Jharkhand Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sharawan Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3632 of 2012 Sharawan Kumar ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. S.P. Roy For the Opp. Party : Mr. Manoj Kumar No.-4, A.P.P. ........ 3/10.01.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Sharawan Kumar is moved by Sri S.P. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Manoj Kumar No.-4, learned Additional PP. for the State. F.I. R. reveals that informant, who is a police officer received confidential information that Truck bearing registration No. UP-65R 208.(owned by the petitioner) loaded with illicit coal will pass through Maharo more. On the said confidential information, informant went to Maharo more, but the said Truck did not pass through aforesaid area. However, informant suspected that before he reach to Maharo More, said truck would had already passed. There is no basis for coming to suc...
Ramesh Kumar Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 7034 of 2012 --- Ramesh Kumar Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sujit Narayan Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Miss Sunita Prasad, J.C. to Sr.S.C. II --- 2/10.01.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite repeated requests, rent for the rented accommodation has not been paid by the respondents. He further submits that petitioner has already moved a representation claiming the rent on 15.09.2012, annexure no. 2, however, no decision has been taken thereon as yet. Miss Sunita Kumari, learned J.C. to Sr.S.C. II submits that an appropriate decision shall be taken by the respondent no. 6 on annexure no. 2 in accordance with law, preferably within 60 days from today and the rent found due shall be paid to the petitioner soon thereafter. Mr. S. N. Prasad submits that present petition be disposed of in the light of th...
Jitendra Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 1538 of 2008 --- Jitendra Mahto --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. K.K. Singh, Advocate For the State: JC to SC-II --- 04/ 10.01.2013 Heard counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner has approached this court for directing the respondents to pursue the Grievance Redressal Mechanism at the block level of village Palajori in the district of Deoghar for dealing with the complaints relating to implementation of Narega scheme.3. According to the petitioner, construction of some check dam was being made under the village Dubrajpur without complying with the conditions of Narega shceme.4. Respondents, on the other hand, through their counter affidavit, have stated that on inquiry, it was found that there was no violation of the terms and conditions of the Narega scheme for which an inquiry was conducted by the Ex...
Pachu Rana Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. A.B.A.No. 3348 of 2012 ----- Pachu Rana Petitioner. Versus State of Jharkhand Opp.party . ------ Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. A.K.Sahani For the State : Sri. S.S.Sahay, APP ----- 05/10.01. 2013. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to raise all the points in the court below while moving the regular bail application. With the aforesaid liberty this application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Raman/Tanuj...
Jiyafat Mian Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B.)No. 879 of 2008 Jiyafat Mian @ Ziyafat Mian.... ... ... ... ...Appellant -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ... ...Respondent -------------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY -------------- For the Appellant: Mr. P.K.Verma, Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. -------------- 08/ Dated 10th January, 2013 Oral order: Per D.N.Patel,J:1. This appeal is admitted. Records and proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 55 of 2000/ Trial No.42 of 2007 is called for from the Trial Court so as to reach to this Court on or before the next date of hearing to appreciate the arguments for suspension of sentence.2. We, hereby, direct the Registry to get the paper book prepared with neatly typed copies of the deposition of the witnesses and other evidence, as required under Rule 190 and 191 of the Jharkhand High Court, Rules, 2001.2. The matter is adjourned on 30.01.2013. [D.N.Patel,J.] [D.N.Upadhyay,J.] P.K.S....
Sita Ram Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 2064 of 2005 Sita Ram Prasad Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Dr. S.N.Pathak, Sr. Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Saket Upadhyay, J.C. to A.A.G ----------- 07/09.01.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. In the instant writ application petitioner has sought direction upon the respondents to consider his case for promotion from 1994 from the date on which his juniors were promoted. According to the petitioner he was appointed as a writer constable on 14.2.1966 and promoted as Assistant Sub Inspector of police in the year 1971. Later on he was promoted as Sub Inspector of Police in the parent State of Bihar . After the bifurcation of the State of Bihar he was posted within the State of Jharkhand and retired on 1.7.2004. As per the petitioner, although in the year 2001 in the seniority list the petitioner was at Serial ...
Md Javed Alias Jawed Alam Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGHCOURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 3321 of 2012 ----- Md. Javed @ Jawed Alam Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. P.Chatterjee For the State : Sri.S.S.Sahay, A.P.P. ----- 05/10.01.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Md. Javed @ Jawed Alam is moved by Sri. P.Chatterjee, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri. S.S.Sahay , Addl P.P. for the State. It is alleged that petitioner took Rs.47,000/- from complainant on the inducement that a mobile tower will be installed on his land. But after receiving the said money, neither the tower installed nor the money returned. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, as a condition for bail, his client is ready to return Rs. 47,000/- to the complainant without prejudiced to his case. In view of the aforesaid statement , I allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender i...
Hasim Akhtar Alias Md Hasim Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3624 of 2012 Hasim Akhtar @ Md. Hasim ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Azeemuddin For the Opp. Party : Mr. Prakash Kumar Sahay, A.P.P. ........ 3/10.01.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Hasim Akhtar @ Md. Hasim is moved by Sri Azeemuddin learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Prakash Kumar Sahay, learned Additional PP. for the State. Petitioner is not named in the first information report. It appears that he has been implicated in this case on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused Arun Agrawal. There is no allegation that petitioner received money from any person. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 22nd of January 2013 and in the event of his surre...
Md Khurshid Anwer Vs. Rural Works Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 139 of 2013 Md. Khurshid Anwer ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Saurabh Arun, Advocate For the Respondents : JC to G.A ----- 02/10.01.2013 The petitioner has challenged the impugned transfer order dated 29.12.2012, whereby he has been transferred from Rural Work Subdivision, Giridih-II to N.R.E.P., Giridih. The grievance of the petitioner is that by the impugned order, he has been displaced from his present posting in Rural Work Sub- division, Giridih-II within three months. The order is arbitrary and illegal. Learned JC to G.A., appearing on behalf of the respondents, vehemently opposed the writ petition and submitted that petitioner 's place of posting at Giridih has not been changed, only the department has been changed from Works Sub-division, Giridih-2 to N.R.E.P., Giridih due to administrative exigency. The allegation of ...
Talomuni Devi Vs. M/S Central Coalfields Ltd. and
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 2041 of 2011 Talomuni Devi ..Petitioner Versus M/s C.C.L. & Others .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ananda Sen, Advocate ----- 03/10.01.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents have issued letter dated 01.12.2012 informing the petitioner about reconsideration of her case for appointment on compassionate ground. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. Permission is granted This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »