Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ariam Chatterjee vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5893/2026 ARIAM CHATTERJEE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shoaib Khan, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Tanvi Nigam Senior Panel Counsel for Union of India and H.C Jitendra Kumar Mishra from B.S.F.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 30.04.20261. Through this petition, the Petitioner challenges the correctnessof the order dated 05.03.2019, passed by the competent authority thereby terminating the services of the Petitioner. The Petitioner also challenges the order dated 22.01.2020 whereby the statutory representation filed by the Petitioner against termination of his services also came to be rejected.2. As is apparent from the record, the impugned orders pertain tothe years 2019 and 2020 whereas the present writ petition has been filed much later in April, 2026. Pertinently, if the Petitioner was to file a civil suit, the period of limitation wo...
Sabita Wari vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3340/2026 SABITA WARI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Gumeet Kaur Kapur, Advocate.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State. SI Pankaj, P.S. CR Par.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13545/2026 By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks condonation of about 16 days delay in re-filing the present petition.2. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the delay is condoned.3. The application is allowed and disposed-of. CRL.M.C. 3340/20264. By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the BNSS,the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 0124/2019 dated 16.08.2019 registered under section 289 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Chitranjan Park, South (Delhi). CRL.M.C. 3340/...
Mohit vs Competition Commission of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5926/2026 MOHIT .....Petitioner Through: Mr Nishant Datta and Mr Chirag Rathi, Mr Kunal sejwal, Advs.versusCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Soni Singh and Mr. Vedang Upadhayay, Advocates for R-1.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 30.04.20261. Since the order on the petitioners complaint has been reserved on 25.02.2026, therefore, cause raised in the instant petition stands mitigated.2. If after the pronouncement of the order, the petitioner has any grievance, he shall be at liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J APRIL 30, 2026/PThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 12:49:01...
Suresh vs the State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3275/2026, CRL.M.A. 13328/2026 SURESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dilip Kr. and Ms. Anuradha, Advs. with petitioner in personversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Adv. with SI Kuldeep Lamba, PS: Amar Colony Mr. Pawan Kumar and Mr. Ashish Kr. Siwas, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 30.04.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 596/2016 dated 25.09.2016 registered at PS: Amar Colony, Delhi for offence under Sections 354/506/509 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom in view of fresh Memorandum of Understanding dated 17.04.2026, [Annexure L] arrived at between the petitioner and the respondent no.2, which is accompanied by their respective proofs ...
Shikhar Baisoya and Ors vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3333/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13517/2026 SHIKHAR BAISOYA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Jagdish Trivedi, Advocate (through video conferencing)versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with SI Yogesh.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.04.20261. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.0002/2026 of PS Defence Colony for offence under Section 115(2)/126(2)/3(5) BNS on merits.2. After addressing partly, learned counsel for petitioners, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this petition.3. As requested, the petition and accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J APRIL 30, 2026/ryThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 11:43:42...
Ritu Gupta vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1669/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13445/2026 RITU GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Gupta and Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Advocates.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Tilak Raj, PS IFSO/Dwarka.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.04.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 152/2025 of Police Station Special Cell Dwarka (IFSO) for offence under Section 308/318(4)/319 of BNS.2. By way of detailed judgment dated 16.03.2026, bail application of the accused/applicant was dismissed on merits.3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that after 16.03.2026,circumstances have changed as now chargesheet has been filed. In view of this position, learned counsel for accused/applicant seeks permission to withdraw this bail application with liberty to file afresh before the learned trial court.4. As requested, the bail application and the acc...
Brightex Enterprises Pvt Ltd vs Niki Infotech Private Limited and Ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3329/2026 BRIGHTEX ENTERPRISES PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. R Gayathri Manasa, Advocate (through VC)versusNIKI INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 30.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13504/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3329/20263. By way of the present petition, the petitioner is seeking expeditioustrial and disposal of the complaint case bearing no. CC NI Act 3885/2022, titled as Brightex Enterprises Private Limited vs. Niki Infotech Private Limited, pending before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Court, New Delhi.4. The learned counsel who appears on behalf of the petitioner, through video-conferencing, states that the matter is pending before the learned Trial Court for the last four years and the respondent is unnecessarily delaying the tri...
Mrs Eunice Lalnunmawii Chawngthu vs Union Ministry of Home Through Jt. ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1416/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13597/2026 MRS EUNICE LALNUNMAWII CHAWNGTHU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh Malik and Mr. Puneet Jain, Advocates with petitioner in- person.versusUNION MINISTRY OF HOME THROUGH JT. SECRETARY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Neeraj Dubey, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.04.2026 On a perusal of the petition it is evident that the grievances of the petitioner arise from omissions on the part of the police and other authorities in district Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. In view thereof, this court is of the view that it does not have territorial jurisdiction over the matter. The petition is accordingly disposed-of, granting to the petitioner liberty to approach the authorities with competent territorial jurisdiction, as may be permissible, in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed-of in the above terms. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.A...
Wings Enterprises Prop Manish Kumar vs Commissioner of Central Goods a ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5947/2026 & CM APPL. 29201/2026 WINGS ENTERPRISES PROP MANISH KUMAR ....Petitioner Through: Mr. rajesh Mahna, Mr. Ramanand Roy and Mr. Mayank Kouts, Advs.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 30.04.20261. There is a statutory alternate remedy of appeal available to the petitioner.2. We see no reason as to why we should exercise the extraordinaryjurisdiction in the present petition, particularly when the Show Cause Notice refers to the specific provision which empowers the respondents to deal with the issue as regards retrospective cancellation of registration.3. Apart from above, the revocation of cancellation of registration is also dealt with through a speaking order.4. That being so, we dismiss the petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to...
May and Baker Pharmaceuticals Limited vs Satya Paul (Sole Proprietor o ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + FAO 137/2026 MAY AND BAKER PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Dr. Ishaan S. Sharma, Ms. Shambavi Sharma, Mr. Ayush, Mr. Mukun Ranjan and Mr. Shubham Shukla, AdvocatesversusSATYA PAUL (SOLE PROPRIETOR OF RUNOS HEALTHCARE) .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 30.04.2026 CM APPL. 29233/20261. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications are disposed of. FAO 137/20261. By way of the present appeal, the appellant seeks to assail the orderdated 16.03.2026, whereby the application filed by the appellant underOrder IX Rule 9 CPC came to be dismissed.2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the suit, upon beinginstituted, was first listed before the Trial Court on 04.06.2025, when the learned Presiding Officer was on leave. The matter was thereafter listed on 19.07.2025, when the Trial Court granted an opportunity to cure defects andthe matter was adjourned to 18.09...