Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Amit Jain vs Harvinder Kaur

Amit Jain vs Harvinder Kaur

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Mar 09, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1264352

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CS(OS)/314/2011
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amit Jain

Advocate Mr. Yash Anand

Respondent

Harvinder Kaur

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ cs(os) 314/2011 amit jain .....plaintiff through: none.versusharvinder kaur .....defendant through: mr. yash anand, adv. (through vc)coram:hon'ble mr. justice avneesh jhinganorder% 09.03.20261. on 02.02.2026, following order was passed: “i.a. 7123/20251. as per office report, the plaintiff has been served for the matter being fixed today.2. learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has got no instructions to enable to pursue the matter and seeks permission to withdraw the vakaltnama.3. for the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed.4. learned counsel for the plaintiff is allowed to withdraw the vakaltnama. cs(os) 314/20114. none for the plaintiff despite service.5. in the interests of justice, put up on 09.03.2026.”2. today, the plaintiff is unrepresented in spite of a passover.3. the suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. avneesh jhingan, j march 9, 2026 ‘ha’this is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 12/03/2026 at 13:19:22

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(OS) 314/2011 AMIT JAIN .....Plaintiff Through: None.

versus

HARVINDER KAUR .....Defendant Through: Mr. Yash Anand, Adv. (through VC)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

ORDER

% 09.03.2026

1. On 02.02.2026, following order was passed: “I.A. 7123/2025

1. As per office report, the plaintiff has been served for the matter being fixed today.

2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has got no instructions to enable to pursue the matter and seeks permission to withdraw the vakaltnama.

3. For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed.

4. Learned counsel for the plaintiff is allowed to withdraw the vakaltnama. CS(OS) 314/2011

4. None for the plaintiff despite service.

5. In the interests of justice, put up on 09.03.2026.”

2. Today, the plaintiff is unrepresented in spite of a passover.

3. The suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J MARCH 9, 2026 ‘ha’

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2026 at 13:19:22

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial