Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manoj Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Manoj Singh vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Dec 19, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972377

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manoj Singh

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b. a. no. 8784 of 2012 --- manoj singh ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand opposite party --- coram : hon'ble mr. justice alok singh --- for the petitioner : mr. arbind kr. choudhary, advocate for the opposite party : mr. sudhanshu shekhar, a.p.p. --- 02 /19.12.2012 present bail application is moved seeking regular bail in connection with mohanpur p.s. case no.92 of 2012, corresponding to g.r. no.357 of 2012 registered under sections 341, 323, 376, 379, 504 and 34 of the indian penal code. as per prosecution story, the husband of the prosecutrix was working at delhi. the accused person, on the pretext of taking the prosecutrix to her husband, had allured her and developed physical relation with her, and thereafter, started blackmailing her after showing her naked photographs. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was no false promise of marrying with the prosecutrix. the prosecutrix, taking the benefit of the absence of her husband, had developed physical relationship with the accused, and therefore, the prosecutrix was the consenting party. therefore, no offence under section 376 of the indian penal code is made out. considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, i direct let petitioner be released on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties of rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the competent judicial magistrate, deoghar having jurisdiction over mohanpur police station in connection with mohanpur p.s. case no.92 of 2012, corresponding to g.r. no.357 of 2012. (alok singh, j.) r.k./ shanant

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8784 of 2012 --- Manoj Singh ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arbind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sudhanshu Shekhar, A.P.P. --- 02 /19.12.2012 Present Bail application is moved seeking regular bail in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No.92 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.357 of 2012 registered under Sections 341, 323, 376, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per prosecution story, the husband of the prosecutrix was working at Delhi. The accused person, on the pretext of taking the prosecutrix to her husband, had allured her and developed physical relation with her, and thereafter, started blackmailing her after showing her naked photographs. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was no false promise of marrying with the prosecutrix. The prosecutrix, taking the benefit of the absence of her husband, had developed physical relationship with the accused, and therefore, the prosecutrix was the consenting party. Therefore, no offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code is made out. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct let petitioner be released on bail on furnishing personal bond and two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the competent Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar having jurisdiction over Mohanpur police station in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No.92 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.357 of 2012. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K./ Shanant

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial