Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vinay Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Vinay Kumar Singh vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 31, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008779

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vinay Kumar Singh

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

.....that the said truck returned with 1.05 mt excess coal. it is further alleged that the petitioner allowed the said truck to go out by showing that it was empty. it is submitted that the weigh bridge situates in between the check post of cisf and colliery. under the said circumstance, if truck goes out, it is the duty of the cisf officer to check all the documents relating to the said truck. thus, if the said truck has gone out with 1.05 mt excess coal, then it could have been stopped by cisf officers, but they have not done so which shows that the said truck went out of check post without any coal. it is further submitted that another co- accused, namely, rana pratap singh, loading clerk, has been granted regular bail by a bench of this court vide order dated 15.05.2013 in b.a. no. 4487 of 2013. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, i allow this application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below by 14.08.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, dhanbad in connection with dhanbad ( dhansar) p.s. case no. 622 of 2012 ( g.r. no. 2457 of 2012) , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. ( prashant kumar,j.) sharda/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2140 of 2013 Vinay Kumar Singh .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the State: Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma,APP 4/31.07.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Vinay Kumar Singh is moved by Sri Indrajit Sinha and opposed by Sri Shiv Kumar Sharma, learned Additional P.P. Petitioner is Weighment Bridge Clerk of Berra Collier. It is alleged that on 03.06.2012, a Truck bearing Registration No. WB 25.4925 of Ojha Coal Trader entered in the Coliery area on the basis of D.O. No. 1300431250 for loading coal. It is further alleged that the said truck returned with 1.05 MT excess coal. It is further alleged that the petitioner allowed the said truck to go out by showing that it was empty. It is submitted that the Weigh Bridge situates in between the Check Post of CISF and Colliery. Under the said circumstance, if truck goes out, it is the duty of the CISF Officer to check all the documents relating to the said truck. Thus, if the said truck has gone out with 1.05 MT excess coal, then it could have been stopped by CISF Officers, but they have not done so which shows that the said truck went out of check post without any coal. It is further submitted that another co- accused, namely, Rana Pratap Singh, Loading Clerk, has been granted regular bail by a bench of this Court vide order dated 15.05.2013 in B.A. No. 4487 of 2013. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below by 14.08.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Dhanbad ( Dhansar) P.S. Case No. 622 of 2012 ( G.R. No. 2457 of 2012) , subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial