Jharkhand Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pankaj Kumar and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.2537 of 2012 with Cr.M.P.No.2538 of 2012 Pankaj Kumar and others.....Petitioners (Cr.M.P.No.2537 of 2012) M/s. Koderma Gas Agency.... Petitioner (Cr.M.P.No.2538of 2012) VERSUS State of Jharkhand ...................... ........................Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners:Mr. H.K.Shikarwar For the State : Mr.S.S.Sahay, A.P.P 3.19.12.12. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the District Supply Officer, Koderma, who upon making search and seizure of the LPG Cylinders and other documents of Koderma Gas Agency has lodged a case and also put the office of the agency and go-down under lock has no authority to make search and seizure to secure due compliance of the provision of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (Regulation of Supply and Distribution) Order, 2000 and thereby any case based on such search and seizure is fit to be quashed and that since the office and go-down of the Koderma G...
Saydan Kandulna Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 5578 of 2009 Saydan Kandulna ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Arbind Kumar, J.C. to G.P.-II ----- 5 /19.12.2012 Let notice be issued to the Respondent Nos.5 & 6 by registered post with A/D in addition to normal mode of service on steps being taken by the petitioner on or before 5th January, 2013. Counter affidavit on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 4 has already been filed. Let counter affidavit, on behalf of Respondent Nos.5 & 6, be filed within next six weeks. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within four weeks thereafter. I.A. No. 316 of 2010 Any appointment made during the pendency of this writ petition, pursuant to the Advertisement dated 01.01.2010 shall be subject to the final outcome of this writ petition. I.A. No. 316 of 2010 stands disposed of accordingly. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K....
Ramesh Sahu Alias Ramesh Kumar Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3721 of 2012 ---- Ramesh Sahu @ Ramesh Kumar Sahu .... Petitioner ---Versus--- The State of Jharkhand . ............. .........Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ---- 3 / 19.12.2012 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The petitioner is accused in this case registered under Sections 307 and 353 of the I.P.C. read with Sections 25(1-B)a/ 26/27/35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act, in connection with Khunti P.S. Case No.66 of 2012, pending in the court of A.C.J.M., Khunti. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is named in the F.I.R. and his name has come on the statement of the co-accused namely Sukra @ Gujjar. He has further contended that the only material has come against him that he used to collect the levy from the other contractors and supports P.L.F. Members and also gives informa...
Kastu Oraon Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.2063of2010 KastuOraon ... Petitioner Versus CentralCoalfieldsLtd.throughitsChairmancum ManagingDirector,Ranchi&Ors. ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.NandKishorePrasadSinha,Advocate FortheRespondents :M/sAnandaSen,RanjanKumar,Advocates FortheRespondentNo.7:Mr.DeepakRoshan,Advocate I.A.No.1496of2012 07/19.12.2012 Thisisanapplicationseekingamendmentinthewritpetition. Forthereasonsstatedintheapplication,amendmentsoughtseemsto bejustandproperforfairadjudicationofthecase. Consequently,I.A.No.1496of2012isallowed. W.P.(S)No.2063of2010 Let amended writ petition be placed on record on or before 10th of January, 2013 with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the respondents. Letcounteraffidavittotheamendedwritpetitionbefiledwithinnext fourweeks. Rejoinderaffidavit,ifany,maybefiledwithinfourweeksthereafter. (AlokSingh,J.) Manish...
Lilwa Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8685 of 2012 Lilwa Devi ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Tarun Kumar Sinha For the State :A. P.P. ----- 03/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No. 33 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 673 of 2012. From the F.I.R., it appears that the marriage of the deceased had taken place about 12 years ago and it is alleged that due to the torture by the in-laws, the deceased had committed suicide. Petitioner is the mother-in-law of the deceased. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Lilwa Devi is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) wi...
Dinesh Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. Appeal Case (S.B.) No. 4 of 2012 Dinesh Mahto Appellant -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Others Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT. For the Appellant : - Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent-State : - Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, Advocate. 08/19.12.2012 The present appeal is filed under Section 15 of the Jharkhand Educational Tribunal Act, being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 25.06.2011, passed by the Jharkhand Educational Tribunal in Misc. Case No. 50 of 2005. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the appellant and on perusal of the papers, issue urgent notice to the Respondent no. 5 both by Registered Post with A/D as well as by ordinary process for which requisites etc. must be filed within two days. Notice is made returnable by 23rd January, 2013. Put up this case on 23rd January, 2013. So far as the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 are concerned, they are represented by the learned counsel appea...
Kameshwar Prasad Roy Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3154 of 2010 Kameshwar Prasad Roy ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhanu Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. J.S. Tiwary, J.C. to S.C.-I ----- 6 /19.12.2012 I.A. No. 3759 of 2010 Mr. Bhanu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application, with liberty to file fresh writ petition challenging the order. Dismissed as withdrawn. W.P.(S) No. 3154 of 2010 Mr. Bhanu Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the subsequent order of dismissal, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to file fresh, challenging the order of dismissal as well. Present writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K....
Majhar Ali Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8781 of 2012 --- Majhar Ali ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : M/s. Md. Ashgar, R.R. Ravi Das For the Opposite Party : Mr. V.K. Tiwary, A.P.P. --- 04/19.12.2012 Present Bail application is moved seeking regular bail in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No.137 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.3383 of 2012 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 302 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no injury is attributed to the petitioner and the petitioner is not shown, having any arm, in his hands. He further submits that the only allegation against the petitioner is that he was driving the car, in which, other co-accused have reached on the spot. Since, no weapon was recovered from the petitioner and no injury is attributed to the petitioner, I direct let petitioner be released on bail on furnishing p...
Birendra Minj and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.3709of2004 With W.P.(S)No.3819of2004 ShaguftaBegumandanother...Petitioners(InW.P.(S)No.3709of2004) BirendraMinjandanother...Petitioners(InW.P.(S)No.3819of2004) Versus TheStateofJharkhand&others ......Respondents CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioners : FortheRespondentsJPSC :Mr.SanjayPiprawal,Adv. 09/19.12.2012 Nooneappearsonbehalfofthepetitioners. Itappearsthaton the last several dates the cases have been adjourned as no one had appearedonbehalfofthepetitioners. LearnedcounselfortheJ.P.S.C,Mr.SanjayPiprawalinformsthat the issues raised in the present writ applications, were also subject matterofconsiderationinanothercasepreferredbyanotheraggrieved person,inwhichthematterwentuptotheHon'bleSupremeCourtof IndiaandhasbeenfinallydecidedinfavouroftheRespondentsState. He points out that the petitioners had themselves relied upon the DivisionBenchJudgmentofthisCourt,whichwasreportedin(2006)2 JLJR447. However,itwouldappearfromtheor...
Manoj Kumar and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2500 of 2010 Manoj Kumar and ors. ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH For the Petitioners : Mr. Saurav Arun, Advocate For the Respondents : ----- 5 /19.12.2012 I.A. No. 1935 of 2011 Mr. Saurav Arun does not want to press this interlocutory application. Dismissed as not pressed. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »