Jharkhand Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shankar Ram Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(D.B.)No.988of2012 ShankarRam ... Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand ... ... ... Respondent CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR FortheAppellant :Mr.AtanuBanerjee,Advocate FortheState :Mr.R.Mukhopadhyay,S.C.II th 09/Dated:6March,2013 PerD.N.Patel,J.1. This criminalappealhas beenadmittedvideorderdated23rd January,2013.RecordsandproceedingsofSessionsTrialNo.269of 2004 was called for from the trial court, so as to appreciate the argumentsforsuspensionofsentenceunderSection389Cr.P.C.2. This appellant has been convicted by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bermo at Tenughat in Sessions Trial No. 269 of 2004 vide orderdated1/3August2012,mainlyfortheoffenceofmurderofhis wife,punishableunderSection302oftheIndianPenalCodeforlife imprisonment.3. This Court has received the records and proceedings of SessionsTrialNo.269of2004.Wehaveperusedthesameindetail.4. Wehaveheardthelearnedcounselforboththesidesatgreat length.Counselfo...
Asej Dang Alias Dharma Alias Sameer Alias Jhamra Vs. the State of Jhar ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 1040 of 2013 Asej Dang @ Dharma @ Sameer @ Jhamra ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmad, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 06.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 25 (1-B)(a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act, in connection with Kolebira P.S. Case No. 55 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 391 of 2011(S). The petitioner was not apprehended at the spot, rather, he was named by the apprehended co-accused to be one of the persons, who managed to flee away. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Asej Dang @ Dharma @ Sameer @ Jhamra, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond o...
Gajadhar Rajak Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 1217 of 2013 Gajadhar Rajak ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 06.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 451 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 813 of 2012. From the FIR, it appears that the petitioner is alleged to be involved in black marketing of rice. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Gajadhar Rajak, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate...
Dinesh Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.M.P.No.2828of2012 DineshSingh................. Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhand Opp.Party Coram: HonbleMr.JusticeR.R.Prasad ForthePetitioner :Mr.RajanRaj,Advocate FortheState :Mr.APP ....... 2./06.03.2013 Thisapplicationhasbeenfiledforquashingoftheordersdated 05/12/2011, 18/04/2012, and 24/09/2012, passed in connection with Topchanchi P.S. Case No. 34/2009, G.R. No. 996/2009, whereby and whereunder,warrantofarrest,processesunderSection82aswellas83 Cr.P.C.wereorderedtobeissuedagainstthepetitioner. Mr. Rajan Raj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitsthatacasewaslodgedunderSection414oftheIndianPenalCode in which the name of this petitioner was never there as an accused. Subsequently, in course of investigation, name of this petitioner does transpireandonlyonthatbasisarequisitionwassentbytheInvestigating OfficerbeforetheCourtbelowforissuanceofwarrantofarrestagainsthim andonsuchrequisitionwarrantofarresthasbeenissuedvideorderdated 05/12/...
Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors. Vs. Jamuna Harizan ? Jamuna Ahirwa
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A No. 33 of 2010 Central Coalfields Limited & Ors... ... Appellants Vs. Jamuna Harizan @ Jamuna Ahirwar... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellants : M/s Ananda Sen, Rajnaj Kumar, Nagmani Tiwary & Kautav Panda For the Respondents : M/s Sumeet Gadodia, Prem Pujari Roy & Om Prakash Prasad ------ Dated 6th March, 2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. It is stated that the writ petitioner-respondent initially was appointed with the name Jamuna Harizan with his father's name Jugal Mochi. The petitioner was appointed on 19.12.1977 and during his long tenure, the petitioner's surname was changed from Harizan to Ahirwar. Then it is alleged that his father's name was also changed to Jugal Ahirwar and then to Jugnoo Ahirwar. The date of birth of the petitioner in Form 'B' was recorded as 3.05.1955 whereas the management subsequently declared the petitioner's date of birth as...
Smt.K.Renuka Devi Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 6180 of 2006 Smt. K. Renuka Devi ... ... ... Petitioner Versus Union of India and others ... ... Respondents With M.A. No. 303 of 2006 Smt. K. Renuka Devi and others ... ... Appellants Versus Smt. K. Rama Devi ... ... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH ............ For the Petitioners : Mr. Akshay Kumar Mahato (In both cases) For the Respondents : Mr. A.K. Das (In both cases) ........ 11/06.03.2013 These applications shall be heard. Respondents have appeared and filed their counter- affidavit. No notice is required to be issued. Counsel for the respondent-Union of India may seek latest instruction in the matter, whether the claim of the deceased employee has been disbursed in favour of one or other persons in the meantime. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) Sunil/ Binit...
Sakaldeep Singh and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 1186 o1. Sakaldeep Singh 2. Prakash Singh ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Gaurav, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 06.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused for the offences under 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, in connection with Lapung P.S. Case No. 44 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 5848 of 2012. From the FIR, it appears that the petitioners were apprehended along with other co-accused. There is no recovery from the petitioners. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners, Sakaldeep Singh and Prakash Singh, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amou...
Parbati Prasad Ghose Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 4886 of 2009 Parbati Prasad Ghose ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Saibal Mitra, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to Sr. S.C. II ---- I.A. No. 3772/2012 05/06.03.2013 In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for fixing an early date of hearing on admission. It has been stated that petitioner is a retired senior citizen. He has prayed for due fixation of his salary, due to which his pensionary benefit has not been duly fixed. The petitioner is facing hardship due to wrong fixation of pension and other benefits. Learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents, has not dispute the first submission and has not opposed the application. Considering that the petitioner is an old pensioner/senior citizen and the matter relates to pensionary benefits, this I.A. is allowed. Office is directed to list W.P.(S) No. 4886 of 2009 on 1...
Ramesh Ghoshal Alias Ramesh Chandra Ghoshal Vs. the Stae of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No. 1076 of 2012 Ramesh Ghoshal @ Ramesh Chandra Ghoshal...Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ..............Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:Mr.Manoj Kumar 10/ 6.3.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Bodan Hembrom Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 1221 of 2013 Bodan Hembrom ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Tejo Mistry, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 06.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 25(1-B)(a)/26 of the Arms Act, in connection with Parsudih (Sundernagar) P.S. Case No. 173 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 2292 of 2012. The petitioner was apprehended on 15.8.2012 and from his possession, two country-made pistols were recovered. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Bodan Hembrom, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri T. Ahmad, learn...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »