JamiruddIn Ansari and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand

JamiruddIn Ansari and ors vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Mar 06, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971816

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/971816
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Mar 06, 2013
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

JamiruddIn Ansari and ors

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. no. 322 o”1. jamiruddin ansari 2. yasin ansari 3. ibrahim ansari 4. altu @ javed ansari .... petitioner(s) versus state of jharkhand ... opposite party coram : honble mr. justice d.n.upadhyay for the petitioner (s): mr. sanjay kr tiwari for the opposite party : addl.p.p. 06.03.2013 heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the state. this is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in connection with pindrajora ps case no. 17 of 2012 for the offence registered under sections 448/341/323/379/34 of the indian penal code. it is alleged in the fir that the accused persons assaulted informant and also took away rs. 2,300/- from a box. it is submitted that the informant and the accused persons are relatives and they live in two parts in the very same house. the allegation of theft has been super added to make the offence serious. learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer. considering above aspects of the matter, all the four petitioners above named are directed to appear/ surrender before the court below within a period of three weeks positively from the date of this order and on their surrender, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, bokaro, in connection with pindrajora ps case no. 17 of 2012 ( g. r no. 1838/2012), subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) cr.p.c. ambastha/- ( d.n.upadhyay,j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 322 o”

1. Jamiruddin Ansari 2. Yasin Ansari 3. Ibrahim Ansari 4. Altu @ Javed Ansari .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Sanjay Kr Tiwari For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 06.03.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in connection with Pindrajora PS case No. 17 of 2012 for the offence registered under sections 448/341/323/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the FIR that the accused persons assaulted informant and also took away Rs. 2,300/- from a box. It is submitted that the informant and the accused persons are relatives and they live in two parts in the very same house. The allegation of theft has been super added to make the offence serious. Learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer. Considering above aspects of the matter, all the four petitioners above named are directed to appear/ surrender before the court below within a period of three weeks positively from the date of this order and on their surrender, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bokaro, in connection with Pindrajora PS case No. 17 of 2012 ( G. R no. 1838/2012), subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.)

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties JamiruddIn Ansari and ors vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Criminal