Manoj Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi i.a.no.1049of2012 in cr.appeal(db)no.772of2012 ..... manojkumarsingh ... appellant versus thestateofjharkhand ... respondent coram: hon'blemr.justiced.n.patel hon'blemr.justiceprashantkumar fortheappellant : mr.a.k.kashyap,sr.advocate. mr.manojkumarsah,advocate. fortherespondent: mr.t.n.verma,a.p.p. 04/dated:september17,2012 perd.n.patel,j.1) the present application has been preferred under section 389(1)ofthecodeofcriminalprocedureforsuspensionofsentence awarded by the trial court in sessions case no. 125 of 2005 wherebytheappellant, whoisoriginalaccusedno.1isconvicted mainly for the offence punishable under section 304b/34 of the indianpenalcodeforlifeimprisonment.2) wehaveperusedtherecordsandproceedingsofsessionscase no.125of2005andheardcounselsforboththesides.3) having heard counsel for both the sides and looking to the evidencesonrecord,thereisprimafaciecaseinfavourofthepresent appellant,whoisoriginalaccusedno.1.asthecriminalappealis pending,wearenotmuchanalyzing the evidencesonrecord,but suffice it to say that looking to the evidences on record, there is primafaciecaseinfavourofappellantaccused.therefore,wehereby suspendthesentenceawardedtotheappellantinsessionscaseno. 125of2005,duringthependencyof thepresentcriminalappeal, onexecutionofbailbondofrs. 10000/(rupeestenthousand) withtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteach,tothesatisfactionofthe 2 trialcourt/principalsessionsjudge,godda,insessionscaseno. 125of2005andalsoonconditionthatheshallbeavailableinthis courtasandwhenhispresenceisrequiredandalsoonthecondition thatheshallnotchangehisresidentialaddresswithoutpermissionof thiscourt.4) wedirecttheregistrytogetthepaperbookbepreparedwith neatly typed copy of the depositions of the witnesses and other documentsasrequiredunderruleno.190and191ofthehighcourt ofjharkhandrules,2001.5) i.a.no.1049of2012is,accordingly,allowedanddisposedof. (d.n.patel,j) (prashantkumar,j) sharda/sunil/