Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramjee Kewat Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Ramjee Kewat vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Feb 05, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971606

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramjee Kewat

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a.no.51 o”1. ramjee kewat.2. mohan @ basu kewat. ... ... ...petitioners -versus- the state of jharkhand. ... ... ...opp. party ---------- coram: the honble mr. justice d.n.upadhyay for the petitioners: mr. atanu banerjee, advocate. for the state: a.p.p. ---------- 02/ 05.02.2013 the petitioners are accused in a case registered under sections 304(b)/34 of the indian penal code. the deceased-daughter of the informant was subjected to torture and treated with cruelty for want of more dowry during her lifetime and finally she has been done to death within seven years of her marriage. it is submitted that the deceased fell down from the motorcycle as a result she sustained injury for which she was treated in the hospital but could not survive. considering this aspect of the matter, the husband has been granted bail by a bench of this court on 2.7.2012 vide b.a.no. 2238 of 2012. counsel for the state has opposed the prayer. since the husband is enjoying the privilege of bail, i feel inclined to give same benefit to the other relatives and accordingly, the petitioners, who are the father- in-law and the brother-in-law (bhaisur) are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the s.d.j.m., bermo at tenughat in connection with bermo (gandhinagar) p.s. case no. 44 of 2011, corresponding to g.r.no.351 of 2011 (t.r.no.2088 of 2012). [d.n.upadhyay,j.] p.k.s.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A.No.51 o”

1. Ramjee Kewat.

2. Mohan @ Basu Kewat. ... ... ...Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ...Opp. Party ---------- CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the Petitioners: Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. ---------- 02/ 05.02.2013 The petitioners are accused in a case registered under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The deceased-daughter of the informant was subjected to torture and treated with cruelty for want of more dowry during her lifetime and finally she has been done to death within seven years of her marriage. It is submitted that the deceased fell down from the motorcycle as a result she sustained injury for which she was treated in the Hospital but could not survive. Considering this aspect of the matter, the husband has been granted bail by a Bench of this court on 2.7.2012 vide B.A.No. 2238 of 2012. Counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Since the husband is enjoying the privilege of bail, I feel inclined to give same benefit to the other relatives and accordingly, the petitioners, who are the father- in-law and the brother-in-law (Bhaisur) are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Bermo (Gandhinagar) P.S. Case No. 44 of 2011, corresponding to G.R.No.351 of 2011 (T.R.No.2088 of 2012). [D.N.Upadhyay,J.] P.K.S.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial