Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Pushpendra Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2568 of 2013 Pushpendra Kumar Singh ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Choubey For the State : Mr. S.K. Dubey, A.P.P. ........ 4/31.07.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Pushpendra Kumar Singh is moved by Sri Manoj Kumar Choubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri S.K. Dubey, learned Additional PP. for the State. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to return Rs. 47,000/-(Rs. Forty seven thousand) to the complainant. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below on 14th of August 2013. On that day, petitioner filed a bank draft of Rs. 47,000/- in the name of complainant. If aforesaid bank draft is filed, the learned court below is dir...
Tag this Judgment!State of Jharkhand and ors Vs. Binod Kumar Rana
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI L.P.A.No.340of2012 With I.A.No.2671of2012 TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. .... .... .... Appellants Versus BinodKumarRana .... .... ....Respondent CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY FortheAppellants :Mr.PrashantKumarSahu,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mr. st OrderNo.08 Dated,31 July,2013 Heardlearnedcounselforthepartiesontheapplication forcondonationofdelaybeingI.A.No.2671of2012. Thereisadelayof33daysinfilingtheL.P.A.whichis beingopposedbythelearnedcounselfortherespondent. However, looking to the reasons stated in the application,wedeemitpropertocondonethedelayandtheI.A. No.2671of2012isallowedaccordingly. ListthiscaseforAdmissionaftertwoweeks. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (JayaRoy,J.) SI/Anit...
Tag this Judgment!Rajendra Ram Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1645 of 2011 Rajendra Ram .............................. .......Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ....Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar For the State :A.P.P 6.31.7.13. As prayed for on behalf of the State, let this matter be listed after three weeks so that in the meantime, counter affidavit be filed. Till then, the charge shall not be framed. ( R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Tag this Judgment!Chandra Bhushan Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1136 of 2013 Chandra Bhushan Yadav @ Bhushan Yadav.........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi For the State: Mr. Shekhar Sinha ,APP 7/31.07.2013: Bail application filed by petitioner Chandra Bhushan Yadav @ Bhushan Yadav is moved by Sri A.K. Chaturvedi and opposed by Sri Shekhar Sinha, learned Additional P.P. Earlier bail prayer of petitioner rejected. However, liberty given to him for renewing his prayer for bail after six months if trial is not concluded by that time. It appears from the status report at Flag-R that though the charge is framed against petitioner but up till now, no witness examined on behalf of prosecution. Petitioner is in custody from 02.01.2012. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the court below to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing ba...
Tag this Judgment!Md Azad Khan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. A.B.A.No. 2667 of 2013 ----- Md. Azad Khan Petitioner. Versus State of Jharkhand Opp.party ...... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri Shailesh Kr. Sinha For the State : Sri T.N. Verma, A.P.P. ----- 02/31.07.2013. Anticipatory bail petition filed by Md. Azad Khan in connection with Jai Nagar P.S. case no.56 of 2013 pending in the court of learned chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma, is moved by Sri Shailesh Kr. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri T.N. Verma, A.P.P. for the State. There is direct allegation against the petitioner that he committed rape upon the informant. Under the said circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Pramanik/...
Tag this Judgment!Narendera Pal Singh and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1576 o1. Narendera Pal Singh 2.Surendera Kaur 3.Inder Pal Singh..................................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another . Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr.A.K.Das For the State : A.P.P 5.31.7.13. The order dated 3.8.2011 passed in C-1 case no.1737 of 2011 whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offence punishable under Sections 498A. 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioners is being sought to be quashed on the ground that the parties have settled their matrimonial dispute and have arrived at to a compromise. It appears that a case was lodged by the opposite party no.2 alleging therein that she was subjected to torture on account of non- fulfillment of demand of dowry. The said case was registered as C-1 case no.1737 of 2011 in which cognizance of the offence was taken on 3.8.2011. It further appears that the petitioner no.1 had filed a suit for div...
Tag this Judgment!Kameshwar Prasad Singh Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.4042 of 2012 Kameshwar Prasad Singh .......... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ........ Respondents ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the petitioner :Mr. A.K. Das Mr. Arbind Kumar For the State : Mr. Ratnakar Bhengra For the Ranchi University: Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta. ------ I.A. No.5112 o3. 31.07.2013: In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) No.4042/2012 in terms of order dated 2.7.2013 passed in W.P.(S) No.4052/2012 (Doodh Nath Tiwary vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.) It has been submitted that the facts and points involved in this matter are exactly identical to the said case of Doodh Nath Tiwary (supra) and this case may be disposed of in terms of the said order. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has supported the said contention of learned counsel for the petitioner. Considering the above, this I.A. is allowed. The writ petition is being dis...
Tag this Judgment!Vinay Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2140 of 2013 Vinay Kumar Singh .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the State: Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma,APP 4/31.07.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Vinay Kumar Singh is moved by Sri Indrajit Sinha and opposed by Sri Shiv Kumar Sharma, learned Additional P.P. Petitioner is Weighment Bridge Clerk of Berra Collier. It is alleged that on 03.06.2012, a Truck bearing Registration No. WB 25.4925 of Ojha Coal Trader entered in the Coliery area on the basis of D.O. No. 1300431250 for loading coal. It is further alleged that the said truck returned with 1.05 MT excess coal. It is further alleged that the petitioner allowed the said truck to go out by showing that it was empty. It is submitted that the Weigh Bridge situates in between the Check Post of CISF and Colliery. Under the said circumstance, if truck...
Tag this Judgment!Juliana Kumari Tirkey Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.2509 of 2013 with I.A. no.5183 of 2013 Julianan Kumari Tirkey . Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhananjay Kr.Dubey, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to Sr.S.C.I ----- 2/31.07.2013 In I.A. no.5183 of 2013, the petitioner has prayed for fixing an early date of hearing and disposal of W.P.(S) no.2509 of 2013 on the ground that she is a Tribal and retired lady. In the writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order, contained in Annexure-12, whereby the petitioner's pay was reduced from Rs.2600/- to 2525/-. It has been submitted that during pendency of the petition, the petitioner has retired and has filed representation for payment of her retiral dues. She does not want to press the prayer made in the writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition be disposed of directing the respo...
Tag this Judgment!Saiyad Barkat Ullah Vs. Police
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No. 3841 of 2012 Saiyad Barkat Ullah ...... Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner: Mr. Binod Singh For the Respondent: J.C to A.G Order No. 06 ------ Dated 31st July, 2013 Learned counsel for the State has submitted report in sealed cover relating to the investigation made by the Crime Investigation Department of State of Jharkhand pertaining to Kuru P.S. Case No. 41 and 44 of 2012 both dated 18th May, 2012. The petitioner's allegation is that the victim Ser Mohammad @ Sheru Ansari was killed when he was in police custody on 18th May, 2012. However, as per the First Information Report of Kuru P.S. Case No. 41 of 2012, the Officer-in-Charge of the concerned police station himself recorded statement that hundreds of unknown persons assaulted the deceased while he was trying to flee away from the police. Whereas father of the...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »