Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Baldev Singh Sobti & Ors. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6132/2025, CM APPL. 27931/2025 & CM APPL. S. BALDEV SINGH SOBTI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Navdeep Singh, Advocate.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikash Chopra, Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Ms. Anita R. Mishra and Ms. Khushi, Advocates for MCD. Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate for R-2 (through VC) Mr. Shivam Midha, R-2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.04.20261. In the status report filed on behalf of respondent no.1/MCD on 28thAugust, 2025, it was stated that a demolition order was passed in respect of construction on the subject property on 1st March, 2023. A sealing order was passed on 14th March, 2023, and the subject property was sealed on 14th May, 2025 and 2nd June, 2025.2. It is also stated that an appeal has been filed by respondent no.2against the sealing order before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD (ATMCD). The said appeal is stated to be pend...
Fmc Corpotation and Ors. vs Natco Pharma Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 409/2024 FMC CORPORATION AND ORS. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. George Vithayathil and Ms. Ahaana Singh Rana, Advocates.versusNATCO PHARMA LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sidhant Goel, Mr. Aditya Goel, Mr. Deepankar Mishra, Mr. Kartikeya Tandon and Mr. Avinash Kumar Sharma, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 30.04.2026 I.A. 12217/20261. This application is filed jointly on behalf of Plaintiffs and the Defendant under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with 151 CPC for recordal of settlement between the parties.2. The suit was instituted by the Plaintiffs seeking permanent injunctionrestraining the Defendant and all others acting on its behalf from infringing the patent rights of Plaintiff No. 1 and Plaintiff No. 2 under Indian Patent No. 298645 by using directly or indirectly the compound of Formula 3 as claimed in claim 12 of the suit patent IN 298645 for manufacturing t...
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. vs Bhavana R Vira Alias Bhavana Rajesh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 30.04.2026 + ARB.P. 948/2024 & I.A. 32488/2024 (Ex. From filing original copies of annexures) INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate.versusBHAVANA R VIRA ALIAS BHAVANA RAJESH VIRA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)1. The present Petition, under Section 11 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 19961 seeks the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for the purpose of adjudication of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Loan Agreement dated 08.05.20182.2. The Agreement contemplates adjudication of disputes, arising thereof, by way of Arbitration. The relevant stipulation is contained in Article 12 of the Agreement3, which reads as follows:ARTICLE 12: ARBITRATION 12.1 This Loan Documents is/shall be governed by Indian laws and the courts at New Delhi shall have exclusive jurisdiction rel...
Ramesh @ Ramesh Kumar Shokeen vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~59 to 61* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHICRL.REV.P. 844/2024 + CRL.REV.P. 856/2024 CRL.REV.P. 859/2024CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 30.04.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent no.2respectively submit that they have inter se settled their dispute vide Settlement Agreement dated 21.04.2026, and that they shall remain bound with all the terms, including the amounts stipulated therein.2. They further submit that they shall be taking appropriate steps for release thereof in accordance with law before this Court.3. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petitions.4. Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.5. It is clarified that the said amount so deposited with this Court shall be released in accordance with the terms set out in the aforesaid settlement as per law, and upon them taking the requisite steps therefor.6. A copy of this order be kept in all the connec...
Lalitesh @ Laxmi vs Kapil Sehrawat
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 181/2025 LALITESH @ LAXMI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kanishka Singh, Adv.versusKAPIL SEHRAWAT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar M., Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 30.04.2026 CM APPL. 29040/2026 (for withdrawal)1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the appellantunder Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking disposal of the present appeal in terms of the settlement agreement dated 10.03.2026 arrived at between the parties.2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the disputes between the parties have been amicably resolved in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 10.03.20263. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the abovesaid request.4. Accordingly, the present appeal, being MAT.APP.(F.C.) terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 10.03.2026. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J APRIL 30, 2026...
Samunder Singh vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~J-102* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 115/2019 SAMUNDER SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr.L.B. Rai, Mr.Kartik Rai, Mr.Vineesh Tyagi, Mr.Satvik Rai, Mr.Ayush Pandita, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Mr.D.S. Lakra, Mr.Akash Parashar and Mr.Mohan Lal, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. Jitender Kumar Singh, Ms. Shivpriya, Ms. Anjali, Ms. Harshita Singh Advocates for respondent no. 2 Mr. Tarun Johri and Mr. Ankur Gupta, Advocates for DMRCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 227/2017 titled Jai Kishan Gupta Vs. Union Of India & Ors. and LA.APP. 158/2017 titled M/s Relaxo Footwears Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026/naSignature Not Verified ...
Asha Mohan & Anr. vs Siddhartha Mohan
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4307/2024 & CRL.M.A. 16346/2024 ASHA MOHAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S.C. Sagar, Mr. Naeem Ahmed, Mr. Shishu Pal Sharma and Ms. Swati, AdvocatesversusSIDDHARTHA MOHAN .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 30.04.20261. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.2. Accordingly, the present petition, along with pending application, stands dismissed as withdrawn.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J APRIL 30, 2026/zp/rThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 12:09:57...
Mrs Parminder Rekhi vs Mr Amanjit Singh Ahluwalia & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 481/2021 and I.A. 13193/2021 MRS PARMINDER REKHI .....Plaintiff Through:versusMR AMANJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Sahil Vij and Ms. Neekita, Advocate for D1 with defendant no.1 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 30.04.20261. None appears on behalf of the plaintiff when the matter is called out.2. Perusal of the order sheets dated 10.09.2025, 06.01.2026, 19.02.2026 and 13.04.2026 shows that there has been no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff.3. In view of the above, suit along with pending application, is dismissed in default. VIKAS MAHAJAN, J APRIL 30, 2026/jgThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/05/2026 at 12:05:14...
Bhoomi Rachhoya vs Hemlata and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7167/2025 BHOOMI RACHHOYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gurpreet Singh, AdvocateversusHEMLATA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shahid Azad and Mr. Shoaib Alam, Advocates Ms. Manisha Agarwal Narain, CGSC with Mr. Nipun Jain, Advocate Ms. Rachita Garg, Advocate for GNCTDCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 30.04.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:2. The aforesaid reliefs have been claimed in relation to the election heldfor the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) in 2022 in respect of a seat that was reserved for Scheduled Caste (women).3. It is contention of the petitioner that respondent no.1 had contested the aforesaid election by producing a forged caste certificate and respondent W.P.(C) 7167/2025 Page 1 of 2 no.1 won the aforesaid election.4. Clearly the relief sought in prayer (a) cannot be granted in favour of the petitioner in the present writ petition. T...
Pishori Lal Mahajan vs Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
$~J-16* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 16.12.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ LA.APP. 105/2017 PISHORI LAL MAHAJAN .....Appellant Through: Mr.L.B. Rai, Mr.Kartik Rai, Mr.Vineesh Tyagi, Mr.Satvik Rai, Mr.Ayush Pandita, Mr.Rohit Kumar, Mr.D.S. Lakra, Mr.Akash Parashar and Mr.Mohan Lal, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar Mr. Tarun Johri and Mr. Ankur Gupta, Advocates for DMRCCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTFor detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 47/2017 titled Naveen Kumar Jain Vs. Union Of India & Ors. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026 naSignature Not Verified Signature Not VerifiedDigitally Signed Digitally Signed By:MANOJBy:NIJAMUDDEEN ANSARI ...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »