Jharkhand Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Devendra Pandey Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.710of2013 DevendraPandey .... .... . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... .... Opp.Party CORAM :HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.BirendraBurman,Advocate FortheOpp.Party :A.P.P. 02/05.02.2013 Heard counsel appearing for the petitioner and counsel appearingfortheState. PetitionerisanaccusedinthiscaseregisteredunderSection 392oftheIndianPenalCode. Counselappearingforthepetitionerhassubmittedthatthe petitionerisnotnamedintheF.I.R.,hisnamehasbeenaddedduring investigation.Itisalsosubmittedthatnothinghasbeenrecoveredfrom his possession. It is further submitted that another coaccused namely ImtyazAnsari@Jagia@Sitan,whowasidentifiedbytheinformant,has beenenlargedonbailbyanotherBenchofthisCourtinB.A.No.6871of 2012videorderdated20thSeptember,2012.Itisalsosubmittedthatthe petitionerisincustodysince27.09.2012i.e.morethanfourmonths. CounselappearingfortheStatehasopposedandsubmitted thatthechargesheethasalreadybeensubmittedagainstthepe...
Md Nawab Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A.No. 72 of 2013 Pappu Singh. ... ... ...Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ...Opp. Party ---------- CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the Petitioner: Mr. Gaurav Priyadershi, Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. ---------- 03/ 05.02.2013 The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 395/397 of the Indian Penal Code. It is a case of road robbery in which the informant and other passers by were looted by the miscreants on the point of pistol. During investigation, two looted motorcycles have been recovered from possession of this petitioner. It is submitted that other co-accused-Surendra Lohra @ Gudan from whose possession one looted motorcycle was recovered, has been granted bail on 7.12.2012 vide B.A.No. 8100 of 2012. The petitioner was neither put on T.I.P. nor named by any witness. He is in custody for last one year. At best he can be held liable for the offence punishable under Section 412 of the ...
Ramjee Kewat Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A.No.51 o1. Ramjee Kewat.2. Mohan @ Basu Kewat. ... ... ...Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ...Opp. Party ---------- CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the Petitioners: Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. ---------- 02/ 05.02.2013 The petitioners are accused in a case registered under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The deceased-daughter of the informant was subjected to torture and treated with cruelty for want of more dowry during her lifetime and finally she has been done to death within seven years of her marriage. It is submitted that the deceased fell down from the motorcycle as a result she sustained injury for which she was treated in the Hospital but could not survive. Considering this aspect of the matter, the husband has been granted bail by a Bench of this court on 2.7.2012 vide B.A.No. 2238 of 2012. Counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Since the husband is enjoy...
Wakil Ansari Alias Vakil Ansari Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 390 of 2013 Wakil Ansari @ Vakil Ansari ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Jashodhara Tripathy For the State :A. P.P. ----- 04/05.02.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Patratu (Bhurkunda) P.S. Case No. 112 of 2010, corresponding to G.R. No. 1655 of 2010. The case relates to the theft of a Tempo. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Wakil Ansari @ Vakil Ansari is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Hazaribagh, in connection with Patratu (Bhurkunda) P.S. Case No. 11...
Ajit Pal and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 160 o1. Ajit Pal; 2. Chandrai Tudu @ Chandra Rai Tudu .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr.S.P.Roy For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 05.02.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are accused in connection with Ramgarh PS case No. 21 of 2011 for the offence registered under sections 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code, and section 17 of the CLA Act. It reveals from FIR that the accused persons had been to the village for levy and they were threatening the villagers to pay rangdari. On receipt of information, the village was raided in which one of the co-accused Mahavir Rai was apprehended. On interrogation, he disclosed names of these petitioners and his associates, who succeeded to flee away. It is submitted that other accused persons with similar allegations have been granted bail vide BA ...
Rajesh Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 4295 of 2012 ----- Rajesh Mahto Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. A.K.Chaturvedi For the State : Sri.P.K.Choudhary, A.P.P. ----- 04/05.02.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Rajesh Mahto is moved by Sri. A.K.Chaturvedi , learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri. P.K.Choudhary , Addl P.P. for the State. There is general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons. No overt act alleged against the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 14/02/2013. If petitioner surrenders by that time, the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, named above, on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction...
Amit Kumar Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 576 of 2013 Amit Kumar Mahto ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Usha Devi @ Anita ... ... ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Bihari Lal, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 02/05.02.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A), 376, 511 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the case was registered under Section 498(A), 376, 511 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, but the police has submitted charge sheet against the petitioner only under Section 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry prohibition Act after investigation. It is also submitted that there is no specific allegation against...
Vijay Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A.No. 53 of 2013 Vijay Sahu. ... ... ...Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ...Opp. Party ---------- CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Kumar Ganjhu, Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. ---------- 02/ 05.02.2013 The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 385/387 of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from the written report that Rangdari was demanded from the informant for which he received call in his mobile set. The SIM card and mobile set used for making call for Rangdari have been recovered on the basis of confession made by this accused. It is submitted that it is not a case under Section 387 of the I.P.C. Furthermore, the petitioner has already remained in custody for about six months. The other two accused have been granted bail by the court-below. There is delay in lodging the F.I.R. Counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering the period of detention of ...
Ramani Dhibar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.669of2013 RamaniDhibar .... .... . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... .... Opp.Party CORAM:HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.R.P.Mukherjee,Advocate FortheOpp.Party :A.P.P. 02/05.02.2013 Heard counsel appearingforthepetitionerandcounsel appearingfortheState. Petitioner is an accused in this case registered under Section290oftheIndianPenalCodeandSection47AoftheExcise Act. Counselappearingforthepetitionerhassubmittedthatthe allegationagainstthepetitioneristhat100litreswinewasrecovered fromhispossession.Itisalsosubmittedthatthepetitionerisincustody since30thDecember,2012i.e.morethanonemonth. Counsel appearing for the State has not disputed the contentionsmadebythecounselforthepetitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of custody of the petitioner, the petitioner, abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedonbail,onfurnishingbailbond ofRs.10,000/(Rs.Tenthousand)withtwosuretiesoflikeamoun...
Sujeet Sinha Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 200 of 2013 Sujeet Sinha ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Md. Faruque Ansari For the State :A. P.P. ----- 04/05.02.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 385, 386, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No. 318 of 2010, corresponding to G.R. No. 1181 of 2010. From the F.I.R., it appears that two unknown persons came to the shop of the informant and demanded levy in the name of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 20.07.2011. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Sujeet Sinha is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »