Jharkhand Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mistry Kisku Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2446 of 2010 Mistry Kisku ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Saurav Arun, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Purnendu Sharan, J.C. to Sr. S.C.-II ----- 4 /19.12.2012 I.A. No. 3202 of 2011 By way of present interlocutory application, petitioner seeks amendment in the writ petition. Amendment, as sought for by the petitioner, seems to be justified for the fair adjudication of the case. For the reasons stated in the interlocutory application, I.A. No.3202 of 2011 is allowed. W.P.(S) No. 2446 of 2010 Let the amended writ petition be placed on record on or before 10th January, 2013 with advance copy to the learned counsel for the Respondents. Counter affidavit, to the amended writ petition, may be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within four weeks thereafter. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K....
Akash Pandit Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3419 o1. Akash Kumar @ Akash Prakash 2.Avinash Pandit @ Avinash Kumar Pandit .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Rakesh Kumar For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 19.12.2012 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioners in connection with Harla PS case No. 57 of 2011 pending in the court of learned SDJM, Bokaro. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application. This application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.)...
Ranjib Narayan Sinha and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1688 of 2011 Ranjib Narayan Sinha and ors. ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH For the Petitioners : Mr. S.N. Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ashok Kumar, J.C. to G.P.-III ----- 3 /19.12.2012 I.A. No. 2004 of 2011 By way of present interlocutory application, petitioners seek amendment in the writ petition. Amendment, as sought for by the petitioners, seems to be justified for the fair adjudication of the case. For the reasons stated in the interlocutory application, I.A. No.2004 of 2011 is allowed. I.A. Nos. 1629/12 & 2249/12 These are the applications seeking stay of the operation of recovery of the excess amount from the salary of the petitioners, pursuant to the impugned order, during the pendency of this writ petition. For the reasons stated in the applications, there shall be no recovery from the petitioners, during the pendency of the writ petition...
Robert Kujur Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(DB)No.433of2012 RobertKujur Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRASHANTKUMAR FortheAppellant : Mr.B.P.Pandey,Sr.Advocate FortheRespondentNo.1: Mr.V.S.Sahay,A.P.P. FortheRespondentNo.2: Mr.Gaurav,Advocate. FortheRespondentNo.3: Mr.H.K.Mahato,Advocate. 10/Dated:December19,2012 PerD.N.Patel,J 1.Having heard counsel for both the sides, this criminal appeal is admitted.2. RecordsandproceedingsofSessionsTrialNo.147of2007iscalled forfromthecourtoflearnedSessionsJudge,Simdega.3. WeherebydirectRegistrytogetthepaperbookbepreparedwith neatly typed copies of depositions of prosecution witnesses and other evidencesonrecordasper Ruleno.190and191oftheHighCourtof JharkhandRules,2001.4. CounselSriGauravisappearingforrespondentno.2andcounsel SriH.K.Mahatoisappearingforrespondentno.3.Therefore,nobailbond isrequired. (D.N.Patel,J) (PrashantKumar,J) Sharda/Sunil/...
Raju Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No.3379 of 2012 Rajukumar. ... ... ...Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Rajkumar Sao. ... ... ...Opp. Parties ---------- CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the Petitioner: Mr. Arshad Hussain, Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. For the O.P.No.2: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate. ---------- 03/ 19.12.2012 The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 406/420 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No. 79 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 1520 of 2012, pending in the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh. It reveals from the Complaint that the petitioner realized Rs. 1,67,500/- from the Complainant on the assurance that vehicle is to be financed in his name. When no vehicle was financed nor the amount was refunded, this case has been lodged. It is submitted that the petitioner did not receive a single coin in his account from the Complainant. This case has been lodge...
Gulam Mohamad Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3759 of 2012 ---- 1.Gulam Mohamad 2.Istkhar Ansari 3.Jahir Ansari .... ... ... .... Petitioners ---Versus--- The State of Jharkhand & Anr. .........Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioners : Mr. Anil Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the Informant : M/s. Rajesh Kumar, N.K.Prasad, Advocates ---- 3/ 19.12.2012 Let this case be tagged with A.B.A. No.3722 of 2012. Till further order, police will not arrest the petitioners namely Gulam Mohamad, Istkhar Ansari and Jahir Ansari in connection with the present case i.e. Koderma (Mahila) P.S. Case No.25 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.725 of 2012, pending in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) V, Koderma. ( Jaya Roy, J.) SI/...
Rajendra Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(DB)No.856of2012 RajendraYadav Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand ... ... ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRASHANTKUMAR FortheAppellant : Mr.A.K.Kashyap,Sr.Advocate Mr.SwamiNathPrasadRoy FortheRespondent: Mr.S.S.Choudhary,A.P.P. OrderNo.8/Dated:19 th December2012 PerD.N.Patel,J1) Presentappealisadmitted.2) RecordsandproceedingsofSessionsCaseNo.41of2010hasalready beencalledforinCr.AppealNo.554of2012(whichwaspreferredbyaccused AmitKumarPaswan,whoisoriginalaccusedNo.2insessionstrial).3) WehaveperusedtherecordsandproceedingsofSessionsCaseNo.41of 2010becauserecordsandproceedingsofCr.AppealNo.554of2012istagged withpresentcriminalappeal.Wehaveheardcounselforboththesidesand looking to the evidences on record, case of prosecution is based upon eye witnessesnamelyP.W.3,P.W6andP.W.10andnoneofthemhavesupported thecaseofprosecution.4) In view of these facts, there is primafacie case in favour of present appellant.We,ther...
Bhuwneshwari Ghorai Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.6332of2010 BhuwneshwariGhorai ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.RaviPrakash,Advocate FortheState :Mr.AshishKumarShekhar,J.C.toG.P.VI I.A.No.2323of2011andI.A.No.2733of2012 03/19.12.2012 Thesearetheapplicationsseekingamendmentinthewritpetition. Forthereasonsstatedintheapplication,amendmentsoughseemsto bejustandproperforfairadjudicationofthecase. Consequently,boththeI.As.areallowed. W.P.(S)No.6332of2010 Let amended writ petition be placed on record on or before 10th of January, 2013 with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the respondents. Letcounteraffidavittotheamendedwritpetitionbefiledwithinnext fourweeks. Rejoinderaffidavit,ifany,maybefiledwithinfourweeksthereafter. Anyappointmentmadeduringthependencyofthewritpetitionshall besubjecttotheoutcomeofthewritpetition. (AlokSingh,J.) Manish...
Amar Nath Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8618 of 2012 Amar Nath Singh ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Ajit Kumar For the State :A. P.P. ----- 03/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 302, 316, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 27 of the Arms Act, in connection with TELCO Govindpur P.S. Case No. 262 of 2009, Sessions Trial No. 280 of 2012. From the F.I.R., it appears that the case relates to the murder of the son of the informant whose dead body was found and the case was instituted against unknown. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out from the impugned order that there is no eye witness to the said occurrence and the petitioner has been named in the confessional statement of the co-accused and, accordingly, has prayed for bail. In t...
Dr.Shyama Raman Pandey Vs. Ranchi University Thr.its Vice
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 2048 of 2009 --- Dr. Shyama Raman Pandey Petitioner Versus Ranchi University & others Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate --- 8/19.12.2012 I. A. No. 2650 of 2011: This interlocutory application has already been allowed vide order dated 02.09.2011, however, it is wrongly shown as pending. I. A. No. 1284 of 2009: Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this application at this stage. Accordingly, I. A. No. 1284 of 2009 is dismissed as not pressed. I. A. No. 3600 of 2012: Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this application at this stage. Accordingly, I. A. No. 3600 of 2012 is dismissed as not pressed. W. P. (S) No. 2048 of 2009: Learned counsel appearing for the Jharkhand State Housing Board, Mr. Sachin Kumar submits that copy of the counter affidavit has already been deliver...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »