Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Inspector Harish Kumar & Ors. vs State & Anr.

Inspector Harish Kumar & Ors. vs State & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Mar 09, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1262680

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.REV.P./393/2019
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Inspector Harish Kumar & Ors.

Advocate Ms. Deeksha Khandelwal

Respondent

State & Anr.

Advocate Mr. Raghuinder Verma, Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ crl.rev.p. 393/2019 inspector harish kumar & ors. .....petitioners through: ms. deeksha khandelwal, adv. (through vc) with petitioner no.1 present in personversusstate & anr. .....respondents through: mr. raghuinder verma, app for the state with mr. aditya vikram singh, advocate with si arvind, ps.: gokalpuricoram:hon'ble mr. justice saurabh banerjeeorder% 08.04.2026 crl.m.a. 10521/2026 (for restoration of petition)1. by virtue of the present application the applicants/ petitioners seekrestoration of the present petition.2. after some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks towithdraw the present application.3. accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn.saurabh banerjee, j april 8, 2026/bhthis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 10/04/2026 at 12:01:50

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.REV.P. 393/2019 INSPECTOR HARISH KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Deeksha Khandelwal, Adv. (through VC) with Petitioner no.1 present in person

versus

STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocate with SI Arvind, PS.: Gokalpuri

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

ORDER

% 08.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 10521/2026 (For restoration of petition)

1. By virtue of the present application the applicants/ petitioners seek

restoration of the present petition.

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to

withdraw the present application.

3. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn.

SAURABH BANERJEE, J APRIL 8, 2026/bh

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/04/2026 at 12:01:50

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial