Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Birendra Minj and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Birendra Minj and ors. vs State of Jharkhand and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Dec 19, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972339

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Birendra Minj and ors.

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and ors.

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi w.p.(s)no.3709of2004 with w.p.(s)no.3819of2004 shaguftabegumandanother...petitioners(inw.p.(s)no.3709of2004) birendraminjandanother...petitioners(inw.p.(s)no.3819of2004) versus thestateofjharkhand&others ......respondents coram:honblemr.justiceapareshkumarsingh forthepetitioners : fortherespondents jpsc :mr.sanjaypiprawal,adv. 09/19.12.2012 nooneappearsonbehalfofthepetitioners. itappearsthaton the last several dates the cases have been adjourned as no one had appearedonbehalfofthepetitioners. learnedcounselforthej.p.s.c,mr.sanjaypiprawalinformsthat the issues raised in the present writ applications, were also subject matterofconsiderationinanothercasepreferredbyanotheraggrieved person,inwhichthematterwentuptothehon'blesupremecourtof indiaandhasbeenfinallydecidedinfavouroftherespondentsstate. he points out that the petitioners had themselves relied upon the divisionbenchjudgmentofthiscourt,whichwasreportedin(2006)2 jljr447. however,itwouldappearfromtheorderdated17thaugust, 2006 as also subsequent order dated 8th february, 2010 that the judgmentofthedivisionbenchofthiscourtwasstayedbytheorderof hon'blesupremecourtofindiains.l.p.(c)no.8345/06.subsequently, thesaidspecialleavepetitionconvertedascivilappealnos.81188121 of2010(stateofjharkhand&ors.vs.ashokkumardangi&ors.),have been finally decided and the judgment of the division bench of this courthasbeensetaside.thepetitionershadplacedrelianceuponthe judgment of the division bench of this court, which has now been finallysetasideinviewofthejudgmentrenderedbyhon'blesupreme courtofindia. inthatviewofthematter,thepetitionersmayhavelostinterest inthematterandarenotinterestedinpursuingthecaseanyfurther. accordingly,thewritpetitionsaredismissed. (apareshkumarsingh,j) jk

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.3709of2004 With W.P.(S)No.3819of2004 ShaguftaBegumandanother...Petitioners(InW.P.(S)No.3709of2004) BirendraMinjandanother...Petitioners(InW.P.(S)No.3819of2004) Versus TheStateofJharkhand&others ......Respondents CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioners : FortheRespondents JPSC :Mr.SanjayPiprawal,Adv. 09/19.12.2012 Nooneappearsonbehalfofthepetitioners. Itappearsthaton the last several dates the cases have been adjourned as no one had appearedonbehalfofthepetitioners. LearnedcounselfortheJ.P.S.C,Mr.SanjayPiprawalinformsthat the issues raised in the present writ applications, were also subject matterofconsiderationinanothercasepreferredbyanotheraggrieved person,inwhichthematterwentuptotheHon'bleSupremeCourtof IndiaandhasbeenfinallydecidedinfavouroftheRespondentsState. He points out that the petitioners had themselves relied upon the DivisionBenchJudgmentofthisCourt,whichwasreportedin(2006)2 JLJR447. However,itwouldappearfromtheorderdated17thAugust, 2006 as also subsequent order dated 8th February, 2010 that the judgmentoftheDivisionBenchofthisCourtwasstayedbytheorderof Hon'bleSupremeCourtofIndiainS.L.P.(C)no.8345/06.Subsequently, thesaidSpecialLeavePetitionconvertedasCivilAppealNos.81188121 of2010(StateofJharkhand&Ors.Vs.AshokKumarDangi&Ors.),have been finally decided and the judgment of the Division Bench of this Courthasbeensetaside.Thepetitionershadplacedrelianceuponthe judgment of the Division Bench of this Court, which has now been finallysetasideinviewofthejudgmentrenderedbyHon'bleSupreme CourtofIndia. Inthatviewofthematter,thepetitionersmayhavelostinterest inthematterandarenotinterestedinpursuingthecaseanyfurther. Accordingly,thewritpetitionsaredismissed. (ApareshKumarSingh,J) jk

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial