Ranjib Narayan Sinha and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Ranjib Narayan Sinha and ors vs State of Jharkhand and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Dec 19, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972311

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/972311
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Dec 19, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ranjib Narayan Sinha and ors

Advocate Mr. S.N. Prasad

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(s) no. 1688 of 2011 ranjib narayan sinha and ors. ..... petitioners versus the state of jharkhand & ors. . respondents coram: honble mr. justice alok singh for the petitioners : mr. s.n. prasad, advocate for the respondents : mr. ashok kumar, j.c. to g.p.-iii ----- 3 /19.12.2012 i.a. no. 2004 of 2011 by way of present interlocutory application, petitioners seek amendment in the writ petition. amendment, as sought for by the petitioners, seems to be justified for the fair adjudication of the case. for the reasons stated in the interlocutory application, i.a. no.2004 of 2011 is allowed. i.a. nos. 1629/12 & 2249/12 these are the applications seeking stay of the operation of recovery of the excess amount from the salary of the petitioners, pursuant to the impugned order, during the pendency of this writ petition. for the reasons stated in the applications, there shall be no recovery from the petitioners, during the pendency of the writ petition, pursuant to the impugned order, till further order. accordingly, i.a. nos. 1629/12 & 2249/12 stand disposed of. i.a. no. 801 of 2012 mr. s.n. prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this interlocutory application. dismissed as not pressed. (alok singh, j.) r.k.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1688 of 2011 Ranjib Narayan Sinha and ors. ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH For the Petitioners : Mr. S.N. Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ashok Kumar, J.C. to G.P.-III ----- 3 /19.12.2012 I.A. No. 2004 of 2011 By way of present interlocutory application, petitioners seek amendment in the writ petition. Amendment, as sought for by the petitioners, seems to be justified for the fair adjudication of the case. For the reasons stated in the interlocutory application, I.A. No.2004 of 2011 is allowed. I.A. Nos. 1629/12 & 2249/12 These are the applications seeking stay of the operation of recovery of the excess amount from the salary of the petitioners, pursuant to the impugned order, during the pendency of this writ petition. For the reasons stated in the applications, there shall be no recovery from the petitioners, during the pendency of the writ petition, pursuant to the impugned order, till further order. Accordingly, I.A. Nos. 1629/12 & 2249/12 stand disposed of. I.A. No. 801 of 2012 Mr. S.N. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this interlocutory application. Dismissed as not pressed. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K.

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2012 Same Parties Ranjib Narayan Sinha and ors vs State of Jharkhand and ors Same Subject Education