Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhuneshwar Mehta Alias Bhuneshwar Mahto and ors Vs. the State of Jhark ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2215 o1. Bhuneshwar Mehta @ Bhuneshwar Mahto 2. Narayan @ Manoj Mahto 3. Tarkeshwar Singh 4. Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Mahto 5. Basant Mehta .. ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : Mr. Nilesh Kumar For the State : Mr. T.N. Verma, A.P.P. ........ 2/20.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Bhuneshwar Mehta @ Bhuneshwar Mahto, Narayan @ Manoj Mahto, Tarkeshwar Singh, Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Mahto and Basant Mehta is moved by Sri Nilesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri T.N. Verma, learned Additional PP. for the State. It appears that co-accused Sanjay Verma @ Sanjay Kumar Verma, Parmeshwar Singh, Satyendra Agrawal and Surendra Singh have been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.05.2013 in A.B.A. No. 1214 of 2013. Case of petitioners stand on similar footin...
Bhola Ansari Alias Sanaulla Ansari and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A.No. 3712 of 2013 With B.A No.3893 of 2013 Chhunki Ansari ... Petitioner(B.A No.3712/13) 1. Bhola @ Sanaullah Ansari 2. Ataul @ Attaullah Ansari ....... Petitioners(B.A No.3893/13) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr.J.S.Singh, Advocate. Mr.A.K.Singh, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 17.06.2013 Both these applications arise out of the same case, as such, they are being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Kuru P.S. Case No. 81 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 395 of 2012 for the offence under Sections 302/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to murder of the husband of the informant, who came to house and informed the informant that six persons including these petitioners had assaulted him. Sub...
Jasbir Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3706 of 2013 Jasbir Singh ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.D.K.Chakraverty, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 17.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sidhgora P.S. Case No. 01 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 07 of 2013 for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 386, 120-B/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. From the FIR, which was lodged on the basis of the self statement of a Police Officer, it appears that one co-accused was apprehended by the police, from whom, certain mobile phones and cash were recovered and he confessed to be involved in extortion of levy on behalf of the petitioner and the co-accused who were in jail. It is apparent from the FIR itself that the petitioner was in jail custody and ...
Jai Prakash Mandal Vs. Home Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P(PIL)No.1652of2013. JaiPrakashMandal .... .... .... Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhand&Ors. .... .... ....Respondents CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.SudarshanSrivastava,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mr.AjitKumar,A.A.G. th OrderNo.04 Dated,20 June,2013 Heardthecounselfortheparties. Ithasbeenallegedbythepetitionerthatheisamemberof thepoliticalpartyandraisingthecauseofthepublic.Hecameto knowthatoneworkhasbeenawardedofthecontractorevenprior tothefloatingofthetenderinvitingtheofferfromtheprospective bidders. Accordingtothelearnedcounselforthepetitioner,itis apparent from the notice inviting tender in the name of e procurementnotice,Annexure1thatthenoticewaspublishedin thenewspaperof1.3.2013andthelastdateforsubmissionsofthe offerwasonly4.3.2013,therefore,therewasonlythreedaysgiven to the bidders. The newspaper cutting clearly indicates that the workwasstartedevenpriortothepublicationofthesaidtender notice.Itissu...
Sahjada Akram Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2305of2013 SahjadaAkram Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Md.Hatim,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/20.06.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. It reveals from the written report that the dumpher belonging to the petitionerwasfoundcarryinglimestonewithoutvaliddocument. Itissubmittedthatthelimestonewasbeingtransportedonthevehicle onthebasisofvalidtransitpermitanditwasbookedforSuryaCementUdyog, Sandi,Ramgarh.Thechallanwasverifiedbythedepartmentconcernedandit wasfoundtobegenuine. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Sincethechallanproducedbythepetitionerhasbeenconsideredtobe genuinebythedepartmentconcerned,petitionerisdirectedtosurrenderbefore the Court below within a period of three weeks from today and on such surrender he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/(RupeesTenThousand)withtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteachto th...
Shama Praveen Alias Syamma Praveen and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3748 o1. Shama Praveen @ Samma Praveen 2. Shabana Praveen @ Sahin Praveen @ Shahin Praveen @ Sabana Praveen ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 17.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Barhi P.S. Case No. 297 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 4619 of 2012, S.T No.168 of 2013 for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to murder of the brother of the informant who was found dead in his house on his bed. The petitioner No.1, Shama Praveen @ Samma Praveen is the wife of the deceased and the petitioner No.2, Shabana Praveen @ Sahin Praveen @ Shahin Praveen @ Sabana Praveen is the sister-in-law of the deceased and they were also present...
Ajay Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2175 of 2013 Ajay Singh .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. P.K. Mukhopadhyay For the State: Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, APP 2/20.06.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Ajay Singh is moved by Sri P.K. Mukhopadhyay and opposed by Sri Vijay Kumar Gupta, learned Additional P.P. This is a case under section 498 A of the IPC. Petitioner is husband. It appears that the present complaint case filed on 22.12.2009. It is submitted that on that date , it self, matrimonial suit bearing Matrimonial Suit No. 573 of 2009 was filed by the complainant ( Rani Singh) for divorce. The said Matrimonial Suit allowed vide order dated 25.2.2011,as contained in Annexure-3 to this application . It it appears that at present, the marriage between the petitioner and complainant has already been dissolved. Considering the aforesaid facts an...
Matlu Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2203 of 2013. ----- Matlu Yadav @ Mallu Yadav Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. P.S.Dayal For the State : Sri.S.K.Pandey, A.P.P. ----- 02/20.06.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Matlu Yadav @ Mallu Yadav is moved by Sri. P.S.Dayal , learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri. S.K.Pandey , Addl P.P. for the State. It appears that co-accused Pramod Saw has been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.04.2013 in ABA No. 941/2013. The case of petitioner stands of similar footing. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 01/07/2013 . If petitioner surrenders by that time, the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, named above, on bail, on furnishing bail bond o...
Jitan Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.4902of2004 Jitan Petitioner Versus CentralCoalfieldsLtd.,Ranchi&others Respondents CORAM :HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner :None FortheRespondents :M/s.AnandaSen&K.Panda,Advocate 11/20.06.2013 Despiterepeatedcalls,nobodyappearedonbehalfof the petitioner, though learned counsel for the respondents is presentintheCourt. Onthelastdatei.e.,14.06.2013alsonobodyappeared onbehalfofthepetitioner. Evenotherwiseinviewofthefindingrecordedbythe EnquiryOfficerandthestatementofthewitnesswhichfindplace atparagraph45and46oftheenquiryproceeding,whereunderit hasbeenrecordedthatnameoffatherinlawofthepetitioneris SobhiMandal,Ifindnomeritinthewritpetition. Accordingly,thiswritpetitionisdismissed. (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) R.ShekharCp2...
Bhabani Shankar Mohapatra Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2177 of 2013 Bhabani Shankar Mohapatra .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Das For the State: Mr. Prem Prakash, APP 2/20.06.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Bhabani Shankar Mohapatra is moved by Sri A.K. Das and opposed by Sri Prem Prakash, learned Additional P.P. This is a case under sections 498(A), 323, 406 and 120 B of the Indian Penal Code and under section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Petitioner is husband of the complainant. It appears that petitioner has filed a divorce suit vide C.P. Case No. 85 of 2012 in Family Court, Puri on 19.05.2013. It then appears that the present complaint case filed on 25.5.2012. It is stated that the said complaint filed after knowing that a divorce suit has been filed at Puri. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and dir...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »