Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Robert Kujur Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Robert Kujur vs State of Jharkhand and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Dec 19, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972319

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Robert Kujur

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and ors

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi cr.appeal(db)no.433of2012 robertkujur appellant versus thestateofjharkhand&ors. ... ... ... respondents coram: hon'blemr.justiced.n.patel hon'blemr.justiceprashantkumar fortheappellant : mr.b.p.pandey,sr.advocate fortherespondentno.1: mr.v.s.sahay,a.p.p. fortherespondentno.2: mr.gaurav,advocate. fortherespondentno.3: mr.h.k.mahato,advocate. 10/dated:december19,2012 perd.n.patel,j 1.having heard counsel for both the sides, this criminal appeal is admitted.2. recordsandproceedingsofsessionstrialno.147of2007iscalled forfromthecourtoflearnedsessionsjudge,simdega.3. weherebydirectregistrytogetthepaperbookbepreparedwith neatly typed copies of depositions of prosecution witnesses and other evidencesonrecordasper ruleno.190and191ofthehighcourtof jharkhandrules,2001.4. counselsrigauravisappearingforrespondentno.2andcounsel srih.k.mahatoisappearingforrespondentno.3.therefore,nobailbond isrequired. (d.n.patel,j) (prashantkumar,j) sharda/sunil/

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(DB)No.433of2012 RobertKujur Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRASHANTKUMAR FortheAppellant : Mr.B.P.Pandey,Sr.Advocate FortheRespondentNo.1: Mr.V.S.Sahay,A.P.P. FortheRespondentNo.2: Mr.Gaurav,Advocate. FortheRespondentNo.3: Mr.H.K.Mahato,Advocate. 10/Dated:December19,2012 PerD.N.Patel,J 1.Having heard counsel for both the sides, this criminal appeal is admitted.

2. RecordsandproceedingsofSessionsTrialNo.147of2007iscalled forfromthecourtoflearnedSessionsJudge,Simdega.

3. WeherebydirectRegistrytogetthepaperbookbepreparedwith neatly typed copies of depositions of prosecution witnesses and other evidencesonrecordasper Ruleno.190and191oftheHighCourtof JharkhandRules,2001.

4. CounselSriGauravisappearingforrespondentno.2andcounsel SriH.K.Mahatoisappearingforrespondentno.3.Therefore,nobailbond isrequired. (D.N.Patel,J) (PrashantKumar,J) Sharda/Sunil/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial