Delhi Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gurdhyan Bhola and Anr vs the State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 39/2018 and CM APPL. 3853/2018 (delay) GURDHYAN BHOLA AND ANR .....Appellants Through: NoneversusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS .....Respondents Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 09.03.20261. None for the appellants. Even on the last two dates of hearing i.e., 22.04.2025 and 03.11.2025, the appellants have remained unrepresented.2. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed in default for non-prosecution alongwith the pending application. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J MARCH 9, 2026 naThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:27:46...
Rites Ltd vs Commissioner of Income Tax,Ltu,Delhi New Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1989/2011 RITES LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Artatrana Panda & Ms. Gargi Sethee, Advs.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LTU, DELHI NEW DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC with Ms. Easha Gurung, JSC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 09.03.20261. In view of the notification no.64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026,the matters listed on 07.03.2026 were directed to be listed today i.e., 09.03.2026.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition has beenrendered infructuous.3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.DINESH MEHTA, J.VINOD KUMAR, J.MARCH 9, 2026/srThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2026 at 13:42:18...
Inspector Harish Kumar & Ors. vs State & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 393/2019 INSPECTOR HARISH KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Deeksha Khandelwal, Adv. (through VC) with Petitioner no.1 present in personversusSTATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocate with SI Arvind, PS.: GokalpuriCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 08.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 10521/2026 (For restoration of petition)1. By virtue of the present application the applicants/ petitioners seekrestoration of the present petition.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks towithdraw the present application.3. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, J APRIL 8, 2026/bhThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded fro...
Rahul Agarwal vs Gaurav Aggarwal
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 278/2023 RAHUL AGARWAL .....Plaintiff Through: Mr Mayank Aggarwal & Mr. Pradeep Kumar Aggarwal, Advocates.versusGAURAV AGGARWAL .....Defendant Through: Mr. Ajay Garg, Mr. Uday Garg, Ms. Anusha Garg, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 09.03.2026 I.A. 5726/20261. The present Application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section151 of the CPC has been jointly filed by the Plaintiff and the Defendant for recording the settlement arrived between the parties in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 23.02.2026.2. The present Suit is one for Partition and Possession of the SuitProperty, being House No. D-9, Satyawati Colony, Ashok Vihar, Delhi- 110052.3. During the pendency of the Suit, the Plaintiff and the Defendant, whoare brothers, have decided to settle the disputes vide Settlement Agreement dated 23.02.2026. The Settlement Agreement has been filed along with the present Ap...
Mubeen Azad Saifi vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1370/2025 MUBEEN AZAD SAIFI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M. L. Yadav, Mr. Piyush Saini, Mr. Harish Chandra and Mr. Anant Chittolia, AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 09.03.20261. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant does not want to press the present bail application, at this stage and seeks permission to withdraw the same with liberty to file afresh.2. Accordingly, the present bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MARCH 09, 2026/ns/APThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2026 at 12:43:44...
Pankaj vs State (Govt of Nct Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1403/2025 & CRL.M.A. 37000/2025 PANKAJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pushkar Aryal, Ms. Toshi Sharma and Mr. Shoyab Malik, Advocates.versusSTATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with Inspector Amit Kumar, WSI Sanju and WSI Neeraj. Ms. Anushkaa Arora, DHCLSC Advocate for prosecutrix.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 09.03.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 563/2024 of PS Palam Village for offence under Section 376/323/506 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.2. In furtherance of last order, learned APP has produced before me theprintouts of pictures retrieved from Vivo mobile phone, which according to the accused/applicant belongs to his sister, but according to prosecution, it belongs to the accused/applicant.3. In view of the said pictures, learned counsel for accused/applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this app...
Amit Jain vs Harvinder Kaur
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 314/2011 AMIT JAIN .....Plaintiff Through: None.versusHARVINDER KAUR .....Defendant Through: Mr. Yash Anand, Adv. (through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 09.03.20261. On 02.02.2026, following order was passed: I.A. 7123/20251. As per office report, the plaintiff has been served for the matter being fixed today.2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has got no instructions to enable to pursue the matter and seeks permission to withdraw the vakaltnama.3. For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed.4. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is allowed to withdraw the vakaltnama. CS(OS) 314/20114. None for the plaintiff despite service.5. In the interests of justice, put up on 09.03.2026.2. Today, the plaintiff is unrepresented in spite of a passover.3. The suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J MARCH 9, 2026 haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the ...
Centex International Pvt. Ltd. vs Ministry of Textiles & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6741/2021 and CM APPL. 21256/2021 CENTEX INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: None.versusMINISTRY OF TEXTILES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC, Mr. Kushagra Kumar and Mr. Amit Kumar Rana Advocates.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 09.03.20261. None appears for the petitioner despite the matter having been called out in second round. None had appeared for the petitioner on 28.07.2025 and 28.10.2025 as well.2. Accordingly, the petition, along with pending application, stands dismissed for want of prosecution. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MARCH 9, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:43:23...
Suhail vs State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1718/2025 & CRL.M.A. 13758/2025 SUHAIL .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSTATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SHO Satvinder Rana and SI Anil. Ms. Surbhi Arora, Advocate for complainant. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 706/2017 of PS Seemapuri for offence under Section 302/392/397/34 IPC and Section2. None appears on behalf of accused/applicant. However, I have examined the record and heard learned prosecutor.3. Broadly speaking, the allegation according to prosecution is that threeBAIL APPLN. 1718/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages Signature Not Verified GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, KATHPALIA serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, Digitally Signed cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.03.09 1...
Radhey Lal Gupta & Ors. vs Galaxy Healthcare & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2026
$~35 & 36* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 09.03.2026 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 155/2025 & I.A. 5590/2026 (recalling of orders) RADHEY LAL GUPTA & ORS. .....Petitioners + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 156/2025 & I.A. 11207/2025 (Ex. From filing original and colour copies of the documents and pleading) RADHEY LAL GUPTA .....Petitioner Signing Date:11.03.2026 O.M.P. (I) (COMM.) 155/2025 & connected matter Page 1 of 3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)1. The Petitions being O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 155/2025 andO.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 156/2025 [present Petitions] have been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [Act] read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking interim measures, inter alia, to deposit the the due amounts and directions to prevent alienation and preservation of movabale and immovable properties of the Respondents, before the invocation of Arbitration proceedings....
- ‹ Prev
- 366
- 367
- 368
- 369
- 370
- 372
- 373
- 374
- 375
- 376
- Next ›
- Last »