Delhi Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4375/2025 SANJAY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Shukla, Mr. Ankit Duhan, Mr. Aakash Passi and Mr. Yash Chhabra, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP with SI Ravi YadavCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 02.02.2026 BAIL APPLN. 4375/2025&CRL.M.A. 3464/20261. Petitioner seeks early hearing of his bail application which is coming up for consideration on 23.02.2026.2. Since, learned APP for State is also present with IO, the date is pre-poned and the matter is taken up today itself.3. The application stands disposed of.4. Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No. 0518/2025 under Sections 109(1)/3(5) BNS Act (corresponding Sections 307/34 IPC) registered at P.S. Govind Puri.5. The reason assigned is two-fold.6. Firstly, applicant is indisposed, which fact can be verified by seeking a report from the Jail Hospital and secondly, the injured i.e. complainant Kasif is present today an...
Uoi & Ors. vs Kirat Ram & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~71, 74 & 78* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3136/2006 & W.P.(C) 3137-3139/2006 KIRAT RAM & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 4377/2007 & CM APPL. 8202/2007 U.O.I & ORS .....Petitioners SANJAY KAUSHIK & ORS .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 4668/2008 & CM APPL. 9007/2008 V.S.DAHIYA & ORS. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 02.02.20261. Learned counsel representing the Petitioners submits that in compliance of the order passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, the Respondents who were working as LaboratoryAssistants have been granted revised pay scale of 4,000-6,000, with effect from 01.01.1996, as per recommendations of Vth Central Pay Commission and the Respondents have already demitted office after attaining the age of superannuation.2. They submit that while leaving the question of law open, the writ petitions may be disposed of as the Petitioners do not...
Dinesh International Limited vs Principal Commisisoner of Income Tax 1
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 14837/2025 CM NO.6776/2026 CM APPL.6777/2026 DINESH INTERNATIONAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. P. D. Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Gupta and Mr. Prasant Saxena, Advs. Mr. Siddhant Buxy, Adv. for applicant.versusPRINCIPAL COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX 1 .....Respondent Through: Mr. Debesh Panda Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms Anauntta Shankar, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 02.02.2026 CM APPL. 6776/2026 (for impleadment),1. The application seeking impleadment filed by the one of theDirectors, Mr. Daya Kishan Goyal, the erstwhile Director of the Company, is dismissed, because, as whatever may be the dispute between the applicant and the remaining Directors, the same is not germane to the issue in hands inasmuch as it is the companys interest, which we are concerned with in the instant case.2. The application is, therefore, dismissed.3. However, a liberty is given to...
M/S Esme Consumer Pvt Ltd vs Revolution Beauty India Pvt Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 1073/2025 M/S ESME CONSUMER PVT LTD .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rishabh Srivastav, Advocate.versusREVOLUTION BEAUTY INDIA PVT LTD & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Kunal Prakash, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 02.02.2026 I.A. 2790/2026 (Seeking disposal of Suit)1. This is an application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 ofthe Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 jointly filed on behalf of the parties seeking disposal of the Suit in terms of a Settlement Agreement arrived at between the parties. The terms of the Settlement Agreement are enumerated in para 3 of the application.2. It would be apposite to extract para 3 of the application hereunder:3. That during the pendency of the suit, the parties to the suit have approached each other for an amicable settlement of the dispute. In light of the same, the Defendant and the Plaintiff have agreed to amicably resolve the disputes involved...
Rajendra Singh vs Commissioner of Police and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 15082/2025 RAJENDRA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. Anjani Kr. Mishra, Mr. Kailash kr. Jha, Mr. Fareeduddin, Advs.versusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Puja S. kalra, standing counsel with Mr. Virendra singh, Adv.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 02.02.20261. This hearing has been through hybrid mode.2. This is a petition filed by the Petitioner Rajendra Singh, seekingdirections to the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to peacefully vend from his vending site i.e., on the pavement, near Metro Station Gate No. 2, Sarai Kale Khan, Central Zone, Ward-S-56, New Delhi (hereinafter, the vending zone) without any hindrance being caused by any public official.3. The Petitioner further seeks direction to the Respondent to correct the nomenclature in the vending certificate to categorize the Petitioner as a stationary street vendor.4. The Petitioner submits that he...
Sagar vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4531/2025 SAGAR .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (Appearance not given).versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State. SI Dhananjay Kumar.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 02.02.20261. The petitioner herein has unfortunately passed away on 20 th January, 2026, as informed by the Investigating Officer.2. The present application has accordingly become infructuous and stands disposed of.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 02, 2026/lpThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 12:17:20...
Syed Ahmad Shakeel vs National Investigation Agency
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~25 & 26* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(25) CRL.A. 608/2023 (26)+ CRL.A. 609/2023 SHAHID YOUSUF SYED AHMAD SHAKEEL .....Appellants Through: Mr.Nitai Hinduja, Proxy Counsel for Mr.Jawahar Raja, Adv.versusNATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY .....Respondent Through: Mr.Akshai Malik, SPP (NIA) along with Mr.Khawar Saleem, Ms.Diptasree Bag, Advs. with Mr.Pankaj Agarwal, DSP (NIA)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 02.02.20261. The learned counsel for the appellant(s) prays for leave to withdraw the present appeals with liberty to avail of legal remedies as may be available to the appellant(s) in accordance with law.2. The appeals are disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. NAVIN CHAWLA, J RAVINDER DUDEJA, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/rv/ikThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from th...
Meenakshi Bajwa vs Registrar of Co Operative Societies & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 17808/2025 MEENAKSHI BAJWA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Srivastava, Mr. Ashwini.Kr. Singh & Ms. Shruti, Advs.versusREGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advocate for GNCTD/ RCS/R-1. Mr. Gaganmeet Singh Sachdeva, Mr. Hridyesh Khanna & Mr. Harshpeet Singh Chadha, Advs. for DDA.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 02.02.20261. This hearing has been through hybrid mode.2. The Petitioner who is resident of Flat No.- E 403 Jatav CGHS LTD (Opposite Sainik Vihar), Pitampura, Delhi-110034, has filed the present petition seeking regularisation of the said flat in her favour.3. It is her case that she had got the flat transferred from the previousowners, and that the Society i.e., Jatav CGHS LTD, is not objecting to the transfer of the subject flat. In this regard, the Petitioner states that there is a memorandum of transfer of shares recorded by the Socie...
Manoj Kumar Agarwal vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~37 to 69 * IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 2nd February, 2026 + W.P.(C) 19100/2025 & CM APPL. 79494/2025 KAUSHALYA MEENA .....PetitionerUNLON OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Viplav Acharya, SPC, Mr. Yogya Bhatia, Advocate for UoI. + W.P.(C) 19103/2025 & CM APPL. 79501/2025 ANIL KUMAR JHA .....Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Himanshu Sethi, SPC with Mr. Sanjay Pal, GP. Mr. Rishabh Sahu, SPC with Mr. Sameer Sharma and Mr. Karan Malhotra, GP. + W.P.(C) 19107/2025 MD NASIR ALAM .....PetitionerDigitally Signed W.P.(C) 19100/2025 and connected matters Page 1 of 22 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Umang Chopra, SPC with Mr. Karan Malhotra, GP. + W.P.(C) 19187/2025 MANOJ KUMAR AGARWAL .....Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shashank Bajpai, CGSC with Ms. Aashna Mehra and Mr. Vatsal Tripathi, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 11962/2025 & CM ...
Pankaj Rehani vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 15712/2025 & CM APPL. 64323/2025 PANKAJ REHANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Jawa, Ms. Prriyanshi Jain & Ms. Prachi, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Brijesh Kumar Tamber, CGSC, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, GP and Ms. Khyaati Bansal, Mr. Vinay Singh Bisht & Ms. Kirti Barthwal, Advs. for R1 to R3. Mr. B.K. Singh, Advocate for R4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 02.02.20261. The petitioner is operating a savings bank account with respondentno.4 at its Kamla Nagar Branch, New Delhi. It is stated that on 21.07.2025, the petitioner received a message from respondent no.4 informing him that debits from the said account had been blocked and advising him to contact the branch for unblocking. Upon approaching the branch, the petitioner was informed that the action had been taken pursuant to directions received from the Cyber Crime Police Station, Hyderabad...