paid to Md. Sahid and Manoj Kumar Sharma as per the direction of Sibu Da, brother of informant. In the counter affidavit, the Memorandum of Association of the informant's company has been annexed. From perusal of the same, it appears that Sibu Da is not the Director of the said company and it appears that he has no concern with the said company. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his anticipatory bail application rejected. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial