Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rohtash Kumar and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Rohtash Kumar and anr vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Dec 19, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972271

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rohtash Kumar and anr

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no. 9510 o”1. rohtash kumar 2. hari narayan ..... petitioners versus the state of jharkhand . opposite party coram: honble mr. justice h. c. mishra for the petitioners :mr. naresh pd. singh for the state :a. p.p. ----- 02/19.12.2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned a.p.p. for the prosecution. petitioners have been made accused for the offence under sections 461, 379, 411 of the indian penal code, in connection with bariatu p.s. case no. 104 of 2005, corresponding to g.r. no. 2072 of 2005. the case relates to theft in a post office. though the petitioners were remanded in this case on 13.09.2012, but they are in custody since long after recovery of the stolen kvp/nsc at delhi. in the facts and circumstances of the case, i am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. accordingly, the petitioners rohtash kumar and hari narayan are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of sri rajeev ranjan, learned judicial magistrate, 1st class, ranchi, or his successor, in connection with bariatu p.s. case no. 104 of 2005, corresponding to g.r. no. 2072 of 2005. (h. c. mishra, j) umesh/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9510 o”

1. Rohtash Kumar 2. Hari Narayan ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioners :Mr. Naresh Pd. Singh For the State :A. P.P. ----- 02/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioners have been made accused for the offence under Sections 461, 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Bariatu P.S. Case No. 104 of 2005, corresponding to G.R. No. 2072 of 2005. The case relates to theft in a post office. Though the petitioners were remanded in this case on 13.09.2012, but they are in custody since long after recovery of the stolen KVP/NSC at Delhi. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners Rohtash Kumar and Hari Narayan are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Rajeev Ranjan, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi, or his successor, in connection with Bariatu P.S. Case No. 104 of 2005, corresponding to G.R. No. 2072 of 2005. (H. C. Mishra, J) Umesh/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial