Skip to content

Jharkhand Court December 2012 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 19 2012

Ms Sanjay Kumar Choubey and Company Vs. Road Construction

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 4258 of 2012 M/s Sanjay Kumar Choubey & Co. ......Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr.Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State : JC to AG. ----- 06/19.12.2012 AS prayed for, put up this case on 22.01.2013. Till then, the interim order dated 13.08.2012 shall continue. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...


Dec 19 2012

Hans Raj Kumar Alias Hansraj Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8617 of 2012 Hans Raj Kumar @ Hansraj Kumar ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Shailendra Jit For the State :A. P.P. ----- 03/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 385, 386, 387, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Patratu (Barkakana) P.S. Case No. 98 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 1496 of 2012. The F.I.R. was registered on the basis of the written report of the Police Officer stating therein that he had received information that one Sushil Srivastava, who was in jail, was engaged in demanding levy from the businessmen with the help of his associates, including the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only ...


Dec 19 2012

Manoj Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8784 of 2012 --- Manoj Singh ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arbind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sudhanshu Shekhar, A.P.P. --- 02 /19.12.2012 Present Bail application is moved seeking regular bail in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No.92 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.357 of 2012 registered under Sections 341, 323, 376, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per prosecution story, the husband of the prosecutrix was working at Delhi. The accused person, on the pretext of taking the prosecutrix to her husband, had allured her and developed physical relation with her, and thereafter, started blackmailing her after showing her naked photographs. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was no false promise of marrying with the prosecutrix. The prosecutrix, taking the benefit of the absence of ...


Dec 19 2012

Puran Manjhi Alias Puran Tudu Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8712 of 2012 Puran Manjhi @ Puran Tudu ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Atanu Banerjee For the State :A. P.P. ----- 03/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 313, 498A, 377/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Petarbar P.S. Case No. 96 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 952 of 2012. Though, there is omnibus allegation against the petitioner and the other co-accused persons to have subjected the victim lady to cruelty and torture, but it appears that the petitioner is the cousin brother-in-law of the victim lady and the offence under Sec. 377 of the IPC is specific against the husband of the victim lady. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitio...


Dec 19 2012

Manik Kumar Sinha Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3755 of 2012 Manik Kumar Sinha ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Sidhartha Roy, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 03/19.12.2012 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Sidhartha Roy, seeks permission to withdraw this application. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra...


Dec 19 2012

Rohtash Kumar and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9510 o1. Rohtash Kumar 2. Hari Narayan ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioners :Mr. Naresh Pd. Singh For the State :A. P.P. ----- 02/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioners have been made accused for the offence under Sections 461, 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Bariatu P.S. Case No. 104 of 2005, corresponding to G.R. No. 2072 of 2005. The case relates to theft in a post office. Though the petitioners were remanded in this case on 13.09.2012, but they are in custody since long after recovery of the stolen KVP/NSC at Delhi. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners Rohtash Kumar and Hari Narayan are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousa...


Dec 19 2012

Mukesh Pilley Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.3684of2012 MukeshPilley .... .... . Petitioner Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand 2.SonuKumari .... .... . OppositeParties CORAM :HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.BijayKumarSinha,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P. 05/19.12.2012 Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitionerisreadytotakehiswifewhoiscomplainantinthiscase with him with proper dignity, respect and love. He has further submittedthatthepetitionerhasfiledacaseunderSection9ofthe HinduMarriageActforrestitutionofconjugalrightandthesamehas beendecreedinfavourofthepetitioner.Itisalsosubmittedthatthe petitionerandhiswifehaveachildofsixyearsoldandheisresiding withhismotherwhoiscomplainantinthiscase. Considering all these aspects as there is chance of compromise,issuenoticetotheoppositepartyno.2intheadmission matter at her present and correct address by registered post with A/Daswellasbyordinaryprocess,forwhichrequisiteetc.mustbe filedby7th January,2013,failingwhichthisapplic...


Dec 19 2012

Sandip Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8569 of 2012 Sandip Mishra @ Sandeep Mishra ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Akshay Kr. Mahato For the State :A. P.P. ----- 06/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 364, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act read with Section 17 of the C.L. Act, in connection with Ghaghra P.S. Case No. 35 of 2007, corresponding to G.R. No. 373 of 2007 (S. T. No. 97 of 2008). The case relates to the abduction and murder of the son of the informant by unknown members of the extremists group and it also appears that the deceased had also criminal background. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only on the allegation against him that he is a member...


Dec 19 2012

Kumar Gaurav Mani Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3751 of 2012 Kumar Gaurav Mani ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Triapthy, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 03/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with the case registered under Sections 406, 408, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 132 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 686 of 2012, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the allegation made against the petitioner by one Hemant Kumar, but said letter in which the informant has alleged about him is not signed by the informant. He has further submitted that even if he has accepted or received the demand drafts it should come through business cod...


Dec 19 2012

Karu Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3397 of 2012 Karu Singh .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Mohit Prakash For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 19.12.2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in connection with Jagarnathpur PS case No. 92 of 2011 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi. It reveals from the written report that a sum of Rs. 85,000/- has been illegally transferred from the account of the informant. It is alleged that the informant operated his account through ATM Card and just thereafter, two boys entered the ATM counter. When these two boys came out from the counter, the informant checked his balance and found that Rs. 85,000/- (rupees eighty five thousand ) has been transferred to some other account from his ac...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial