Skip to content

Jharkhand Court September 2012 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Sep 17 2012

Md.Nashim and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-17-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3839 o1. Md. Nashim 2. Kanija Khatoon 3. Sarjahan Khatoon ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. S.K. Murty, Advocate ------ 5/ 17.09.2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this application has become infractuous. This bail application is, accordingly, dismissed as infractuous. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr....


Sep 17 2012

Purabdih Matsyajeevi Sahyog Sa Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-17-2012

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(C)No.1544of2012 PurabdihMatsyajeeviSahyogSamitiLtd. ...Petitioner. Versus StateofJharkhand&Ors. ...Respondents. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioner : Mr.SameerSourav,Advocate FortheState : J.C.toG.A. I.A.No.1891of2012:10. 17.09.2012: In this interlocutory application, the applicantGola Matsyajeevi Sahyog Samiti Ltd. has prayed for its addition as respondentinthewritpetition. Ithasbeenstatedthatthepetitionerhaschallengedthe orderoftheRegistrar,CooperativeSocieties,Jharkhanddated 8thJuly,2011,settingasidethedecisionwhichwasinfavourofthe applicant,buttheapplicanthasnotbeenmadepartytothe writpetition. It has beenstatedthat sincetheorder dated 8th July, 2011 passed by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies is in favouroftheapplicant,itisnecessaryparty. Learnedcounselforthewritpetitioneraswellaslearned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents have not disputedthesaidfactualpositionandhavenotcontestedthis application. Considerin...


Sep 17 2012

Rajesh Kumar Tiwari ? Rajesh Tiwary Vs. Rina Devi

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-17-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.Revision No.379 of 2012 ------ Rajesh Kumar Tiwari @ Rajesh Tiwary . Petitioner -Versus- Rina Devi ..... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ I.A No.896 o6. 17.09.2012 The aforesaid interlocutory application has been filed for condonation of delay of 72 days in filing the revision application. In view of the statements made in the interlocutory application, the delay in filing the revision application is hereby, condoned. Accordingly, the aforesaid I.A stands allowed. (H.C.Mishra, J.) B.S/...


Sep 17 2012

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-17-2012

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI I.A.No.1049of2012 IN Cr.Appeal(DB)No.772of2012 ..... ManojKumarSingh ... Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRASHANTKUMAR FortheAppellant : Mr.A.K.Kashyap,Sr.Advocate. Mr.ManojKumarSah,Advocate. FortheRespondent: Mr.T.N.Verma,A.P.P. 04/Dated:September17,2012 PerD.N.Patel,J.1) The present application has been preferred under Section 389(1)oftheCodeofCriminalProcedureforsuspensionofsentence awarded by the trial court in Sessions Case No. 125 of 2005 wherebytheappellant, whoisoriginalaccusedno.1isconvicted mainly for the offence punishable under Section 304B/34 of the IndianPenalCodeforlifeimprisonment.2) WehaveperusedtherecordsandproceedingsofSessionsCase No.125of2005andheardcounselsforboththesides.3) Having heard counsel for both the sides and looking to the evidencesonrecord,thereisprimafaciecaseinfavourofthepresent appellant,whoisoriginalaccusedno.1.Asthecriminalappealis pending,weare...


Sep 17 2012

Rashmi Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-17-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.7166 of 2011 Rashmi Singh . Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioner : Mr. Kalyan Roy, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to A.G. ----- 6/17.09.2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that against the notice dated 28.11.2011, the petitioner has filed reply and also prayed for transfer of the shop in her name long back on 5.12.2011, but no final order has been passed till date. Considering the above, this writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the matter before the concerned respondents. If any such reply/application is still pending, the concerned respondents shall pass appropriate order. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) s.b....


Sep 17 2012

SagiruddIn Ansari Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-17-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 591 of 2012 Sagiruddin Ansari .... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & another ... Opposite Parties Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr.Jitendra Tripathy For the opposite party : Addl.P.P./Mr. Mahesh Tiwari 17.09.2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in connection with complaint case no. 522 of 2011 for the offence registered under sections 498A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from the complaint that Nikhat Sahin was subjected to torture and treated with cruelty for want of more dowry and finally she was driven out from her matrimonial home. It is submitted that the complainant was having illicit relation with Md Sameer with whom she got herself married in the year 2006 and this case has been instituted at the instance of Md. Sameer who is having animosity with ...


Sep 17 2012

Kama Munda and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-17-2012

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No. 2154 of 2011 Rajendra Mahto ... ... Petitioner Vrs. The State of Jharkhand and others ...... Respondents With W.P.(C) No. 2541 of 2011 Kama Munda and others ...... Petitioners Vrs. The State of Jharkhand and others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioners: Mr. Shreeprakash Jha, Sr. Adv. (In W.P(PIL)No.2154/2011) Mr. Sunil Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Petitioners: M/s Chandra Deo Singh, Adv. (In W.P(C) No.2541/2011) Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Sahu, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr. R.R. Mishra(G.P.II) (In both cases) Mr. Ramprakash Singh, J.C. to G.P.II Mr. Sameer Saurabh (for Intervenor) ------ Reportable Dated 17th September 2012. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. A writ petition being W.P.(PIL) No.2154 of 2011 has been filed by one Rajendra Mahto questioning the action of the respondents whereby the respondents have decided to const...


Sep 17 2012

Makwa Khatoon and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-17-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.5579 of 2012 ------ 1. Makwa Khatoon 2. Sarfuddin Mian . Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Anr. ..... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr.Arwind Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. For the Opp.Party no.2 : Mr.S.K.Pandey, Advocate. ------ 5/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as also learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the complainant opposite party No.2. The petitioners have been made accused in Complaint Case No.227 of 2011 for the offence under Sections 323, 504, 379, 498A of the I.P.C. and Sections 3 / 4 of the D.P.Act. The petitioners are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the victim lady and there is allegation against them also to have subjected her to cruelty and torture for the demand of dowry. There are other allegations also against the father-in-law. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the...


Sep 17 2012

Kunti Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-17-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3168 of 2012 Kunti Devi ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Renu Bala, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prem Prakash, A.P.P. ------ 5/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Chouparan P.S. Case No. 75 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 2257 of 2011. The petitioner is the sister-in-law (Gotni) of the deceased and there is allegation against her also to have subjected the deceased to cruelty and torture and to have committed her dowry death. In the facts of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Kunti Devi, being the sister-in-law (Gotni) of the deceased, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnis...


Sep 17 2012

Hira Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-17-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHAKHAND,RANCHI Cont(C) No. 95 of 2009 Hira Devi . .. Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand and Ors. . . ..Respondent(s) CORAM :- HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner(s) : Mrs. M.M. Pal Sr. Advocate. For the State of Bihar : MR. S.P. Roy Advocate 18/17.9.2012 By order dated 5.9.2012 the respondents authorities were directed to undertake verification exercise required under requisite rules within a period of one week and the petitioner was also asked to cooperate with the Treasury Officer for necessary verification which was required to be undertaken by the Treasury Officer. Accordingly, the said exercise has been undertaken by the Respondent-Treasury Officer and Banker Cheque bearing No. 125382 dated 11.9.2012 issued by the S.B.I Araria for the month of August, 2012 amounting Rs.6075/- has been prepared in the name of the petitioner and the same has been handed over to the petitioner who is present before this Court and the petitioner has accepted the ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial