Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devendra Pandey Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Devendra Pandey vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Feb 05, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971554

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devendra Pandey

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi b.a.no.710of2013 devendrapandey .... .... . petitioner versus thestateofjharkhand .... .... .... opp.party coram :hon'blemrs.justicejayaroy forthepetitioner :mr.birendraburman,advocate fortheopp.party :a.p.p. 02/05.02.2013 heard counsel appearing for the petitioner and counsel appearingforthestate. petitionerisanaccusedinthiscaseregisteredundersection 392oftheindianpenalcode. counselappearingforthepetitionerhassubmittedthatthe petitionerisnotnamedinthef.i.r.,hisnamehasbeenaddedduring investigation.itisalsosubmittedthatnothinghasbeenrecoveredfrom his possession. it is further submitted that another coaccused namely imtyazansari@jagia@sitan,whowasidentifiedbytheinformant,has beenenlargedonbailbyanotherbenchofthiscourtinb.a.no.6871of 2012videorderdated20thseptember,2012.itisalsosubmittedthatthe petitionerisincustodysince27.09.2012i.e.morethanfourmonths. counselappearingforthestatehasopposedandsubmitted thatthechargesheethasalreadybeensubmittedagainstthepetitioner. considering the facts and circumstances of the case and consideringthefactthattheanothercoaccused,whohasbeenidentified bytheinformant,hasbeengrantedbailbyanotherbenchofthiscourtas statedearlier,thepetitioner,abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedon bail,onfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rs.tenthousand)withtwo suretiesoflikeamounteachtothesatisfactionofshrir.srivastava,civil judge(jr.division)iv,kodermainconnectionwithmarkachop.s.case no.36of2012correspondingtog.r.no.293of2012withtheconditions thatoneofthebailorswillbelocalresidenthavingimmovableproperty withinthejurisdictionofdistrictconcernedandthepetitionerwillremain presentbeforethetrialcourtatleastonceinamonthonthedatefixed fortrialtilltheconclusionoftrial. (jayaroy,j.) anit

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.710of2013 DevendraPandey .... .... . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... .... Opp.Party CORAM :HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.BirendraBurman,Advocate FortheOpp.Party :A.P.P. 02/05.02.2013 Heard counsel appearing for the petitioner and counsel appearingfortheState. PetitionerisanaccusedinthiscaseregisteredunderSection 392oftheIndianPenalCode. Counselappearingforthepetitionerhassubmittedthatthe petitionerisnotnamedintheF.I.R.,hisnamehasbeenaddedduring investigation.Itisalsosubmittedthatnothinghasbeenrecoveredfrom his possession. It is further submitted that another coaccused namely ImtyazAnsari@Jagia@Sitan,whowasidentifiedbytheinformant,has beenenlargedonbailbyanotherBenchofthisCourtinB.A.No.6871of 2012videorderdated20thSeptember,2012.Itisalsosubmittedthatthe petitionerisincustodysince27.09.2012i.e.morethanfourmonths. CounselappearingfortheStatehasopposedandsubmitted thatthechargesheethasalreadybeensubmittedagainstthepetitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and consideringthefactthattheanothercoaccused,whohasbeenidentified bytheinformant,hasbeengrantedbailbyanotherBenchofthisCourtas statedearlier,thepetitioner,abovenamed,isdirectedtobereleasedon bail,onfurnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/(Rs.Tenthousand)withtwo suretiesoflikeamounteachtothesatisfactionofShriR.Srivastava,Civil Judge(Jr.Division)IV,KodermainconnectionwithMarkachoP.S.Case No.36of2012correspondingtoG.R.No.293of2012withtheconditions thatoneofthebailorswillbelocalresidenthavingimmovableproperty withinthejurisdictionofdistrictconcernedandthepetitionerwillremain presentbeforethetrialCourtatleastonceinamonthonthedatefixed fortrialtilltheconclusionoftrial. (JayaRoy,J.) Anit

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial