Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pushpendra Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Pushpendra Kumar Singh vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 31, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008723

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pushpendra Kumar Singh

Advocate Sri. Manoj Kumar Choubey

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand ranchi a. b. a. no. 2568 of 2013 pushpendra kumar singh ... ... ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand ... ... opp. party coram: honble mr. justice prashant kumar ............ for the petitioner : mr. manoj kumar choubey for the state : mr. s.k. dubey, a.p.p. ........ 4/31.07.2013 anticipatory bail application filed by pushpendra kumar singh is moved by sri manoj kumar choubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by sri s.k. dubey, learned additional pp. for the state. at the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to return rs. 47,000/-(rs. forty seven thousand) to the complainant. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, i allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below on 14th of august 2013. on that day, petitioner filed a bank draft of rs. 47,000/- in the name of complainant. if aforesaid bank draft is filed, the learned court below is directed to enlarge petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, dumka, in connection with p.c.r. case no. 98 of 2012, corresponding to t.r. no. 1232 of 2013, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr. p.c. the learned court below is directed to hand over the said bank draft to the complainant on proper identification subject to the condition that complainant file application for withdrawal of complaint petition. (prashant kumar, j.) binit

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2568 of 2013 Pushpendra Kumar Singh ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Choubey For the State : Mr. S.K. Dubey, A.P.P. ........ 4/31.07.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Pushpendra Kumar Singh is moved by Sri Manoj Kumar Choubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri S.K. Dubey, learned Additional PP. for the State. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready to return Rs. 47,000/-(Rs. Forty seven thousand) to the complainant. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below on 14th of August 2013. On that day, petitioner filed a bank draft of Rs. 47,000/- in the name of complainant. If aforesaid bank draft is filed, the learned court below is directed to enlarge petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dumka, in connection with P.C.R. Case No. 98 of 2012, corresponding to T.R. No. 1232 of 2013, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. The learned court below is directed to hand over the said bank draft to the complainant on proper identification subject to the condition that complainant file application for withdrawal of complaint petition. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial