Jharkhand Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kaushalya Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited Vs. Road Cons ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 4220 of 2012 --- Kaushalya Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Rohit Roy, Advocate For the Respondents: JC to AG --- I.A. No. 2928/2013 09/ 06.03.2013 It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the prayer made in the instant interlocutory application has been rendered infructuous during the pendency of this writ application. Accordingly, it is disposed of as infructuous. I.A. No. 1179/2013 This instant interlocutory application has been preferred on behalf of the respondents for seeking vacation of the interim order dated 24th September 2012. It is submitted that the Bank guarantee which has been restrained from encashment, is going to expire on 30th March 2013 and the petitioner has not yet renewed the same. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes, on ins...
Munni Lal Sahu ? Ramanand Sahu Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2099 of 2011 Munni Lal Sahu @ Ramanand Sahu Petitioner -V e r s u s- The Union of India & Ors. ... ... Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : - M/s A. K. Sahani For the Respondents : - Md. M. Khan, ASGI 11 06.03.2013 As per the report of the process server, notices have been validly served upon the respondent nos. 2 to 4. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 is official respondent represented through counsel for the Union of India and his name is also appearing in the cause list, therefore, notice is treated to be validly served upon respondent no. 1 as well. Accordingly, notices are treated to be validly served upon the respondent nos. 2 to 4 as well as respondent no.1. Let the case be listed under the heading For Admission in 3rd week of April, 2013. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) Kamlesh/...
Bharat Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(T)No.858of2012 With W.P.(T)Nos.3061,3062,3063,3064,3065, 3066,3092&944of2012 BharatSingh .... .... .... .... Petitioner Versus UnionofIndia&Ors. .... .... .... ....Respondents CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.BinodPoddar,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mr.DeepakRoshan,Advocate th OrderNo.13 Dated,6 March,2013 Learnedcounselfortherespondentsubmittedthathe hasreceivedthecopyoftherejoinderandhewantstogothrough therejoinder,thereforesometimemaybegranted. As prayed, list this matter along with W.P. (T) No. 3021of2012on4thApril,2013. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (JayaRoy,J.) SI/Anit...
Jalan Carbons and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C). No.4467 of 2010 M/s Bansal Industrial Gases( Bihar) Limited ..... Petitioner Versus Jharkhand State Electricity Board & Ors. ........ Respondents with W.P.(C). No.5072 of 2003 Jalan Carbonds & Chemicals Ltd. ..... Petitioner Versus Jharkhand State Electricity Board & Ors. ........ Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. D. Poddar For the Board : M/s Ajit Kumar & Saket Upadhayay I.A. Nos. 3210 of 2011 and 3655 of 2012 in W.P.C. No. 4467 o04. 06.03.2013 During the pendency of the writ petition the final bill raised by the respondent- Board has been challenged through I.A. No. 3120 of 2011 and subsequently the notice issued under the certificate proceeding for realization of the said due has been challenged in I.A. No. 3655 of 2012. For the reasons stated in the I.A.s, prayer made in the instant interlocutory applications are allowed to be incorporated in the main writ application. Coun...
Sanjay Ram Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 1036 of 2013 Sanjay Ram ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mrs. Suman Tripathy, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 06.03.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 457, 380 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Sadar (Town) P.S. Case No. 471 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 1863 of 2012. The case relates to theft in a house, from where, it appears that firearms were also stolen. It appears from the impugned order that the petitioner is in custody since 22.10.2012 and from the house of the petitioner some cartridges were recovered. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Sanjay Ram, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on ...
Ajay Pradhan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 304 of 2013 Ajay Pradhan .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. K.P.Deo For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 06.03.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in connection with PCR case No. 187 of 2012 for the offence registered under sections 420/406/409/323/427/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. It reveals that Shankar Paswan, accused no.1 in the complaint, had taken an amount of 3,35,000/- from the complainant on the promise that he would repay the said sum within six months. When the complainant started chasing for refund of the amount paid by him, Shankar Paswan along with this petitioner came on a Scorpio vehicle and threatened the complainant. At the relevant time, the petitioner was havi...
Sulochana Sharma and anr Vs. State of Bihar and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 40 of 2012 Sulochana Sharma & Anr. Petitioners -V e r s u s- The State of Bihar and Ors. Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH. For the Petitioners : - M/s Lalit Kr. Lal, Advocate For the Respondents :- JC to SC-III I. A. No. 924 o06. 06.03.2013 The present C. M. P. has been preferred by wife and son of the writ petitioner in W. P. (S) No. 4097 of 2002 for restoration of the said writ petition, which was dismissed for default on 22.10.2008. It is submitted by counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that their substitution petition for substitution of the main writ petitioner on account of his death on 30.10.2002 had already been filed in the main writ petition being I. A. No. 2374 of 2002 on 20.12.2002. It is, however, submitted that because of the some reason or the other, the present petitioners could not be substituted and the writ petition was dismissed for default. The writ petition related to payment...
Ramesh Yadav Alias Teklal Gope Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.M.P.No.393of2013 RameshYadav@TeklalGope Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.DilipKr.Jaiswal,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/06.03.2013 ThisCr.M.P.hasbeenfiledtorestoreA.B.A.No.2934of2012whichhas beendismissedfornonprosecution. IamnotsatisfiedwiththegroundstakeninthisCr.M.P.forrestorationof theA.B.A.Accordingly,thisCr.M.P.standsdismissed. However,thepetitionershallbeatlibertytofilefreshbailapplicationfor whichthereisnobar. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC...
JamiruddIn Ansari and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 322 o1. Jamiruddin Ansari 2. Yasin Ansari 3. Ibrahim Ansari 4. Altu @ Javed Ansari .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Sanjay Kr Tiwari For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 06.03.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in connection with Pindrajora PS case No. 17 of 2012 for the offence registered under sections 448/341/323/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the FIR that the accused persons assaulted informant and also took away Rs. 2,300/- from a box. It is submitted that the informant and the accused persons are relatives and they live in two parts in the very same house. The allegation of theft has been super added to make the offence serious. Learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer...
Kedar Singh Vs. State of Jahrkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 435 of 2011 Kedar Singh . Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand Opp. Party ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate For the State : APP ----- 08/06.03.2013: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State The order dated 21.09.2010 passed in connection with Topchanchi (Hariharpur) P.S. Case No.48 of 2010 (G.R. No.530 of 2010) whereby and whereunder, cognizance of the offence has been taken against the petitioner, is being sought to be quashed on the ground that the instant prosecution is tainted with malice and, therefore, prosecution is fit to be quashed. Learned counsel, in this respect, submits that before the case was lodged by the Opposite Party No.2, the petitioner had lodged a case against the complainant and in order to save the skin, the instant prosecution has been lodged to put pressure upon the petitioner to withdraw th...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »