Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Aspect Technology Through Its Proprietor Lalit vs Punjab National ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5571/2026&CM APPL. 27138/2026 M/S ASPECT TECHNOLOGY THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR LALIT .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Neha, Mr. Amit Singh Ms. Simran Khokhar AdvocatesversusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. R K Chauhan Mr Vineet Chauhan Mr Shubham Ranakoti, Advs. for R2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.04.20261. Ms. Neha, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks to withdraw thepresent writ petition.2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.JASMEET SINGH, J APRIL 30, 2026 / (MS)This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 13:20:14...
Shigan Quantum Technologies Ltd vs Westport Fuel Systems Italia S.R.L.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 183/2026 & I.A. 11736/2026 SHIGAN QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kuljeet Rawal and Mr. Aditya Joshi, AdvocatesversusWESTPORT FUEL SYSTEMS ITALIA S.R.L. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Arunav Guha Roy, Ms. Anandita Rana, Mr. Priyanshu Jain, and Ms. Sakshi Dutta, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 30.04.20261. The instant petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & ConciliationAct, 1996 has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayers:- a) Restrain respondent by itself and through its affiliates, assignees, principal, or any person, persons, company, partnership, corporation, agents to either directly or indirectly, be alone or collectively or in conjunction with any one as above, to either solicit or deal or supply or manufacture or share technology, design etc & or sell to Tata Motor Ltd for...
Shri Sumit Kumar vs Supreme Court of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5650/2026, CM APPL. 27717/2026, CM APPL. 27718/2026 SHRI SUMIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satya Narayan, Ms. Babita Panigrahy, Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Ms. Jeet Gautam, Mr. Kunal, Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advs. with Petitioner in-person.versusSUPREME COURT OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shashank Bajpai, CGSC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsel representing the Respondent submits that thetender issued on 16.03.2026 has been scrapped, as no valid bids were received.2. At this stage, learned counsel representing the Petitioner seeksand is granted permission to withdraw the present Petition.3. The Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Thepending applications also stand closed.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.APRIL 30, 2026 jai/palThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from D...
Vikasdeep Sharma (Adv.) vs Navrattan & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 445/2026, CM APPL. 29178/2026 (delay), CM APPL. VIKASDEEP SHARMA (ADV.) .....Appellant Through: Mr. Pawan Kumar Jakhu, Advocate.versusNAVRATTAN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 30.04.2026 CM APPL. 29180/2026 (Exemption)1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The Application stands disposed of. RFA 445/20263. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Section 151 of theCode of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as CPC) has been filed on behalf of the Appellant against the Order dated 19.08.2025 whereby the Suit of the Plaintiff/Appellant for Damages and compensation of Rs.13,00,000/- for defamation and tarnishing of reputation, has been rejected on the ground of limitation under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.4. The learned Senior Counsel, after some submissions, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present Appeal with liberty to pur...
Arvind Kumar vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5903/2026 & CM APPL. 28957/2026 ARVIND KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mathur and Mr. Chiranjeev Johri, Advocates.versusNEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Saurabh Seth, Mr. Ravi Krishan Chandna, Mr. Udbhav K. Garg and Mr. Siddhant Choudhary, Advocates for NDMC. Ms. Avni Singh and Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocates for GNCTD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.04.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of thedemand notice dated 16th October, 2023 issued by the respondent no.1/NDMC in respect of property bearing No. B-309, Statesman House, New Delhi (Property ID P- 13175) (hereinafter the subject property).2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that property tax on the subject property cannot be levied as the property is freehold.3. There is nothing in the NDMC Act, 1994, to indicate that freehold properties are not subjec...
Union of India and Ors vs Gyan Dutt Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5795/2026 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Niyati Sharma, SPC.versusGYAN DUTT SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Mr. A.K Trivedi and Mr. Yogesh Sharma, Advocates. Mr. Amit Anand and Mr. Sunil Bansal, Advocates with respondent in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER (ORAL)% 30.04.2026 C. HARI SHANKAR J.1. This writ petition is directed against order dated 1 July 2025passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal1 in OA 1089/2022, which sought antedating of the seniority of the respondent as Store Keeping Staff in the Army Ordinance Store.2. Before the Tribunal, the respondent contended that the case wasfully covered by the judgment dated 31 May 2025 passed by the Tribunal in OA 1987/20192, which was never challenged and was also implemented.1 Tribunal hereafter 2 Rama Nand Prabhakar & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. Signed By:ANUB...
Sh. Ritesh Kumar Tripathi & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~63, 77 & 78* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 30th April, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 3320/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13484/2026 JEEVAN TAXAK @ JEEVAN TOKAS & ANR. .....Petitioners + CRL.M.C. 3354/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13577/2026 JEEVAN TAXAK@ JEEVAN TOKAS & ANR. .....Petitioners + CRL.M.C. 3356/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13590/2026 SH. RITESH KUMAR TRIPATHI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kanu Agrawal with Ms. Aishwarya Srivastava,Signature Not Verified CRL.M.C. 3320/2026, CRL.M.C. 3354/2026 1 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Mr. Pramod Kumar with Mr. Nadeem Rahmani, Ms. Siman Aggarwal, Advocates for respondent Nos.2 and 3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. All these matters, being connected, have been taken up together.2. The parties are residing in the same neighbourhood, and on 31.03.2024,there was some scuffle and altercation, particularly, between the children of the parties on some trivial issues. The matte...
Chandrakala & Anr. vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5930/2026 & CM APPL. 29126/2026 CHANDRAKALA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Adarsh Kr. Gupta, Mr. Keshav Mann, Mr. Vishal Gupta and Mr. Rajat Sharma, Advocates.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi and Ms. Minu Kumari, Advocates for GNCTD. Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, SC with Mr. Aditya Verma, Advocates for DDA. Ms. Kannopriya Gupta, Advocate for R-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 30.04.20261. Issue notice. Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi, counsel, accepts notice on behalf of Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi.1 Mr. Aditya Verma, counsel, accepts notice on behalf of Delhi Development Authority.22. The Petitioners claim to be the owner of land RZ-345/17, Khasra Nos. He seeks a direction upon the Respondents to carry out demarcation of the GNCTD DDA subject land.3. However, in view of the fact that the village in question has beenurbanised by notification ...
Baleshwar Sharma vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Centrl Circle-0 ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5921/2026 CM APPL. 29077/2026 CM APPL. 29078/2026 BALESHWAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Malik and Mr. Tushar Jarwal, Advs.versusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-07 .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia SSC with Mr. Anant Mann and Mr. P. Gupta, JSCs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 30.04.20261. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged theassessment order dated 31.03.2026 passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1961), whereby the respondent no.1 has raised a demand against the petitioner essentially based on a slip (Kachchi Parchi) recovered from one Mr. Pradeep Kumar Sehgal in which a sum of Rs.10,000/- (-10,000/-)was written.2. Learned counsel contended that only on the basis of such slip, which does not even correctly record the petitioners name, the Assessing...
Indian Ex Bordermen Movement and Ors. vs Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 09.02.2026Judgment delivered on: 30.04.2026Judgment uploaded on: As per Digital Signature~+ W.P.(C) 3761/2019 INDIAN EX BORDERMEN MOVEMENT AND ORS. ....PetitionersversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the petitioners : Mr. A K Trivedi, AdvocateFor the Respondents : Mr. Ashish K. Dixit, CGSC with Mr. Umar Uashmi, Ms. Iqra Sheikh, Ms. Namita, Advs. with Insp. Abhishek Kumar Singh, Officer from BSFCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAJUDGMENTV. KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-(a) Declare the whole action of the respondents as illegal, unjust, arbitrary and discriminatory in not fixing the pension of the members/pensioners of the petitioner's Association i.e. Constables, Sub- Inspectors and Inspectors wef 1.1.2006 in terms of OM dated 28/01/2013 & 04/01/2019...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »